Slashdot Mirror


Firefox for Intel Macs Planned for March

daria42 writes "Although there are unofficial builds already available, Mozilla will release an official version of Firefox for Intel Mac OS X in March, developer Josh Aas says. There are only a couple of minor bugs to work through, such as Flash and Java support."

8 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Mozilla Sends Hidden Message to Hackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A file named "Please Spread Firefox.kext" has been located in the pre-release versions.

  2. Why so difficult? by orzetto · · Score: 4, Funny
    There are only a couple of minor bugs to work through, such as Flash and Java support.

    Is it so difficult to toggle them off already?

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    1. Re:Why so difficult? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 4, Funny

      \lim_{x\to8}\frac{1}{x-8}=\infty \qquad\Rightarrow\qquad \lim_{x\to5}\frac{1}{x-5}=\rotatebox{90}{\mbox{5} }

      I don't know what's sadder, that you tried to make a visual pun by encoding it in TeX, or that I understood it.

  3. Re:rosetta question by Belseth · · Score: 2, Funny
    Anyone know what sort of performance hit there is running the current Firefox release under Rosetta? I mean, do the Flash ads stutter or anything?

    I hear the companies using spyware are up in arms and threatening a boycott if they don't improve spyware support in Firefox under Rosetta. The upload performance is so poor it just isn't worth infecting Intel Macs. They're hoping the final release of the Intel Mac Firefox will resolve this issue.

  4. Oh Please by zo219 · · Score: 1, Funny

    "There are only a couple of minor bugs to work through, such as Flash and Java support."

    Oh, right. Really minor.

    And when he's done with that, could someone who's used a Mac please do something about the most hideous set of themes extant. Pink kitties? Wood-grain? Patriotic Netscape?

    I'm serious. What planet do these people live on? . . . Maybe we Mac users are some kind of snobby elite. Maybe we just have taste. Maybe Mozilla-Gnomey types need professional help. Whatever it is, it's a damn shame, particularly now.

  5. Flash and Java support by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 4, Funny

    "There are only a couple of minor bugs to work through, such as Flash and Java support."

    I knew it that Flash and Java support were bugs all along.

  6. Re:When will devs learn ? by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 2, Funny

    Flash and Java support are NOT minor bugs.

    Flash and Java support are MAJOR bugs.

    --
    I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
  7. Business model for de-implementing Flash (R)(tm) by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Remove the kid(s)
    2. Flash issues solved
    3. ????
    4. Profit!


    I'm still amazed people have kids. It's so last century.
    Just imagine a beowulf cluster of those! *shudder*