Slashdot Mirror


Senate Proposes Patriot Act Extension

geekylinuxkid writes "Senate leaders reached a bipartisan agreement Wednesday night to extend expiring and controversial provisions of the Patriot Act for six months. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Republican from Tennessee, announced the agreement from the Senate floor, ending an impasse over the measure." From the article: "Last week, the House voted 251-174 to renew the 16 provisions after striking a compromise that altered some of them. The provisions were set to expire at year's end if not renewed. Controversial measures include those allowing the FBI -- with a court order -- to obtain secret warrants for business, library, medical and other records, and to get a wiretap on every phone a suspect uses." More commentary on the BBC. We reported on last week's failure of the original renewal.

7 of 519 comments (clear)

  1. I think they mean... by captainbeardo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Extension, not extention...

  2. Re:A Numbers Station? by anarchynow · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Natasha, you imbecile... do not transmit over dis channel... vee have to get the moose.... Anyone that's dialed around a shortwave dial has heard the CIA number codes being transmited... One time pad is not that hard to implement in a computer program, and disguise the resulting data in BINHXQ output or hide it in a JPG... why post it plain text ascii... This is a riddle someone has put up... to your caclulators, men!

  3. Re:A Numbers Station? by hazem · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I agree with the internet being more ubiquitous and more mainstream. But I wouldn't post numbers messages. Instead, I'd embed the messages as static in images - almost like watermarking - maybe posted to usenet. That way, it's easy to send & recieve, and most people wouldn't even notice that there's messages in the images.

  4. To: cryptography[at]metzdowd.com by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    To: cryptography[at]metzdowd.com
    Subject: A small editorial about recent events.
    From: "Perry E. Metzger"
    Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:58:06 -0500

    A small editorial from your moderator. I rarely use this list to express a strong political opinion -- you will forgive me in this instance.

    This mailing list is putatively about cryptography and cryptography politics, though we do tend to stray quite a bit into security issues of all sorts, and sometimes into the activities of the agency with the biggest crypto and sigint budget in the world, the NSA.

    As you may all be aware, the New York Times has reported, and the administration has admitted, that President of the United States apparently ordered the NSA to conduct surveillance operations against US citizens without prior permission of the secret court known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (the "FISC"). This is in clear contravention of 50 USC 1801 - 50 USC 1811, a portion of the US code that provides for clear criminal penalties for violations. See:

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode50/us c_sup_01_50_10_36_20_I.html

    The President claims he has the prerogative to order such surveillance. The law unambiguously disagrees with him.

    There are minor exceptions in the law, but they clearly do not apply in this case. They cover only the 15 days after a declaration of war by congress, a period of 72 hours prior to seeking court authorization (which was never sought), and similar exceptions that clearly are not germane.

    There is no room for doubt or question about whether the President has the prerogative to order surveillance without asking the FISC -- even if the FISC is a toothless organization that never turns down requests, it is a federal crime, punishable by up to five years imprisonment, to conduct electronic surveillance against US citizens without court authorization.

    The FISC may be worthless at defending civil liberties, but in its arrogant disregard for even the fig leaf of the FISC, the administration has actually crossed the line into a crystal clear felony. The government could have legally conducted such wiretaps at any time, but the President chose not to do it legally.

    Ours is a government of laws, not of men. That means if the President disagrees with a law or feels that it is insufficient, he still must obey it. Ignoring the law is illegal, even for the President. The President may ask Congress to change the law, but meanwhile he must follow it.

    Our President has chosen to declare himself above the law, a dangerous precedent that could do great harm to our country. However, without substantial effort on the part of you, and I mean you, every person reading this, nothing much is going to happen. The rule of law will continue to decay in our country. Future Presidents will claim even greater extralegal authority, and our nation will fall into despotism. I mean that sincerely. For the sake of yourself, your children and your children's children, you cannot allow this to stand.

    Call your Senators and your Congressman. Demand a full investigation, both by Congress and by a special prosecutor, of the actions of the Administration and the NSA. Say that the rule of law is all that stands between us and barbarism. Say that we live in a democracy, not a kingdom, and that our elected officials are not above the law. The President is not a King. Even the President cannot participate in a felony and get away with it. Demand that even the President must obey the law.

    Tell your friends to do the same. Tell them to tell their friends to do the same. Then, call back next week and the week after and the week after that until something happens. Mark it in your calendar so you don't forget about it. Politicians have short memories, and Congress is about to recess for Christmas, so you must not allow this to be forgotten. Keep at them until something happens.

    Perry

    The Cryptography Mailing List

    Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo[at]metzdowd.com

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  5. The Loyal Citizen's Contract With the American Gov by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Recycled from other thread. Circulate freely.

    Considering the responses of Bill Kristol, the Wall Street Journal, and others to President Bush's affirmation of warrantless domestic spying by the NSA, perhaps it's time to separate the wheat from the chaff in this America. The Rude Pundit believes a new "contract" of sorts is needed between the government and the American people. Howzabout this:

    "I (the undersigned) believe President George W. Bush when he says that the United States of America is fighting a 'new kind of enemy' that requires 'new thinking' about how to wage war. Therefore, as a loyal citizen of President Bush's United States, my signature below indicates my agreement to the following:

    "1. I believe wholeheartedly in the Patriot Act as initially passed by Congress in 2001, as well as the provisions of the Domestic Security Enhancement Act. Therefore, I grant the FBI access to:

    "a. my library records, so it may determine if I am reading material that might designate me an enemy of the nation;

    "b. my financial records, including credit reports, so it may determine if I am contributing monetarily to any governmentally proscribed activities or organizations;

    "c. my medical records, so it may determine if my prescriptions, injuries, or other conditions are indicative of terrorist activity on my part;

    "d. any and all other personal records including, but not limited to, my store purchases, my school records, my web browsing history, and anything else determined as a 'tangible thing' necessary to engage in a secret investigation of me.

    "I agree that I do not need to be notified if my records have come under scrutiny by the FBI, and, furthermore, I agree that no warrant is needed for the FBI to engage in this examination of my personal records. Additionally, I agree that the FBI should be allowed to monitor any groups it believes may be linked to what it determines to be terrorist activity.

    "2. I believe that the President of the United States has the power to mitigate any and all laws passed by the Congress and that he has such power granted to him by his status as Commander-in-Chief in the Constitution as well as the 2001 Authorization of Military Force, passed by the Congress, which states that the President can use 'all necessary and appropriate force' in prosecution of the war. Therefore, I grant the United States government the following powers:

    "a. that the National Security Agency, under the direction of the President, may tap my phone lines and intercept my e-mail without warrant or FISA oversight;

    "b. that the President may hold me or other detainees without access to the legal system for a period of time determined by the President or his agents;

    "c. that the President may authorize physical force against me or other individual detainees in order to gain intelligence and that he may define whether such physical force may be called 'torture':

    "d. that the President may set aside any and all laws he sees as hindering the gathering of intelligence and prevention of terrorist acts for a period as time determined by the President, including, but not limited to, rights to political protest.

    "I agree that the Judicial and Legislative branch should be allowed no oversight of these activities, and that such oversight merely emboldens the terrorists. I also agree that virtually all of these activities may be conducted in complete secrecy and that revelation of these activities amount to treasonous behavior on the part of those who reveal these activities to the press and the citizenry.

    "3. Finally, this document is my statement that I believe the President of the United States and the entire executive branch, as well as all departments and agencies involved, as well as all of its personnel, will treat these powers I have granted them with utmost respect. I believe that these powers will not be abused, nor will any of the information I have given them permission to examine be misinterpreted. However, should suc

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  6. It's a slightly weird form of Troll. by abb3w · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    See here. The trolls may, in fact, be encrypted messages... or may just be random numbers. Or maybe someone's using Slashdot for their drug deals; I dunno, I don't work for the NSA. Feel free to try and get CmdrTaco drunk enough to talk about whether he's gotten a national security letter over it the next time you see him.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  7. Re:The Loyal Citizen's Contract With the American by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah. And cheap gas is negotiable, if you can still walk around feeling better than everyone, and pride yourself on your anger.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell