Slashdot Mirror


Fate of High-Def DVD up to Microsoft?

BlackMesaResearchFac writes "EE Times is reporting that Microsoft may have chosen a side in the ongoing optical disk war. From the article: 'several industry sources last week told EE Times that Microsoft is muscling into the optical-disk fray by leveraging its operating-system clout to bundle HD-DVD within Vista, the company's next-generation OS. There is also talk that the software giant may be planning to offer cash incentives -- in the form "coupons" -- to system vendors or retailers if they agree to support HD-DVD. Such coupons would provide "credits" or "memos" for each PC that is sold with HD-DVD inside.'"

6 of 333 comments (clear)

  1. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Windows is dying. Netcraft confirms it.

  2. Re:Your Sig... by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually, as far as I can tell, computer scientists (and other programmers) started using foo just because fu is both too overloaded, and too short. I have yet to meet a programmer who doesn't know what FUBAR is. Spelling it "foobar" is a complete bastardization. It doesn't mean anything!

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Re:It's all about the Java by hoggoth · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    > Who is more evil?

    Ouch... you are hurting my simple decision making process. Despite whatever the groupthink de jour is, could it be that any massive corporate entity that makes more money than some nations and crosses international boundaries has the power and incentive to do 'evil' things in it's own self-interest?

    Since these entities can shift production and decision making processes between legal and economic jurisdictions at will, they are pretty much immune to any legal or economic attempts to control them.

    This state of affairs was probably inevitable once corporations were given similar legal status as human individuals.

    Too late now. Sit back and enjoy your mocha-latte.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  4. Re:Your Sig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    A preferred spelling for an acronym? Um...is it just me, or is that missing the point? Pray, in your preferred spelling, what do the O's signify? Otherwise, you're demonstrating an inability to understand what an acronym is...next you'll tell us you prefer spelling FEMA as PHEAMUH or some such.

  5. Re:Your Sig... by Surt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Please feel free to read, if you can, any of the links I provided documenting the history of foobar. I think it will adequately explain my post.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  6. Re:Your Sig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    All of the links you posted mention the acronym FUBAR - none of them defend or explain why one would type "foobar" when one means FUBAR. "foo" only came about because professors and authors didn't want to use and/or explain the "fu" part of FUBAR. Also, foo and bar make a better pair of dummy names (3 letters each) than fu and bar.

    I'm not sure what other significance you think "foobar" might have, but please just come out and state your position since the links you provided contradict your opinion.