Update to OpenOffice 2 Released

VincenzoRomano writes "The very first update to OpenOffice 2, namely v2.0.1, has been released. Despite its version numbering, along with minor bug fixes there are a number of new features. From the update page: 'For example, it is now possible to disable and hide particular application settings, which comes in handy for central administration in networks. Plus, a new keyboard shortcut permits the user to return to a saved cursor position. The bullets and numbering feature has been expanded, and a new mail merge feature is available.' Downloads are ready in both binary formats and source code for an ever increasing number of localised languages. Go grab your version!"

Comments

Why don't they release a patch?

[n0dna]

Doesn't ~75mb seem a bit stupid every time there is an update?

Re:Why don't they release a patch?

[Pneuma ROCKS]

Yes, I don't intend to spend so much time downloading and reinstalling the whole thing just to get some minor (and a few major) updates. Call me when there's a real major change, maybe version 2.1. They should take a page from Firefox 1.5 and do automatic patching. All the cool applications are doing it :).

Thanks for the info

[Bullfish]

I appreciate the info about the update, but it's not really worthy of a story posting. I am sure a bunch of games and other software had additions today too.

This is useful info though. Perhaps Slashdot could make a software update page for things like this rather than posting them on the main page. It would also avoid the inevitable dumbass comments that spring up when these things happen.

What's happened to open source numbering?

[Spril]

We complain that the marketing people took over the numbering at Microsoft and other companies--like Oracle "10g" when there was no a, b, c, d, e, or f.

Now open source is pulling the same stunts--Firefox went from 1.0 to 1.5, and OpenOffice squeezes new features into a 2.0.1 release.

Whatever happened to the standard that major feature releases increment the first number, minor feature releases increment the second number, and tweaks and bug fixes increment the third number? What is the point of numbering releases "2.0.1" if you're not going to follow the standard?

And who are the marketing people who have taken over these projects who think that version numbers are a marketing tool, and not a way to convey useful information about the extent of the changes?

Re:Open Office

[Anonymous Coward]

That was the most boring story I've ever heard in all my life. and I'm not usually given to superlatives.

Re:Open Office

[meringuoid]

So I told him to goto openoffice.org, and get the free office suite. He asked me what that was, I took him to my desktop, and showed it to him. 20 minutes later he was making a power point in open office.

Now, come on. Your story was plausible up to then, but you blew it. 20 minutes isn't even enough to open OpenOffice, never mind download and install it...

Re:Is the update worth it??

[mspohr]

I haven't experienced the "memory hog" with 2.0

I just opened a small text file with OO.org and it takes up all of 13Meg. The same file with Winword uses 34Meg.

YMMV

It breaks the database and a whole lot of stuff

[Anonymous Coward]

Java gets used quite a bit in OpenOffice.org. In OpenOffice.org 1.1.4 Java was used for the following:

1. The Report Autopilot

2. JDBC driver support for Java-based databases

3. XSLT filters

4. BeanShell, the Netbeans scripting language, and the Java UNO bridge

5. Export filters to the Aportis.doc (.pdb) format for the Palm or Pocket Word (.psw) format for the Pocket PC

In OpenOffice.org 2.0 Java is additionally used in

1. Many parts of Base, the new Access-like database application; in particular the file-format which is a HSQLDB database

2. The media player, which adds movie and sound clips to documents

3. Mail merges to e-mail, which also require Java Mail

4. All document wizards in Writer