Slashdot Mirror


What Do You Think of the COLEMAK Keyboard?

dafuchs asks: "Colemak, a new keyboard layout claims to be better then QWERTY and Dvorak. While i'm not certain if I should switch, it looks neat. It is better for hacking then Dvorak, and best of all, the 'l' is not in the right top corner. What do you think? Is it worth a try?"

31 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Same Old Problem by keithmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have the same problem with this layout as I have with every other alternative keyboard layout (including Dvorak): I want to be able to sit down at any computer, anywhere, and touch type. If I commit the COLMAK layout to memory, I'll have big problems the next time I go to a friend's house, an internet cafe, whatever.

    Not worth the trouble.

    1. Re:Same Old Problem by Canthros · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it's not so bad. I switch back and forth from QWERTY to Dvorak on a regular basis. Like, whenever I come home from the office.

      --
      Canthros
    2. Re:Same Old Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have the same problem with Spanish as I have with every other foreign language (including French): I want to be able to sit down next to someone and communicate. If I commit Spanish to memory, I'll have big problems the next time I go to a friend's house, an internet cafe, whatever.

      Not worth the trouble.

    3. Re:Same Old Problem by Ashtead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Actually, the keyboard remapping is not on the same level as using different languages. They are more on the level of having to use the same old alphabet in a new sequence. Imagine a country or province where all signs, newspapers etc. had been printed with a specific transposition of letters, (say, rot13 as an example, but any of the other possible 26!-2 combinations would have been the same) and then having to quickly switch back and forth between them? You can probably do it with some practice, but in the meantime it has slowed you way down, for no reasonable purpose at all.

      I find even the punctuation moving around between Norwegian and US standard keyboards to be bad enough when having to type the simplest of texts (text with only letters, digits, period, comma, and exclamation marks; the rest of the punctuation has moved around). It isn't like I cannot use it, but once I get to a point where there should be a question mark and i get an underscore instead, or a left parentheses and not the right one, I have to slow way down from the "typing while looking at the screen"-mode, where the thoughts, the fingers, the keyboard and associated circuitry run like a smooth-flowing pipeline, about as easy as talking, to "hunt-and-peck" mode, where the flow is more like the stop-and-go traffic of a city street grid.

      This has nothing to do with language, but all to do with the path from brain to machine.

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    4. Re:Same Old Problem by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 2, Informative
      I find even the punctuation moving around between Norwegian and US standard keyboards to be bad enough when having to type the simplest of texts (text with only letters, digits, period, comma, and exclamation marks; the rest of the punctuation has moved around). It isn't like I cannot use it, but once I get to a point where there should be a question mark and i get an underscore instead, or a left parentheses and not the right one, I have to slow way down from the "typing while looking at the screen"-mode, where the thoughts, the fingers, the keyboard and associated circuitry run like a smooth-flowing pipeline, about as easy as talking, to "hunt-and-peck" mode, where the flow is more like the stop-and-go traffic of a city street grid.

      Actually, this is just lack of training with switching between these.

      And again in norwegian: Dette er faktisk bare fordi du mangler trening i å bytte mellom disse.

      I use both layouts, and have for two decades. When you've used both in parallel and switched a lot, it's trivial, and it sits in the fingers for both. It can take quite a while to get used to, though.

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    5. Re:Same Old Problem by WebCrapper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This whole conversation shows the need for a new product. I don't have the background to do it, but I'll throw it out there in case anyone wants to run with it...

      Just like the keyloggers that you can install on "any keyboard" why not make a very simple device that remaps the keyboard? Be it USB or PS2, just a simple in-line device. All it would need to do is capture the keys in the way you're typing in and translate them into the "normal" QWERTY layout.

      Simple enough, walk around with a small device the size of some of these keyloggers are, plug it in between the keyboard and computer and you've got your layout anywhere you go. Same device, just with different programming allows for different layouts...

      If someone wants to run with this, by all means go ahead, you've got my blessing.

  2. I think... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That having somehow learned to touch-type on QWERTY some time in the last 30 years, there's zero chance I'm going to switch to a new variation of a conventional keyboard.

    Alternative input, chorded keyboards and the like might have some value.

    A "different sequence of letters" would do little but slow down my touch-typing for YEARS and interfere with the interface for any games that I choose to play on the PC.

    TFA: "Typing lessons available" ... yea great. Typing lessons didn't get me to touch typing on QWERTY, experience did. I have little time for classes, and I tend to devote those to something that's going to make my paycheck larger.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  3. I have two questions by MuNansen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two questions:

    1 - Why do people keep coming up with new keyboard layouts when there's already only a few hundred million people with QWERTY committed to memory? It's not like they've come up with a new energy supply.

    2 - And why does Slashdot keep posting about them? Have any geeks anywhere (other than the makers of these keyboards) actually sat around thinking of all the things they could have, it'd be a new "improved" keyboard layout? If there's a good reason please let me know.

    1. Re:I have two questions by MuNansen · · Score: 2, Funny

      What a stupid reply. Thanks for taking the time to lower my IQ. Keyboard layout and programming languages. Yeah, totally the same thing. Oh wait, you must be one of the guys that's trying to sell one of these pieces of crap. My bad.

    2. Re:I have two questions by kurosawdust · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What a stupid reply. Thanks for taking the time to lower my IQ. Keyboard layout and programming languages. Yeah, totally the same thing. Oh wait, you must be one of the guys that's trying to sell one of these pieces of crap. My bad.

      If you had put in the same amount of effort to read my post as you did in crafting your oh-so-eloquent response, you'd realize that the analogy answers both of your questions. People keep coming up with new keyboard layouts for the same reason they come up with new programming languages - because it's a project they want to accomplish in an area that they find interesting (see the fellow who set up an evolutionary algorithm to determine the best layout). This also answers the second question, although that could have been answered by looking at, oh, I don't know, just about every single post on slashdot about some guy making a rocketship out of old toast or putting his G3 mac into a Commodore 64 case and the inevitable dozen "but why on earth would someone do this?" replies.

      By the way, if you had RTFA, you'd realize that nobody is selling anything - it's a free software keyboard layout. Keyboard and keyboard layout. Yeah, totally the same thing. Oh wait, you must be one of those guys who is so interested in posting a reply that you think is clever that you don't bother to read either the article or the post to which you are replying. My bad.

      No offense, but my posts aside, I think you're doing just fine lowering your IQ on your own :).

  4. Go ahead by Gyga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Go ahead and try, and please tell us it looks interesting and if only 2 keys move between hands it should be easy to learn. The only problem I see is that the caps lock acts like a backspace, this could cause AOL 12 PRETENDING TO BE 14 YR OLD YELLING SYNDROM. It keeps the short cuts for cut/copy/paste in the same spot, this is very good.

    Without actually using it I say it sounds neat and I might try it also, if someone makes a keyboard for it, right now it seems that you have to relabel/not look at, your keyboard.

    Anyone else feel like they steped into a wikipedia article when they used the link?

    --
    I don't preview or spellcheck.
  5. I vote yes.. for me by Carpe+PM · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Disclaimer: I am a typing bonehead. I do not touch-type. QWERTY has never been 'right' in my mind.

    Any improvement in efficiency is ultimately worth it.

    Also, 'We've always done it this way' is a terrible excuse for anything.

    1. Re:I vote yes.. for me by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny
      " 'We've always done it this way' is a terrible excuse for anything. "

      Well, perhaps we could make an exception for sex. :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  6. What's the point? by Threni · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are we still looking for a keyboard which is somehow quicker to type on than Qwerty? Why? What characteristics are we after, exactly? How would you measure how much better it is? Keep finding 1000 people to start from scratch with it, time them learning it, then time them using it at a reasonable level of competence? Where are you going to find people who haven't been "tainted" with Qwerty?

    Give up, or at least, stop posting about it to Slashdot. Please.

  7. Not really multilingual by W2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Their website cites "multilingual" as a major feature of this layout. Reading a bit more about this however, they've just made up lots of key combos for various "multilingual" characters. So? Anyone can pull a bunch of key combos out of their $ORIFICE and list them on a web page, or even write a custom keyboard map. And speaking as someone who does a lot of typing in my native language, I'd rather have my Ås, Äs and Ös as first-class letters, thankyouverymuch. Putting either under a (non-initiutive) key combo like [AltGr][f] is, principally, the same to me as putting "Q" under [AltGr][O]...

    Btw, according to TFA, it's "Colemak" not "COLMAK". The website is even Colemak.com ffs...

    I'll stick to QWERTY for the time being.

    --
    Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    1. Re:Not really multilingual by W2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forgot to add: They also claim that their layout requires "no special hardware". This too is highly questionable, as most people would value having a keyboard that actually produces keypresses in accordance with what's printed on the keys. This is especially valuable when trying to learn a new keyboard layout, as (almost) anyone adopting Colemak would have to do.

      However, since there are (at this time) no known vendors of Colemak-layout keyboards, anyone wanting to use such a keyboard with the proper key mappings would have to rearrange the keys by himself. Even then the result would not be perfect as the symbols combined on a number of keys (like the number keys, hah) have changed. In other words, not only does the Colemak layout require special hardware, there are possibly no keyboards that can even be (easily) modified to be fully Colemak-compliant.

      Of course, you could always buy a Das Keyboard and write on the keys yourself. But I'd hardly consider that an easy mod.

      --
      Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    2. Re:Not really multilingual by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Funny

      It might be a good way to discourage others from using your system if your keys were not only unlabeled, but they were not even QWERTY.

    3. Re:Not really multilingual by Gadzinka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And speaking as someone who does a lot of typing in my native language, I'd rather have my Ås, Äs and Ös as first-class letters, thankyouverymuch.

      I, on the other hand, am glad, that some ppl at the beginning of the computer era in Poland decided to disregard official Polish Norms and create "Polish Programer's Keyboard" -- basically US QWERTY keyboard with all the nine Polish characters[1] accessible via Alt keys on their latin counterparts. Polish "typewriter keyboard" is QWERTZ with some "additions" which basically make it unusable for anything computer related due to all those removed special symbols, and it still lacks some Polsh characters in upper/lower case.

      But still, typing "Alt+t, c" instead of "Alt+c" is plain dumb. The only good thing in this layout would be the ability to occasionally write diacritical characters from other latin-based languages w/o the necessity to switch keymaps.

      Robert

      [1] aogonek, cacute, eogonek, lstroke, nacute, oacute, sacute, zacute, zabovedot -- frelling /. filters unicode characters

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
  8. I have enough trouble with keyboards already by Kymermosst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a Sun system with a Sun keyboard, and I work with Sun servers at work. I also deal with several PCs at home and work. There are no less than five keyboard variations.

    I have problems switching between the Sun keyboard and the PC keyboard due to the row change of the backspace key. It takes 10-15 minutes before I am confident I won't make mistakes. Depending on which PC keyboard I was using last, a mistake may mean hitting enter or '\' instead of backspace. That can be a fatal error when you are root. At work, I always use a PC keyboard to ssh to the Sun systems, that way I don't make mistakes.

    Then there are keyboards that have ESC where I prefer '`'.

    The worst is that there are no less than three ways to position the '\' key on PC keyboards. Sometimes, the placement affects either the size of the backspace key or the shape of the enter key.

    I prefer the enter key to be a rectangle (none of that backwards-L shaped crap), the backspace key to be at least as big as two normal keys, and the '\' key to be in between them.

    So, you're asking me if I want to change a dozen or more keys around?

    Hell no!

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:I have enough trouble with keyboards already by blincoln · · Score: 3, Funny

      One of the great mysteries of the universe: who at Sun though it was a good idea to put the caps lock key below the caps lock key?

      So... Sun keyboards have dual caps lock keys? For twice the caps locking capability?

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    2. Re:I have enough trouble with keyboards already by bloosqr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its funny you say that as I know a lot of people who like it that way. In fact I do the
      exact same thing on standard pc keyboards (swap caps lock and ctrl). The capslock is hardly ever used while ctrl is used quite a bit (think emacs) so swapping them makes it *much* easier to extensively use the ctrl key instead of stretching the pinky down.

      That said, for linux and sun I think you should like into Xmodmap Not only can you software swap the ctrl and
      capslock back to the pc position (or as I do swap pc keyboards to the sun position) you can remap the del key to backspace (which I agree is in the wrong place).

      Actually if you aren't running X on your sun box the standard place to fix the stupid backspace issue is using stty in your .profile (or whatever shell you use)

      stty erase ^?

      In any case that will fix your backspace issue. I'm surprised you dont like the ctrl-capslock switch as it really does make life easier..

      anyway regardless of how you like it there is no need to purchase an external keyboard for unix systems (except for the mac which has some funky hardware capslock which prevents switching :( :( )

          -avi

  9. Re:As with all layouts that aren't QWERTY. . . by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 2, Funny

    What could be more convenient then lugging a keyboard with you everywhere you go?

  10. Re:As with all layouts that aren't QWERTY. . . by countach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where in heck are you going to get a hardware implementation of COLEMAK????

  11. Re:As with all layouts that aren't QWERTY. . . by Brento · · Score: 2, Funny

    These days you can just carry a USB DVORAK (or COLEMAK) keyboard around with you and plug it in wherever youre using it.

    Sounds great! So where do I order the ergonomic USB COLEMAK keyboard?

    Oh, wait, lemme guess - from the same store that carries the COLEMAK laptops, right? Got it. It's filed right here under my stack of pamphlets for functioning perpetual motion machines.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  12. passwd by DavidLeeRoth · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think i will have to change all my passwords from qwerty to colmak.

  13. Re:I think... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Think of it this way: Nobody else will use your computer. They'll take one look at the keyboard and decide it isn't worth the effort.

    One of my friends just recently sanded all the letters/punctuation off his keyboard and airbrushed everything black.

    There is 0 (Zero) chance that I will ever really try to use his computer if I'm at his place. It just isn't worth the guesswork to browse a website.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  14. Ctrl-Z/X/C/V shortcuts on QWERTY too hard? by Calaf · · Score: 2

    In the FAQ, he says that "It's not possible to use Ctrl-Z/X/C/V shortcuts with the left hand while holding the mouse with the right hand." This is certainly not the case for me; I do this all the time, frequently without looking. With my left hand, I hit Ctrl with my pinky and hold it, while with my index finger I hit X, C, or V as needed. I've been doing this since the Windows 3.1 days.

  15. Re:As with all layouts that aren't QWERTY. . . by Hast · · Score: 2, Informative

    At least, that was the case the last time I looked into it.

    Look into it some more then.

    I actually don't know about admin rights to install. As we all have admin on our own computers at work. Adding a Dvorak layout to my XP computer took about 30 seconds.

    But changing the settings takes about a Left SHIFT + ALT press to change. You can also have different keyboard settings and change them by simply clicking.

    Takes all of 5 seconds.

    Learning to use it, well, that's a different story.

  16. Re:As with all layouts that aren't QWERTY. . . by cortana · · Score: 3, Insightful

    xmodmap

  17. My related Dvorak story by jbreidbord · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm 21-years-old and typed in QWERTY for seven years starting at age 12, ultimately reaching 130+ words per minute. Rather than study for a test at uni two years ago, I decided to start learning DVORAK. For the rest of the semester lab reports were hard to write and after a week, I was a steady 40 wpm on Dvorak but my QWERTY speed dropped to about 50 wpm--after such a loss, there was no turning back! After four months exclusively on Dvorak I was at 90 wpm and by the half-year mark I was at 120 wpm. As for people who compare switching back-and-forth between keylayouts to bilingualism, they either (a) do not speak from experience or (b) do not type fast on either layout. Occasionally switching back to QWERTY is a REAL PAIN. The only words I can type fast on QWERTY include the URL to my uni's webmail page, my first and last name (email login), and email password. I've found that I only reach tolerable QWERTY speeds if I'm going back to QWERTY on a daily basis. I also think it helps to use the EXACT SAME KEYBOARD IN THE EXACT SAME LOCATION to really rev up QWERTY rates quickly. Of course, the latter statement sounds like psychobabble, but my muscle memory seems to benefit from these constants. If you haven't garnered these from DVORAK fan sites, here are some little tidbits: * 'a' and 'm' are the only keys that are not moved between QWERTY and ANSI Dvorak (more on ANSI later...) * the Dvorak home row includes aoeu ih htns - (spaces insert for readibilty) * as an OS X user, I find Dvorak much more amenable to common keyboard shortucts. Quit is cmd+Q and Close Window is cmd+w, which makes for easy muscle-memorisation on a Powerbook keyboard with the keys physically rearranged for Dvorak (http://www.geocities.com/rjpoling/MacOS/dvorak/dv orak_powerbook.jpg [geocities.com]) As for ANSI mentioned above, here's the real doozey: August Dvorak initially proposed an alternate number-row layout in his book Typewriting Behavior (1936, I think?). Rather than 12345 67890, Dvorak liked 75319 02468 (again, spaces inserted for readability). In theory, I don't know how much this helps. In practice, it's kinda useful these days since the '@' character is easily accessed with the index finger. This alternate number layout was NOT included in the standard ANSI Dvorak layout, but keymap files may be easily modified by true fanatics. On OS X, I highly recommend Ukelele (http://www.sil.org/computing/catalog/show_softwar e.asp?id=94 [sil.org]). I'm two-weeks into learning the alternate layout and am finally getting good at it. In sum, the Dvorak layout markedly reduces finger movement for standard English text (http://www.acm.vt.edu/~jmaxwell/dvorak/comparePag e.html [vt.edu]); it seems to not be so helpful to developers. If you type fast on QWERTY now, you'll lose a lot of it after learning Dvorak. You may be able to get good enough at QWERTY but it won't be soon after learning Dvorak and it won't be fast and your boss will look at you funny when you're hunting and pecking. Hope this helps. Jon

  18. I Type 90 WPM by SlippyToad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In fact, I type so fast that I have to step away from my keyboard before I submit one-line comments on Slashdot due to the "idiot filter" that some idiot put in (and which I don't appreciate).

    In short, I don't need a better keyboard. Even keyboards that move the backslash from above [ENTER] to beside [SHIFT] drive me insane. It's not that I don't want to commit to a new keyboard layout, it's that I don't need to bother. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with the one that is in use now, and no amount of self-serving BS from would-be layout designers can convince me otherwise.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on