Slashdot Mirror


PC FM Tuner Streamed Over a LAN?

ooglek asks: "FM radio seems to be falling out of favor, with many stations putting their streams online. Unfortunately, many choose bad codecs and low bandwidth feeds, which make them practically unappealing. There seem to be a fair number of PCI-based TV Tuner cards that come with a built in FM receiver, and I'm interested in what it might take to stream my local FM stations to the Windows, Unix and Mac boxes in my house over my LAN, as well as my TiVo and Slim Devices SqueezeBox. Is this merely a pipe-dream?"

67 comments

  1. web radio is better by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

    i was just listening to fm today after listening to web radio pretty much exclusivly. 5 minutes later I realize I'm picking up two stations at the same time, which is why it sounded so weird. Why not just improve web radio, if its bad it can be upgraded.

  2. I Don't Get It by Criliric · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Doesn't anybody else have a receviver these days?
    instead of stereo into the computer I happen to have it the other way around, and if I really wanted to listen the local rock station all I have to do I press a button.
    I might be missing something but what is the point of having your computer play your radio, unless you plan on recording the banter of the DJs....

    1. Re:I Don't Get It by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i listen to howard stern daily. a radio won't work in my office, but i could easily stream from home and tune in with xmms over the net

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    2. Re:I Don't Get It by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Once you've streamed it from wherever, you could output it to an FM transmitter and listen to it on the radio. This might confuse the neighbours if you're streaming it in from outside the local area (and annoy the authorities if you use too much power).

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:I Don't Get It by Phillup · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anybody else have a receviver these days?

      Sure, it's upstairs in the living room on the opposite side of the house.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    4. Re:I Don't Get It by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Just record some asshole saying "fuck", "breasts", and "midget". Then play those sound clips randomly with a laugh track (make sure there's at least one black female laughing) in the background, perhaps with "lesbian" interjected periodically. It will be funnier *and* more insightful than Stern, but it's as close as a computer can come. Replace the laugh track with NPR for 5 minutes every half hour.

    5. Re:I Don't Get It by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      you must be either:

      1. dopey and fagotty fan
      2. clear channel employee/executive/stockholder

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
  3. Everything old... by Itninja · · Score: 1

    ..is new again.
    I am a bit troubled at this trend towards paying recurring fees to do things that have been essentially free for decades. First OTA broadcast TV, now cable. Then radio, now Sirius.
    When my children are my age opening up the fridge will be a subscription service. It will be called Digi-Chill 5000(r). I just copywrited that, so no stealing it in 30 years.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Everything old... by ChadN · · Score: 1

      The flip side is that subscription cable channels like HBO, or subscription digital radio, are not driven by commercials, and so are arguably better geared towards giving you (the customer) what you would like to see. "Free" services, like broadcast TV or radio are geared towards giving their advertisers (their customers) what they want (your eyes and ears).

      You ARE correct that the recurrant cost for "basic" CABLE which is mostly simulcast of broadcast TV, breaks that model a little. It would perhaps have been nice to only pay a one time installation fee to receive it (like with a Sirius or XM receiver), but that one time fee would most likely have been pretty hefty.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    2. Re:Everything old... by heavy+snowfall · · Score: 1

      Reminds me UBIK by Philip K. Dick, one of the characters lives in a conapt where you have to pay your door for it to open..

    3. Re:Everything old... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me that most cable stations are ad-free? Bullshit. Cable may have started out that way, and digital radio will not be far behind.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:Everything old... by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      i doubt it. well, i doubt pay radio will get as bad (comparatively) as pay television

      the costs associated with producing television content are drastically higher than the costs associated with producing radio content. what's radio content? most stations (or channels on the sat services) are just computer generated/managed music playlists that require little human intervention. talk formats don't demand nearly as many human resources as their television counterparts

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    5. Re:Everything old... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disney was ad-free, now its not. AMC was ad free, now its not. Except for the handful of movie channels, the vast majority of cable channels (cable-only, non-broadcast) are loaded with commercials. You pay to get them, and they have commercials.

      Even with satellite radio, not all of the stations are commercial free.
      You pay to go see movies, and they have more and more product placement.

      Make no mistake - 95% of media companies plans for new revenue streams involve getting people to pay more for what they already have.

      1. eliminate fair-use
      2. introduce new tech regularly to obsolete old, requiring you to re-buy everything
      3. DRM, so you have to buy the same thing repeatedly for different devices.
      4. DRM introduced to over the air broadcasts so you cant record even though the law permits it
      5. increases in length of copyright of already produced works - stealing from public domain so they can charge long for work created in 1929
      4. reinterpretation of copyright law to disallow fair use of music snippets even a fraction of a second long - people have to pay to sample a simple "bleep."
      5. locking down cell phones plus #4, so you have to buy the 3 seconds of your favorite tune for a buck a second for a ringtone rather than xfering it yourself.
      6. self-destructing DVDs
      7. fighting google's indexing of books (even though it wouldnt enable you to read the whole thing) because publishers plan to introduce a pay-per-page program of their own.
      8. attempts to ban sales of used CDs and books.

      The list goes on and on. The head of the RIAA even admitted several years ago that their goal is pay-per-play - you will no longer buy an album, you will pay every single time you listen to a song.

      EVERYTHING is moving towards a subscription-based model, simply because it increases the eventual cost to consumers a hundredfold, yet is relatively easy to pass off to consumers.

      --
      This space available.
    6. Re:Everything old... by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oooh, looks like there's going to be trouble since your Digi-Chill 5000 is very similar to my Digi-Cool 6000. Of course, mine must be better due to the higher number.

    7. Re:Everything old... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "the costs associated with producing television content are drastically higher than the costs associated with producing radio content."
      They may be higher but why do they need to be so expensive?
      Digtal video has dropped the cost of producing video. You can get a good digital camcorder for around $2000 "Cannon GL2". There is open source Digital Video editing software. Blender and Gimp for titling and rendering...
      Actors are not that expensive. Most of the costs have to do with the production companies.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  4. (Not so) Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FM PCI card + Total Recorder + Shoutcast.

    Or you could just try one of those Radio Sharks, which actually seems like what you want.

  5. Use Nicecast by TTop · · Score: 2, Informative

    Capture the FM audio with your tuner card on a Mac. Then use Nicecast to stream it. Nicecast can basically stream any audio on your Mac.

    1. Re:Use Nicecast by thedak · · Score: 1

      I am having the hardest time figuring out how the parent got modded troll. It was a serious response when he had mentioned he has a Mac on his network, and nicecast is a very good web streaming software that could be connected to by any of his other systems (iTunes if you like, winamp, xmms and really any other media player can handle the stream from nicecast). Yet.. because he mentions the Mac option from his network, he's a troll.. right..

  6. Wouldn't be much better by JacquesPinette84 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The thing is, the radio station has a clean signal to work with. Compression algorithms will work relitively well with that, but if you use the audio that comes from F.M. it will introduce alot of noise. This won't work as well as with the clean signal and in the end you'll probably have use more bandwidth just to broadcast the same audio at about the same quality.

    1. Re:Wouldn't be much better by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Why bother compressing it? 16-bit stereo is only about 1.5 Mbps.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  7. USB radioshark + icecast + liveice by zfalcon · · Score: 5, Informative
    I just set this up the other day so I could listen to local sports broadcasts when out of town.

    I bought a USB Radioshark, set it up under Linux, and used Icecast with Liveice to setup realtime streaming.

    I then setup a cgi to change stations. Works like a charm.

    1. Re:USB radioshark + icecast + liveice by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      I agree Icecast or Shoutcast is the best way to go, you can take almost any input and then stream it as a normal mp3 stream. I've done this with both my mp3 collection and input from my music channels on the cable box.

      I use it to listen to MP3s at work streaming from my home box. Or if you get board you can be your own DJ on shoutcast.com ;)

    2. Re:USB radioshark + icecast + liveice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great! How about putting a little report of how you did it up somewhere?

  8. Kinda OT: I remember doing this many moons ago by szyzyg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd got snapped up from my astronomy position in the UK to come and contract for a couple of months in the US, I'd been developing software like mp3serv/liveice/icecast. But, I didn't want to leave behind UK radio - like the Essential Mix, John Peel or The Breezeblock - the BBC website offered low quality real audio. I left my radio plugged into my computer at the observatory and streamed all the UK radio across the atlantic to my office in the US....

    Sadly... I don't have an office in the UK any more so I guess my best bet now is Sirius radio.

    1. Re:Kinda OT: I remember doing this many moons ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can find stuff like the Essential Mix on p2p networks.

  9. Beyond TV 4 by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    I believe Beyond TV 4 can do it. Or at the very least, record shows which then become available for streaming over the web interface on port 8129.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  10. Yeah, it's easy with by Hextreme · · Score: 1

    VideoLan Client (bad naming, but it can both receive network streams and originate them) http://www.videolan.org/ They even have precompiled clients for most popular OSes and distributions.

  11. Dead Dead Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, three articles in a row: US arcades are dead, DVD is dead, now FM is dying. Is Slashdot also dead, using their logic?

  12. Easy, if you're willing to Think Different(TM) by gellenburg · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. A Mac Mini (you'll understand why in a minute.)
    2. A USB FM Tuner (that's supported by the Mac). Google. There's a few out there.
    3. NiceCast, (or Air Foil) from Rogue Amoeba. www.rogueamoeba.com

    Simple. Seamless. That's the beauty of the Mac. :-)

    1. Re:Easy, if you're willing to Think Different(TM) by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      I realise you're fond of your mac, but do you realise how absurd your suggestion is? Buying a mac mini JUST to stream radio? There may be many reasons to buy a mac, but just to stream radio is a pretty weak one.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    2. Re:Easy, if you're willing to Think Different(TM) by Phillup · · Score: 1

      A Mac Mini

      he already has the clients...

      A USB FM Tuner

      And seems to favor PCI tuners...

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    3. Re:Easy, if you're willing to Think Different(TM) by CyberZen · · Score: 1

      Or he could, you know, use the Mac he already owns...

      and I'm interested in what it might take to stream my local FM stations to the Windows, Unix and Mac boxes in my house over my LAN, as well as my TiVo and Slim Devices SqueezeBox. Is this merely a pipe-dream?

  13. Slightly off-topic- streaming all audio by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 1

    This is slightly off topic, but just the other day I submitted an ask slashdot asking how it might be possible to stream my entire audio session from one PC to another. My main desktop has no soundcard, no space to put one, and no speakers; my Media center PC has all of those, but I don't use it as my main PC. I'm looking for a solution that will allow me to stream the audio from my main desktop to my Media Center and play it there. (They're in the same room, just beside each other, for intrests sake) Any ideasd?

    --
    "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    1. Re:Slightly off-topic- streaming all audio by Hextreme · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could try EsounD. It's standard on Linux Gnome desktops, and I believe there's windows stuff out there for it. I know there's a WinAmp plugin for it.

    2. Re:Slightly off-topic- streaming all audio by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Not the solution you're looking for, but there are a variety of USB audio devices available from soundcards to speakers...

    3. Re:Slightly off-topic- streaming all audio by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 1

      That's very interesting- unfortunately it says it requires a working audio device, and I don't have one- there's no audio drivers, no sound card, no nothing. The only audio I have is the terminal-services sound redirector. (which is great for everything except gaming and multiple-displays- the two of the things I use that PC for almost 100 percent of the time.)

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    4. Re:Slightly off-topic- streaming all audio by munpfazy · · Score: 1

      What OSes do the two devices run?

      And, to satisfy curiousity, what on earth have you made your desktop out of that it doesn't have either built in sound or spare pci slots?

    5. Re:Slightly off-topic- streaming all audio by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

      Export the media on the other PC so the Windows Media Center PC can see it.

    6. Re:Slightly off-topic- streaming all audio by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 1

      I've already done that. I'm talking about audio streams for which that's not possible- like for example the streaming audio that games put out, or the sounds that gaim makes when a new message comes in.

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    7. Re:Slightly off-topic- streaming all audio by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      You need a sound device on the sound-playing device. On the sound-originating device you need no such thing. If the application you play sound with has support for esd (many do), you just need to set the ESPEAKER environment variable to the hostname of the machine running esd (your media machine) and run as usual. If the app doesn't support esound directly, you can launch the app with "esddsp" as a wrapper (as in esddsp soundapp -argument -argument) - it basically intercepts calls to /dev/dsp.

      There are other similar solutions. Specifically, the KDE project uses arts, because Gnome uses esd and the KDE people in the grand tradition of gnome/kde interaction had to develop their own slightly different system (yeah, arts can use esound). Arts has network sound support, a wrapper (artsdsp), etc.

      Then there's the network audio system - http://nas.codebrilliance.com/. It works on Windows and Linux.

      Depending on what app you're generating the sound with, you could even redirect the sound to icecast and use the media center to tune to your local "web radio" station.

      Personally, I use esd because it comes with most distros, is fairly simple to configure, and isn't a huge hassle to debug (stopped working? the daemon probably exited - just restart it). It works well for consolidating the sound output of all of my headless machines that I occasionally log into over remote connections. Not that sound is really that useful most of the time, but sometimes I need to hear a bell when something's done, etc...

    8. Re:Slightly off-topic- streaming all audio by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 1

      Fascinating, thanks! It doesn't sound perfect, but something I can probably twist to my own ends. As to your last point, that's pretty much exactly what I need it for. it's a shame VNC doesn't support audio. (Or at least, I haven't been able to find a server/client that does.) Anyway, I will fiddle with your suggestions. Thanks.

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
  14. Put a radio on top of your PC by SIGFPE · · Score: 4, Informative

    I assure you it sounds fine. Well, you might want to move it slightly away from your PC to avoid interference. If you want to listen in many rooms buy a radio for each one - they're pretty cheap. Or buy a portable radio that you can carry with you.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  15. Screaming Radio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sadly... I don't have an office in the UK any more so I guess my best bet now is Sirius radio."

    Find a mate in the UK who will set up a streaming radio.

    There's radio via the C/Ku band as well.

  16. how about rebroadcating rights and licensing fees by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

    So far all the replies have been technical in nature, but let us not forget we live in a very legalistic society. I don't think you can legally stream broadcast radio over the internet withouth re-broadcast rights etc.. So before going through all this hassle to set this up, how about checking the legal ramifications first.

    Just a thought.

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
  17. how about rebroadcating from my house. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There seem to be a fair number of PCI-based TV Tuner cards that come with a built in FM receiver, and I'm interested in what it might take to stream my local FM stations to the Windows, Unix and Mac boxes in my house over my LAN, as well as my TiVo and Slim Devices SqueezeBox. [emphasis mine]"

    Within the confines of ones house, not over the Internet. Now if he had streamed it over the internet to his place of work, that might be more questionable from a couple standpoints.

  18. legal aspects... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    That was my first thought as well. With new technologies like GNU software radio, the lines between "rebroadcasting" and "using" can become blurred.

    I definitely have the right to use anything within the confines of my house. But, if I setup an antenna and let my neighbors connect their radios to it, am I "rebroadcasting"? If I setup a GNU radio box and send the (undecoded) signals out over the internet, am I "rebroadcasting"? What if I only send them to myself?

    And, more importantly, why should radio and TV stations really give a damn anyways? Their services are supported by ad-revenue. If anything, I'm only helping to increase their viewership by rebroadcasting.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    1. Re:legal aspects... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the stations don't care as much as the various artists guilds. They want a cut whenever their stuff gets used. The radio stations pay a cut, and legit web broadcasters pay the fees as well.

  19. Easy. by mebob · · Score: 1

    I've been doing it for a while. I steamed 92.3 formerly WXRK, home of Howard Stern to work pc all the time. Now I really don't have a reason too.

    I use an old ISA card called radiotrack and a shoutcast server.

    --
    =1000101
  20. How bad can these streams be? by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 1

    Seriously, FM radio isn't exactly pristine quality to begin with.

    I'd think even common 64kbit MP3 streams from a clean source at the radio station would probably sound better than a high bitrate stream generated locally from the noisy distorted signal you could receive over the air and digitize.

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    1. Re:How bad can these streams be? by JackDW · · Score: 1

      At least in the UK, analogue FM radio is much better than that. Recently, a digital standard has been introduced for radio (DAB). Unfortunately, it is so compressed (128kbit MP3 level) that hifi people are sticking with the far better analogue signal, which approaches (and perhaps even surpasses) CD quality, if you have a decent receiver and a rooftop aerial. "Decent receiver" is not a PCI card inside a box of noisy electronics, though!

      --
      You're an immobile computer, remember?
  21. how about orb? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    Orb streamign software They have/offer a free streaming server/client thingie (for both video and audio)... I realize that's only part ofthe solution, but hey..

    The rub with most TV card FM tuners (unless i'm mistaken) is that you can't concurrently use the FM tuner and the TV tuner (often they share the same ADC or mpeg2 encoding "bus" )

    I've been thinking of doing the same thing except re-encoding sirius/howard for personal use/personal podcasting/timeshifting but only looked at what's involved quickly...

    e

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  22. Casting: VLC or Oddcast by LordMyren · · Score: 1

    There's two main options. VLC will stream anything, simple as day, its fan-freaking-tastic. Really, VLC streaming is just superb.

    On the other hand, there's icecasting/shoutcasting. you should be able to get a JACK stream from the FM tuner, in which case you can pickup Oddsock's Oddcast to stream it to an Oddcast/Icecast server; the server will require editing a couple lines of an xml config to get running properly but its not hard. There's plenty of other options for streaming to Icecast, I just happen to like Oddcast/JACK since its so low latency and can be configured while live. JACK is just a low latency patch-board, it can be useful. OTOH, it does take some actual CPU usage to run; liveice could potentially give you better results if you have a static setup and know you wont want to do anything else but listen to the FM stream.

    Good luck, happy hacking.
    Myren

  23. Where are the wideband SDRs? by Myself · · Score: 1

    C'mon, let me just suck in the whole band from 88-108MHz and separate the stations in software. Then I'd only need one "tuner" for a whole fleet of clients, and everybody could pick their own program.

    And monitoring every station's RDS feed simultaneously would be a fun trick.

    1. Re:Where are the wideband SDRs? by Jonner · · Score: 1
      C'mon, let me just suck in the whole band from 88-108MHz and separate the stations in software.

      You mean like with GNU Radio? It sounds like it would take some real DIY (or expensive) hardware and probably not insignificant CPU cycles, but it would be cool.
  24. New Ask Slashdot Requirement by dave1g · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is actually an interesting question and so were some others in the past.

    I think the submitters should be force into developing a simple webpage that details what they did based on the knowledge slashdot gave them.

    Heck, they could put it on ehow.com they have a wiki how to website http://wiki.ehow.com/Main-Page

    1. Re:New Ask Slashdot Requirement by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Agreed, that would be helpful. I would be interested in quickly documenting some things I figured out myself, but to do that I would like to have some Wiki or Blog service that allows uploading files as well.

      Do any of those exist?

      X.

    2. Re:New Ask Slashdot Requirement by dave1g · · Score: 1

      the oen i mentioned lets you upload pictures, not sure if it will do any random file, never tried.

      of course if you want i think you could upload it to the wikimedia commons.

  25. Squeezebox & Icecast by Xenna · · Score: 1

    I have a Squeezebox myself and I've thought about doing this. Actually, I'd like to get rid of my stereo system as a whole and just use the Squeezebox with powered speakers.

    I've asked this question on the Slim Devices list and the answer was that, no, the slimserver doesn't do this (that would be best), but it can be done with IceCast (or any other package that does shoutcast streams). The Squeezebox and most other systems can play shoutcast MP3 streams so that would be the solution.

    You could write a nice Perl plugin for SlimServer to do the tuning.

    As a client for computer systems I'd use the excellent SoftSqueeze (Multi-platform Java).

    X.

  26. Hardware Solution by DaemonTW · · Score: 1
    Probably not quite what you want, but I've used an Instreamer before to digitise audio and distribute it across a LAN. It's not exactly cheap but works well and simple to use.

    Otherwise, you could write / find some software to suit (I ended up writing my own). All I did was write a simple app that fed raw PCM data across a UDP socket and some playback software at the other end. With less than 20ms overall latency it was pretty good for near realtime usage, and used a very small amount of bandwith (8kHz signal, 16 bit).

    --
    www.techwatch.com.au
  27. Currently doing it with XM by irrelevant · · Score: 3, Informative

    Right now, I'm doing this with my XM receiver (shh... don't tell them) to tune and stream audio throughout the house. I used to do this for FM as well but the server that was running it crashed and I haven't gotten around to redoing that part yet.

    Why do it for XM? I like to listen to music anywhere in the house and I don't want to pay multiple subscription fees. Why for FM? The main reason was to get the audio into the computer and converted to MP3 so that I could record a few programs that I like and listen to them later. Streaming was just an added bonus for me at that time.

    The basics of what you will need are:
    1. An FM tuner card
    2. Software for tuning (depends on card)
    3. aumix for twiddling mixer settings
    4. Darkice to read audio from the card
    4a. Lame, or other CODEC of choice (optional)
    5. Liveice to stream audio to clients
    6. A little bit of fiddling to make it all work.

    1. Re:Currently doing it with XM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy howdy that's complicated.

      I stream XM thusly:

      1) XM radio connected to the line-in port.
      2) Windows Media encoder set to take the line-in and stream it to the LAN/WLAN. I use this primarily to stream to a pocketPC with a wireless card. It is Windows Media natively. Another encoder could also be used.
      3) Total Recorder set with assorted automatic timers to record XM programs and make MP3s.
      4) Total Recorder also set to record assorted web radio stations and make that into MP3s.

      On the to-do list is putting in a USB IR emitter so I can change XM channels remotely.

  28. Not likely by Shelled · · Score: 1
    "FM radio seems to be falling out of favor, with many stations putting their streams online."

    Uh-huh. Tell that to radio sales department where I work, I'm sure they'll get a kick out of hearing the service they give away as added value is supplanting the over-the-air signal which pays everyone's mortgage. Streaming has been a burden for most radio stations which make little, is any, money from it. FM is a highly efficient and cost effective means honed over decades to distribute 'music-data' from a single point to many destinations. Don't expect to see the transmitters turned off any time soon.

  29. Same thing w/ Yahoo LAUNCHCast Radio? by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

    I have sort of a similar question. Yahoo still hasn't provided LAUNCHCast support for Safari/ Macintosh (or even Firefox/ IE users on Mac, for that matter) users. My girlfriend has an iBook, and enjoyed using LaunchCast's free service in the past, but now, of course she can't use it. I set her up with an account on my home server, running Server 2k3, so she could try to listen through RDP, but the quality is pretty bad/ it's choppy. Is there anything easy/ free that I could use to set up an audiostream served from my server, so it'll be buffered, so she'll get at least decent sound quality. Even if it has to stop to buffer occasionally, that's better than it just cracking up.

    On the same note, I bet this fella could do the same thing. Have some sort of software that just grabs the audio output from the tuner's software, and streams it over his home network. I just have no clue what software to use.

    --
    Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
  30. Hmmm... OK Weirdo Question For Sure... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    FM audio is pretty low quality to begin with. The compression that stations use (audio engineering compression, not data) tends to bollocks up the sound compared to what you hear from a CD. So I don't see how web radio is much different. The streams online are the equivalent of FM in most cases with the exception of talk radio where you don't need quality (in either content or audio integrity ;P ). But in answer to your question, I would say look for a tuner that is supported by the ALSA project. As long as that tuner's radio signal can be read from /dev, you should be fine. Then use the Xine media player with its --broadcast option to broadcast the audio stream to any other Xine player on your network.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  31. VNC or WME by major.morgan · · Score: 1

    I believe that the ATI AIW cards that have FM capability show up as another audio source in Windows, you should hopefully be able to use that as your input into either VLC or Windows Media Encoder to stream. You can use Remote Desktop or VNC to control the software (this is the simple answer from someone who doesn't code). Otherwise why not just run an FM tuner into the line-in jack.

  32. FM Over Cable. by WoTG · · Score: 1

    You can also receive most local radio stations over FM on the cable company's signal -- at least in my part of the woods. It's pretty good quality -- far better than over the air, and probably better than the low-bit rate MP3 streams.