Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Tries To Charm EU With Future Visions

RedStar writes "BBC Online has a piece on Microsoft's visions of the future as shown to Euro MPs in a charm operation." From the article: "This is more a new concept than a new technology, and the real version may still be a year or two away. It would track the mobile phone signals of loved ones, then cross-reference which mobile cell they were in with pre-programmed locations, like the home, school, or workplace. Ms Sellen added: 'This is not very specific at all about where people are, and that's deliberate. We don't want to invade people's privacy too much, so we deliberately keep things very coarse grained.'"

21 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. Mix that..... by scenestar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    with the data retention laws and you have a totalitarian's wet dream.

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:Mix that..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ..or a criminal's worst nightmare.

      That's another way of looking at it.

    2. Re:Mix that..... by TCM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ..or a criminal's worst nightmare.

      That's 100% correct. What I fear is just that the definition of "criminal" will change to include normal citizens pretty fast.

      How's that for yet another look at it?

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
  2. You're misunderstanding! by oahazmatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would track the mobile phone signals of loved ones, then cross-reference which mobile cell they were in with pre-programmed locations, like the home, school, or workplace.

    We don't want to be Big Brother. We want to make the tools so you can be Big Brother!

    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
    1. Re:You're misunderstanding! by Androclese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm actually torn on this one.

      The untrusting SOB that I am, I don't people invading my privacy and tracking me wherever I go.

      The Parent in my wants to be able to track where my daughter when she goes out down to the foot so I can find her if need be. (curfew, scum boyfriend, being *at* her boyfriends, being where she is not supposed to be, etc.)

      I honestly don't know which way to go with this. Maybe if we were able to turn the GPS tracking off...

    2. Re:You're misunderstanding! by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you need a tool like this in order to parent, you've already failed.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:You're misunderstanding! by belarm314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need 100% assurance that they'll be safe.

      There is no such thing...and even if there were, we'd wind up with a generation of children who had no ability to deal with pain (physical or otherwise). Not to mention the fact that they'd have no interesting stories to tell about their childhood later in life.

      Not wanting your kid to get killed is one thing. Being so over-protective that they wind up with ulcers by the age of 16 because being out of their physical and emotional safety zone causes them near-panic levels of stress is quite another.

      I don't know about you, but most of the things worth knowing that I learned as a child were gleaned in defiance of my parents' rules, or by their reaction to me breaking them. There is an abundance of parents who are deathly afraid of their children failing, falling, or feeling in anyway unhappy at any time...these children are learning nothing about real life.

      </rambling rant>

      --
      When moderating, assume I have not yet had my coffee.
    4. Re:You're misunderstanding! by penguinoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you need a tool like this in order to parent, you've already failed.

      I got the implication that he only thought it would be convenient. Because good parent or no, kids will do stupid shit. They'll do stuff they're told not to do. Occasionally, they do stuff *because* they were told not to do it. Tracking them might make it easier and quicker to find out when they are misbehaving. Not unlike how Big Brother doesn't need to track our cell phones to see if we are misbehaving, but would like to be able to do it anyways.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  3. To the proles, maybe by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ordinary people will be fed the fuzzy location, based on real data: To a few meters of precision.

    I'm so glad big brother is watching me! It's douple-plus good that I'm being watched!

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  4. Love that quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "don't want to invade people's privacy TOO MUCH"

    Emphasis mine, of course. But that's just so telling, isn't it?

  5. I get the picture, it's Microsoft *Research* by Ithika · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, I understand, it's not ready yet. You don't have to keep telling me every two paragraphs how stuff that's in R&D won't be available to buy this Christmas. Jeez.

  6. Bwahahaha by somethinghollow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We don't want to invade people's privacy too much

    Yes. We want to invade their privacy just the right amount. :\

  7. Read that as "future versions" by PurifyYourMind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But on a more serious note, people here might be surprised that UK people (at least those in London, if I recall correctly), aren't as worried about privacy/spying issues as you might think. London has had hundreds of cameras in its metro area to prevent crime. I think it would be a little worrying if it recorded political protests or other citizen-sensitive events. But overall I imagine there's a reduction in person-to-person crime there.

    1. Re:Read that as "future versions" by TeacherOfHeroes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just keep in mind that theres a bit of a difference between casually observing a public environment with a camera, and trackinging you in particular where ever you go by turning your cell phone into a 24/7 tracking device.

      My question is, will cellphones start to not turn off when the cell phone is "off". Will "off" now mean "really low power mode" - just enough to keep transmitting?

  8. Privacy issues by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Those in London had rather more to worry about, when those cameras went up. The IRA were literally driving trucks with thousand pound bombs in the back, which made a lot of people very nervous. Things have settled down somewhat since then.


    It is also important to remember that although data retention laws require information to be available for security reasons, the Data Protection Act prohibits making that information available to anyone else. In fact, most of Europe has incredibly strict privacy laws - along with laws prohibiting the trade of such information to organizations and companies that are outside the jurisdiction of those privacy laws.


    A good solid campaign by European technophiles, to remind Euro MPs (and regular MPs) about the British and European privacy laws with regards to personal data, especially when coupled with reminders of Microsoft's extremely dodgy past on security issues, would be likely to derail Microsoft's efforts entirely, as their proposals are technically illegal and politicians in Europe - at least for now - are eager to NOT be seen aiding and abetting lawbreakers. In fact, a solid-enough campaign that also brought in Microsoft's status in Europe as a monopolist guilty of breaking trade laws might potentially finish off Microsoft in Europe entirely.


    Before anyone marks me as rabidly anti-Microsoft (I'm not rabid, I just don't like them), this post is not a condemnation of the corporation. It is merely pointing out that their proposal violates EU privacy directives and assorted national laws. This is more likely ignorance than malice, as America has no concept of privacy, but that simply isn't relevent. It would be relatively easy for someone to spin this in a way that would leave politicians with very cold feet. Politicians aren't generally brave - that's not how to get re-elected. Politicians are professional cowards. No sane coward is going to want to be seen breaking the law - or even potentially breaking it - right now. If that were to be how opponents presented it, most politicos would back off very very quickly.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  9. It's not tracking *you*... by Froggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it's only tracking your phone. As such, it's pretty easy to avoid "surveillance": just leave the thing behind. Of course that means people can't ring you, but if you're really worried about your privacy you maybe don't want to be connected 24/7 anyway.

    Me, I lose the damn thing all the time anyway. "Where's Mama today? Oh look, she's been dropped behind the couch again."

    --
    It is a woman's prerogative to change other people's minds.
  10. It seems inevitable.... by SammysIsland · · Score: 2, Insightful
    that this sort of thing will happen given the speedy advances in technology, specifically wireless technologies. Our service provides will always have the ability to track this sort of information. What is MOST important is that this information is not transferred from providers to others (including government). Laws must keep up with technology, and this seems impossible with 9/11 style legislation.

    What we will need, for our protection from 1984, or probably more like 2020, is end user liscence contracts, rather than agreements. The end user should start imposing contracts (union style) on service providers that set out the terms of what the company can and cannot do with information on the customer. This should specifically include limitation on data retention, and use of information for marketing.

    This would not seem dissimilar to medical information or even seemingly more confidential, client lawyer relationships.

  11. bad parenting or not... by quest(answer)ion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    sadly, most parents have already failed. for some parents, the analogy of the police-state is just fine for them in terms of how they run their household. it's easy to say "get involved," but the fact is that getting involved is a damn sight harder than it sounds for a disturbingly large portion of parents.

    in the face of an inability to actually communicate, what's left is oversight (which is true regardless of whether we're talking about the relationship of Big Brother to the People or of Mom and Dad to The Kids).

    look at some mobile phone ads even now: the 'parental' motive for giving your kid a phone is that it allows you to keep in contact, or keep in touch. using the phone as a tracking device like this is just a logical extension of that impulse, and i can guarantee that there will be a ready and willing market for it.

    --
    /. is what happens when geeks talk. get used to it.
  12. Too much ? by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We don't want to invade people's privacy too much, so we deliberately keep things very coarse grained.

    How about you don't invade it at all ? I would really like to be able to carry my mobile phone with me without announcing to everyone who cares to ask where I go, especially since our Glorious Leaders made that little data retention law...

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  13. Re:Decentralized version by Bj�rn · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As far as the big brother issue - just turn off your phone when you are not using it.. sheesh.

    Yeah, it's not like I have a mobile phone so that people can call me. Obviously I only use my mobile to call others. ;-)

    --
    Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think. --Niels Bohr
  14. still true by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if you can not dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullsh!t...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing