Linux/Unix Tops Charts for Vulnerabilities in 2005
BeanBunny writes "I realize that this topic is almost as volatile around here as Intelligent Design, but I think this is interesting nonetheless. US-CERT has released their year-end vulnerability summary. According to InformationWeek.com, Linux/Unix (including Mac OS) had almost three times the number of OS-specific vulnerabilities reported last year compared to Microsoft Windows. Obviously, statistics are meaningless without the proper conjecture, speculation, and opinionation, so let the debate begin again over which OS is really more secure."
I'm offended by the latest comparison of and . The linked article offers no measurable insight, and is exactly the kind of flamebait that bores the
Please change your editorial practices to fit my tastes better.
ComplaintGen (R) - 2006
2,328 is a whole lot more than 812. that means that *nix et al are 1,516 fixes ahead of the competition.
You feel that sting, big boy, huh? That's pride fuckin' with you!
(source)
Karma: -2147483648 (Mostly affected by integer overflow)
You should look at the list. http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/bulletins/SB2005.html Hardly any are "rarely used games", unless "Multiple Vendors Linux Kernel Asynchronous Input/Output Local Denial Of Service" is the latest FPS...
Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
what is the down side of source code availability?
The inability to maintain a monopoly by using scare tactics?
Write boring code, not shiny code!