Slashdot Mirror


Dvorak Says MS Should Buy Opera

patro writes "Should MS beef up cranky old Internet Explorer for today's standards? Dvorak thinks buying Opera would be a smarter move. It works on all the major platforms including the Mac which IE won't support anymore and $400 million for it is pocket money for Microsoft."

10 of 521 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah, well... by killmenow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Dvorak is a hack...so, there you have it.

    1. Re:Yeah, well... by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...Dvorak is a hack...so, there you have it.

      You got modded as a troll, but your comment is 100% correct. Dvorak has made a career out of spouting sensational bullshit (which even he must know is nonsense) in order to generate more hits for his site. He's one of the most successful trolls on all of the Internet.

      If the editors are going to pay any attention whatsoever to submissions about his articles (and they ought not), then Slashdot needs a "Dvorak" category, so we can filter it out.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  2. It works on all the major platforms... by ThatGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft doesn't want their stuff to work on all other platforms... After all, they intentionally discontinued work on IE for mac, and have bought several companies only to immediately axe their Linux offerings.

    Microsoft is not a company selling apps, Microsoft is a company selling lock-in. As long as customers are sticking with them, they don't really need to spend "pocket change" to keep up with technology.

    --
    What are you eating? isItVeg?.
  3. Dvorak has apparently forgotten.. by McNally · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dvorak has apparently forgotten all the work that Microsoft put into stuffing Internet Explorer and its components into every unlikely corner of the Windows operating systems. You can't just easily rip that out and replace it with a new browser..

  4. Dvorak just needs to go away... by Svartalf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's just another utterly clueless pundit. To have them buy Opera is to admit that they didn't have what it takes to secure and extend the thing. MS flatly won't be inclined to do that if they can help it- this suggestion is in the same class as saying MS ought to do a Linux version of MS Office.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  5. Not compatible by wombatmobile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unlikely. Opera isn't compatible with Microsoft's business strategy since it implements web standards.

  6. Why so much Dvorak by guaigean · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why does Dvorak even make it on here? I'm not trying to troll, just noticing that every Dvorak post made is a HUGE flamewar against his ignorance in computing. I mean, sure, he can have his opinion. But why does it make slashdot EVERY single time he makes a comment?

    --
    Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
  7. Re:Imagine that... by ottothecow · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And this week Dvorak pretends anti-trust laws dont exist.

    Generally, buying up your competetors (especially one of the very few competitors that could actually be bought) doesnt look so good when you've already been a convicted monopoly.

    --
    Bottles.
  8. Re:Imagine that... by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google gave Opera (and Mozilla foundation) a chunk of cash in exchange for Opera being totally free (as in no ads) and google being the preferred search engine. There could be other terms to their agreement as well...

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  9. flase premise by bokmann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    His entire argument is predicated upon the false premises that Microsoft wants to support open standards and that they want to support the Mac.

    Microsoft has virtually bottomless resources - if they really wanted to, they could crank out a secure cross-platform web browser that supported relevant standards. What Microsoft has is exactly what they want - vendor lock-in with a mediocre product that through its various 'feature-driven' incompatibilities gives them some sense of control.

    If Mircosoft can't own the roads, they want to own the potholes.