Slashdot Mirror
Is LPRng Project Still Alive?
deeptrout asks: "The LPRng distribution hasn't been updated since mid-2004, the LPRng project website hasn't been updated since late 2004, and the LPRng mailing list has been dead since the April of 2005. What's going on? Is the project unofficially dead? Has anyone heard any news from Patric Powell, the author of LPRng? It'd be a shame if that is true. I really like LPRng's simple and yet robust reimplementation of the LPD model that allows to keep the configuration for an entire site with hundreds of hosts and dozens of printers in a fairly simple text file. What are we supposed to do now? Switch to CUPS? Something else?"
"What are we supposed to do now? Switch to CUPS?"
Simply because it has been the de facto standard for a decade? Of course not.
What do you think?
"Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
Turns out there is a small problem with DNF compatibility holding things up. Supposedly once that is fixed it'll be released the next day.
Surviving members of a project generally have a better idea than the community at large.
Yes, but all of the LPR developers were killed off Unix sysadmin who was driven into madness after configuring, troubleshooting, configuring, troubleshooting lpr onto his systme.
94% of Repubs and 21% of Dems voted to renew the Patriot Act
I think the real problem here is a lack of GGPS with a LDN. I can't even begin to understand what they were thinking when they made this change. It is completely impossible to follow a GST when the DOK isn't present. What I really think we need is more clarity in the RTY. When you omit the meaning of an RTY the result is something that is completely incomprehnsivle to the user. I think this should be a lesson to all.
Sorry, had to say it...
Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?