Slashdot Mirror


Scientist Pushing for Early Use of Stem Cells

hzs202 writes "BBC News is reporting that Professor Ian Wilmut is pushing for stem cell treatment to be offered to people with terminal illnesses. Professor Wilmut told journalists that the treatment could save lives or at least speed up the pace of research, however it is yet to be fully tested." From the article: "If we wait until things are totally tested and analyzed in animals, it will deny some people treatment"

6 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Stem cells from newborns by AnonymousJackass · · Score: 5, Informative

    I learned something interesting last week from friends of my wife and I. When their daughters were born (now 4 and 6yrs old, respectively), they had stem cells taken from their umbilical cords and sent off to a facility in (I think) Texas, where they're safely stored and frozen. Apparently the thinking is that (hopefully never, but...) maybe one day one of the girls will have some kind of ailment that requires the re-growth of an organ (for example), or similar. So they will pull the stem cells out of storage and use the 'current' medical advances to hopefully cure them.
    I was amazed to find out that it is possible to do this and that people are doing it already! I think that is so cool! I meant to ask them if it cost anything, but I forgot. Anyone know?
    Just thought I'd share, since we're on the subject...

  2. Re:So... by sfjoe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Expensive drugs like AIDS treatments have found their way into the hands of plenty of poor people.

    You have a definition for the word "plenty" that I'm not familiar with.
    17 million people in Africa have died of AIDS and less than 1/10 of 1% of HIV+ people are receiving treatment. Doesn't sound like "plenty" to me.

    --
    It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
  3. Re:Something to ponder by vertinox · · Score: 4, Informative

    Certainly lots of people have heard of snake-oil. Heck, asperin was also a cure-all.

    The difference between stem cells and asperin is that all of your cells were created via stem cells (indirectly or directly) and not asperin.

    In theory, you could regenerate most (if not all) of your dead and dying body cells with stem cells because stems cells are basic building blocks of original cell generation. The reason we get sick, old, and die is because cells self replicate until they are beoyond damaged and damaged cells can only replicate damaged cells.

    Go back to the starting point and create healthy original cells via stem cell therapy and you've got young and non-damaged cells again.

    Calling stems cells a cure all is akin to calling atoms the cure all for reality. It is what we are made out of.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  4. Re:would I? by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 3, Informative

    President Bush, in 2001, halted all federal funding on stem cells outside of the already-established 78 lines. Many of those cells have been corrupted and can't be used in human trials.

    However, he did a partial reveral just recently and signed a law creating a national stem-cell bank based on umbilical cord cells. This is really good news, and hopefully will allow the US to catch up to other countries.

    --
    Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
  5. Re:So... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Education's very important, sure. And so is changing people's sexual practices. Those things are what will help much more than some wonder-drug. That said, the U.S. won't give money to education programs that don't preach abstinence. This is foolish, though it and things like it probably helped win Bush votes among Christian conservatives.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  6. Re:So... by c_forq · · Score: 2, Informative
    What's the problem? They don't make anyone very much money (except maybe condom manufacturers).

    It's more then that. Those things COST money. Condoms, needles, books, pamphlets, and teachers all cost money. In many cases the areas that need them are unable to afford them. Then comes the issue of once you have teachers how do you get people to go to them. Then once you have that solved how do you get people to believe them (I know a problem in many areas of Africa is people giving more credence to ritual and tradition then to educators.

    What's the problem? They don't make anyone very much money (except maybe condom manufacturers).

    It's not only the US. For examble
    However, in Swaziland, where nearly 40% of the nation's adults are HIV-positive, King Mswati--often criticized for not doing more to promote monogamy and condom use in the nation--canceled all World AIDS Day events. And in South Africa, home to more than 5 million HIV-positive people, the most of any country in the world, health minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang--called "Dr. No" by AIDS activists because of her opposition to antiretroviral drugs--repeated her support of eating carrots, spinach, beetroot, and garlic as the preferred way for HIV-positive people to fight their infections.http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ekt id23023.asp
    --
    Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns