Physicists Close in on 'Superlens'

An anonymous reader writes "In Oregon, physicists have developed a material for creating a real superlens that in theory could attain a one-nanometer visual resolution. The idea is to use exotic materials to create "negative" refraction of light, which literally means steering it in the opposite direction of that found in the natural world."

Comments

They've been around

[gardyloo]

I'm not sure about the resolution of the previous "negative refractive" lenses, but these things have been around for a few years. Pendry (I think) was one of the first to come up with the split-ring "metamaterial" and show that it can work, but the concept for these things has been around since Veselago came up with them, oh, about 40 years ago. People (including my advisor) have recently been proposing or demonstrating "negative refraction" acoustical materiaals, too. As far as I can make out from the summary, the OSU work is notable because this lens might work with optical frequencies, rather than in the radio and microwave regime, as previous optical metamaterials had to do.

    Incidentally, people will find better information by searching for "left-handed" and "metamaterial" rather than "negative index" on the various sites.

Negative Refraction

[HateBreeder]

I thought you can get negative refraction, when an electromagnetic wave passes through a "Metamaterial" i.e. One with Negative Permittivity and Permeability.

(for instnace, in a dispersive plasma cloud)

Re:Negative Refraction

[bw_bur]

It's not quite the first time. Zhang's group in Berkeley published a paper in spring last year (Science 308, 534-537) describing experiments on the silver superlens, which works at optical frequencies. There have been other similar experiments since then.

So what is this non-natural world?

[Flying pig]

I hate to say this (well, actually, I don't, I love to be pedantic like this) but if a real lens can be made to behave like this, then its properties are part of the "natural world". We just haven't experienced it before.

Anybody who has ever done a university course on optics and so has come across phenomena like double refraction, which is truly weird the first time you see it, will know that there are plenty of strange things in optics. But that doesn't make them unnatural.

Re:These would be nice!

[DinZy]

How can you really study atoms at the nanometer scale? Atoms are sub nanometer. The use in obsevation lies in some large molecule on large molecule action. The best use would be in making smaller features with photolithography. It may also be useful in quantum computing applications.

Not lenses - diffraction compensators!

[johst]

Being a grad student in these kind of things (optics) I just want to clarify that these super-"lenses" do not behave at all like normal lenses. Most importantly, it is impossible to obtain magnification, the image will always be exactly the same size as the object. So it's not really fair to think about them as "lenses".

A very similar thing is dispersion compensation in fiber-optical communications where the dispersion of one fiber is compensated in another with dispersion of opposite sign. This way, a signal can go through the two fibers without being distorted by the chromatic dispersion. Dispersion and diffraction (i.e. free space light propagation)are mathematically virtually the same thing, and the negative-index material is equivalent to having a fiber with dispersion of the opposite sign. So perhaps it's more right to think about the super.lenses as "diffraction-compensators"?

Is that really possible?

[timerider]

I mean, how do you get 1nm visual resolution, when the wavelength of visual light ranges from 400-800 nm?

Re:Is that really possible?

[Excors]

I remember something about this from Physics World, around five months ago. That article reports experiments in which a resolution of a quarter of the wavelength was achieved.
As far as I can tell, the idea is that diffraction doesn't work quite how it's taught in classrooms: there is a standard "far-field" portion, which is limited to a resolution equal to the wavelength of the light; but there is also a "near-field" portion, which "contains all of the sub-wavelength spatial details about an object, but ... decays quickly as a function of distance from the object". A lens with a refractive index of -1 causes an exponential increase in the near-field waves as they pass through the superlens, and so the information can be more easily recovered, giving an image with better resolution than if only the far-field light was used.
The object, lens and image all have to be located within the near-field, less than one wavelength in size, else the waves decay too much - that limits the practical applications, but it could apparently be useful for the optical storage industry.

Major advance possible.

[Belseth]

In Oregon, physicists have developed a material for creating a real superlens that in theory could attain a one-nanometer visual resolution.

Finally there'll be a way to read all the fine print in service contracts!

As a Lisp programmer

[boomgopher]

As a Lisp programmer, I chuckle at the artificial distinction between light, lenses, and refraction.

More information about their work

[philbert2.71828]

You can find more information about this research at Podolskiy's web page. It looks like the web site has some good information, including Java applets showing how a superlens should work. Incidently, I am an undergrad physics student at OSU and I talked to Poldolskiy about doing some research for him last summer, but it didn't work out. It's nice to see he got something published on this though - he was explaining it to me last year but I can't remember much of it now.

Re:These would be nice!

[theglassishalf]

Large molecule on molecule action? Man, and I thought I had seen all the fetishes.

-Daniel