Slashdot Mirror


Wikipedia Semi-Protection Begins

seanvaandering writes "Admins began applying their recently announced 'Wikipedia semi-protection' feature this week. The first articles to be semi-protected were George W. Bush, Hitler, and Jesus Christ, barring the newest 1% of all users and anonymous visitors from modifying the article (apparently Satan didn't make the cut). Does this mark the end of the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit?"

6 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. 1st by Devistater · · Score: -1, Troll

    frst pst!

  2. Protect their pages, but not our children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I notice how wikipedia does not mind having pedophiles access our children through wikipedia, but only inserts protective measures when it benefits THEM. This dissonance is sickening, and I recommend we do something about it.

    www.theposc.com has some good information on this.

  3. Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Fuck the Wikipedia. I thought it was a great idea until I started reading the talk pages. Holy shit, those people disgust me.

  4. Re:There's some sort of joke.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Both societies were deflated

    Like your limp little doodle?

    It's even creepier when DHS agents bang on people's doors who aren't doing anything wrong.

    Maybe they know about that stuff you download from the sites that Pete Townsend only 'visited' ?

    It's creepy as hell ... but that doesn't make it any less creepy.

    Or maybe they know about that stuff you're smoking that makes every thing 'creepy' ?

  5. STFU, you (ipod, MAC, Apple) fanboy fag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    digg is for MAC and XBOX children.
    Not to mention the mediahug spamming faggot.

  6. Re:There's some sort of joke.... by shanen · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thank you for so doing.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.