Slashdot Mirror


Judge Blocks Ban on Violent Video Game Sales

dada21 writes "SFGate is reporting that a federal judge recently blocked a new California law that would have banned the sale of violent video games to minors. From the article: 'Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger had signed the bill by Assemblyman Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, to ban the sale or rental of especially violent video games to children under 18 years old unless there is parental approval. The law was to take effect Jan. 1.'"

2 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Re:great, just great by versiondub · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, they're actually supposed to interpret the constitution as it is. A federal judge interprets the federal constitution, and a state judge does the same for the state constitution. In this case, the judge found the law to be unconstitutional. Is it really that simple? Judges can block laws all they want. If their only job was to 'uphold the law' then there would all of a sudden be no debate about the patriot act etc. etc. ad nauseam. The judiciary would become little more than a rubber stamp for congress and the president.

  2. Re:Too broad of a law, correct? by wyldeone · · Score: 5, Informative

    just create a law banning the sale of video games, marked rated M or Adult, from being sold.

    They can't do that. That would be giving legislative powers to a non-governmental agency, which is illegal.

    --
    In the beginning the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and is widely considered as a bad move.