Slashdot Mirror


Challenges To Microsoft For 2006

TekkenLaw writes "Directions on Microsoft, a site which claims to be 'the only independent organization in the world devoted exclusively to tracking Microsoft', has published a list of 10 challenges for 2006 for Microsoft as a company. Top strategic issues in all areas of operation from OS to gaming are covered." From the article: "Windows Vista could offer large organizations improvements in software development, security, reliability, systems management, and user interface. However, public demonstrations have been full of cool graphics effects and consumer features that probably turn off more IT staff than they attract, and sales of Windows upgrade rights to corporations have been disappointing. In 2006, Microsoft has to settle on a feature set for Vista that appeals to enterprises, explain clearly what that feature set is, and reveal what PC hardware and other infrastructure corporations require to reap the benefits." Actually presented in a fairly respectful way, it's interesting to see the overall picture we've reported on for the past year condensed down into one page.

9 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. I like the pretty lights by RingDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "However, public demonstrations have been full of cool graphics effects and consumer features that probably turn off more IT staff than they attract"

    With the exception of Windows application developers who have been battling with GDI(+) for the last 10 years. The new graphics core of windows has been needed for a long time now.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:I like the pretty lights by toddbu · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Consumer sales are nice, but it's IT sales that drive the industry.

      Well, depends on how you look at it. Microsoft displaced IBM in corporate American because it had broad consumer appeal. Some of those consumers are IT people, and they in turn help drive the decision making process for their companies. So you need broad consumer appeal.

      Personally, I think Microsoft has fallen down by focusing too much on corporate America. Don't get me wrong - I'm not an anti-corporate guy and this isn't a corporate bashing session. It's just that if you look at Microsoft's early history, it was all about "sticking it to the man". Word processors, once the domain of large systems, was pushed to the desktop, along with spreadsheets and other corporate applications. I worked in a company where we effectively neutralized our big iron with a single desktop application. So for Microsoft to now ignore the average Joe and focus exclusively on what large companies need is totally stupid. What Microsoft needs to do is return to its roots and continue to focus on what the consumer really needs - a machine that just works. No more reboots, spyware, rootkits, or spam. Plug it in and it runs. If Microsoft could build a PC that's as reliable as my refrigerator then they would once again be in a dominate industry position.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    2. Re:I like the pretty lights by Luscious868 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "If Microsoft could build a PC that's as reliable as my refrigerator then they would once again be in a dominate industry position."
      Apple has already done it but price and compatibility matter. As long as a Dell w/ Windows is cheaper than a Mac w/ OS X companies that run Windows will probably continue to run Windows. It has it downsides, but I think for most corporate types unless there is a large cost savings they think the devil you know is better than the devil you don't.
  2. Don't screw it up! by bms20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, I'm a bit worried that they will wreck what is great about windows: Its the same (for the most part) where ever its installed. It might be hard for the slashdot community to recognize a non-computer expert, but there are a lot of them. Many of them run windows XP in the 2000 look-alike mode - specifically so that they need not learn a new "look and feel". MacOS concentrates on bling only - and this is where it fails - general users don't want zoom up icons, pan out desktops etc. What they want is just a simple environment that looks good and works the way they expect it to - and with M$ changing this it could cause many more people to stick with XP or win2k then they expect. I really wish that they'd fix the security in XP, and improve it rather than concentrate on the bling. -Brett

    1. Re:Don't screw it up! by llthomps · · Score: 5, Insightful

      MacOS concentrates on bling only - and this is where it fails - general users don't want zoom up icons, pan out desktops etc.

      Have you ever used Mac OS? The bling is there, of course. But the Mac OS right now is considerably more robust (and predictable, for that matter) than Windows has ever been in its history.

  3. Respectful? by Uukrul · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Windows Vista could offer large organizations improvements in software development, security, reliability, systems management, and user interface. However, public demonstrations have been full of cool graphics effects and consumer features
    This isn't be respectful, this is an advertisement.

    It's like when you have a job interview and they ask you to say something "bad" about yourself.
    The answers are "You work too hard", "You often take on more work than you should", "You make too many demands on yourself", ...very bad indeed.
    --
    My city: Barcelona.
  4. Re:Small to Medium Business by MSFanBoi2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Never mind the fact that your install of Sendmail doesn't have 1/5th the features of Exchange 2003 that most companies use quite often and are dependent on. Who needs calendaring?
    Who needs wireless email?
    Who needs single instance storage?
    I can go on and on... Sendmail is good as a mail gateway service, but not much else for a real company.

    Perhaps if small businesses like the one you worked for bothered investigating Select and Enterprise agreements (which do exist for even smaller companies) the costs for upgrades is very small over three years.

  5. They'll upgrade, they always do by bob2cam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole concept of making something visually appealing and powerful seems to be lost on many Linux/Windows techies. That accounts for why IT doesn't understand the visual value of Windows Vista while consumers will love it. But eventually, IT will upgrade. They always do.
    As a matter of fact you could keep the article and republish it every time a new Microsoft OS upgrade is released cause' every time an upgrade is released the media predicts the same thing. For following "blah blah blah" reasons, no one going to move from (take your pick, 3.0,3.1,3.11,W95,w98,w2000, wXP) to the latest and greatest. Eventually, everyone does, they just take their time.

  6. Re:Where's "Stop breaking the Law"? by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems that rampant Xenophobia is alive, well and being modded up on Slashdot.

    As a business owner located in the EU, I'd be very interested to see evidence of any 'harsh and irrational restraints' that I'm under, as I'm not currently aware of any.

    The EU monopoly abuse laws that Microsoft are so dismissive of are pretty much exactly the same as the US, it's just that we might actually be enforcing them.

    As for unemployment rates, our 4.7% unemployment rate here in Britain is lower than the 5.5% in the USA. The high rates (which are lower than 10% according to the US Govt.) in France and Germany have far more to do with local left-wing economic policies and the absorption of communist East Germany respectively than EU-wide laws.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a