Slashdot Mirror
Taiwanese Parliament votes Against Microsoft
linumax writes "Taiwan's parliament has voted to end its dependence on Microsoft software, demanding that the government reduce purchases from the software giant by 25 percent this year. The resolution, passed on Friday, is an attempt by the island's law-making body to end the near monopoly Microsoft has with local government offices, a legislative aide said. Local newspaper Commercial Times said however that the resolution may not be binding because it runs against fair trade regulations in Taiwan. Officials at Taiwan's Fair Trade Commission declined to comment."
> Microsoft offers China software for their missile guiding systems and naval fleet.
And, along with a number of other big name US companies, helps China censor the internet.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
If past form is anything to go by Ballmer or another senior executive will be booking their flights to head down and do a deal. Expect a large discount to be forthcoming that would allow the government to continue with its purchasing and still meet the 25 per cent target. It's happened before but the question is how long Microsoft can continue along that route. Discounting is all very well but once more governments get in on the game it's going to start costing. Why is it one supposes that Microsoft seems to move faster when a government threatens to stop sales than when they threaten it with an enquiry? This tells you a lot about the effectiveness of competition regulations in a WTO world.
> They can replace it with OSX computers, thus spending a lot more money in the process, or they can use some Linux variety which will not support most of the software they need, requiring custom solutions and ports, thus spending a lot more money in the process. So which one will it be?
The real question is, do they want to save a lot of money in the short run or a hell of a lot in the long run?
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
use some Linux variety which will not support most of the software they need, requiring custom solutions and ports, thus spending a lot more money in the process.
Who said freedom was cheap?
Besides, this would be a one-time cost that would get them off the Microsoft upgrade treadmill - a cost that would pay for itself in time.
MS has serious corporate affairs problems and its lobbying strategies are part of the game.
E.g. in Europe: When MS gets the scum of US lobbying to Europe and they are unable to adapt to Europe, no wonder parliament rejects them. Even EU-Commissioner Wallström spoke negatively about Microsoft:
"And I was very disappointed to learn that Microsoft has agreed to block Chinese blog entries that use words like democracy, freedom, human rights and demonstration." It seems like Microsoft is not alone in "bad company"." -- which implies the Commissioner openly called MS a "bad company".
Guess Taiwan will also be excited about those MS-"relations" to China.
--
I mean, look at political radicals like DCI/TechCentralStation, or persons like Jonathan Zuck or Hugo Lueders which served Microsoft's interests in lobbying. No wonder they lose.
Whenever Ms is in trouble they hire a whole universe of unsound lobbyists which poisons their reputation in Parliament. Like the tobacco industry.
Media hates Microsoft, loves anti-MS stories. Everybody knows Microsoft and its products. Good for nasty stories.
Microsoft lobbyists usually do serious mistakes which fire back on Microsoft.
What will those idiots do now? Hire everybody they can get and further ruin their reputation in Taiwan. Hire lobbyists which will execute the strategy the public expects. What will civil society do? Gratulate MS for the great aid to their lobbying efforts.
XP a factor for a long, long time still? I thought Microsoft had some sort of support/redundancy cycle that very much prevented such a thing, especially if maintaining security is a concern to the customer, and XP has been around for a few years now.
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ tw.html
22,894,384 (2005) in population, 13+ million people are online. Making legislative body to make policy against a major player in computing industry (Microsoft in this case), may create one of the most damaging ripple for Microsoft.
Although that 13.8 million internet users won't turn off their Windows machines over night, but it's plausable to tinker with the idea that Taiwanese government may legislate a similar policy to goverment contractors and corporations dealing business with Taiwanese government to enforce private sectors to depend less on Microsoft product. And knowning China and her relationship with Microsoft, this may be interesting to see how Chinese government will react to this plausable senario.
"Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
The dutch saying however is superior, naturally being dutch, as it neatly combines with the other saying "a drop in a bucket". Wich is used often to show something having little to no effect. True or not, enough drops and the bucket still overflows. I think the english version is a crack in the armor? One crack doesn't matter but they add up until your standing naked on a battlefield.
Anyway all the crap about Fair Trade should tell you the opposition is really grasping at straws. Fair Trade Regulations are for enforcing against your enemies NEVER for restricting yourselve. Airbus VS Boeing. Europe and America both heavily subsidize the respective companies and both call foul when the other does it. Same with farm subsidies.
This is just another tiny wakening up as the world realises that having all IT tied up by one company is perhaps not the smartest move ever made.
Oh and all the people crying that MS will just do X or the US goverment will stop it or it will never happen. Straws on camels and drops in buckets remember. It all adds up.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
You are right, your comment is crap. Getting out of the dependency on a single company as it is now exists with Microsoft is reason enough -- no matter where that company is based. Whether or not there are problems with the US (there are, and not surprisingly so) might be a factor, but by far not as important as the problems of single vendor lock in that already exist and will become bigger in the future unless something is done against it now.
"Who said freedom was cheap?"
:)
So you're saying it's not costs that matter for a government, it's abstract values.
Also, who said Linux is freedom*. The value of open source depends largely on what you want to use it for.
The value of being able to tinker with your OS is as much of value to a businessman/clerk as it is to you to tinker with your internal organs for the fun of it.
If you want freedom throw your PC through the window and run naked in the park.
*I suppose that'd be my karma suicide for daring to flame on linux
China's politics on their own are already screwed up enough. Frankly it seems to suffer from an advanced case of split personality. This is nothing unusual, many "goverments" do things that seem to be at odds with each other but china just does it to the extreme. How can you really combine capatlism and communism in one country? By not looking to closely at policies that seem to contradict each other. Instead you just go with the flow and hope it all works out. Sorta like most of human history. So they shot some protesting students when it went a bit out of control. Name one country in the world that has not killed peacefull protestors since the end of WW2.
Taiwan is a point of pride but for the immidiate future it is like what cuba is to america. Exactly why does America still boycot cuba? By now it should be clear it ain't working in fact it only shows to the world exactly how america thinks of anyone that does not do exactly as it tells them. Bad PR but giving in will make the americans loose face.
Same with China and Taiwan. It makes China look bad constantly as no discussion about China is complete without someone bringing up taiwan but China giving in would cause to much loss of face.
So your suggestion of anything happening is absurd. if anything considerings china push of red flag linux this could be seen by the insane as a move by taiwan to please China.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
The article doesn't say that the govenrment must reduce the use of the Windows OSes; just Microsoft software, so Taiwan could just use different databases, office suites, etc
The worst bit is that someone apparently broke the connection Computer == Windows. This is bad. Kinda like thinking in america Democracy == Capatalism. They got a place in Cuba for people like that.
To many people even the suggestion of running another OS runs into a brick wall as computers is Windows. An alternative OS to them is XP or 98 or 2000. This example is even clearer when it comes to office software. Just try sending your CV to anyone in a non MS word format. Like eh RTF? A MS format? Documents == MS Word.
This is very handy. It causes a kinda loop, because everyone runs windows everything only works with windows so people buy windows so that their stuff will work and because nobody buys anything else then windows nothing else is supported. Cue endless loop.
UNTIL someone throws a spanner into the works and decides that they are going to run another OS. Oh one doesn't matter, he/she will just have to adapt or die. "Very nice OS you written their Mister Torvalds but what you going to do with eh? All software available is for Windows and won't run on your OS."
Luckily Mister Stallman had been working on lots of pieces of software and it met up and spawned Linux (or to keep Mr Stallman happy GNU/Linux).
Slowly the almost complete dominance of MS on the desktop started to crumble. Oh sure, a fraction of a percentage at first but remember, the biggest avalance starts with a single snowflake. Except that MS doesn't fear an avalance. It fear a snowball.
Why? As long as it has/had 99% of the market it could dictate its standards on the rest of the world. Internet Explorer is a clear example. Your website MUST work on IE. MS doesn't feel like supporting all the features of PNG image format? Then it isn't usable. Oh sure Mozilla can show some nice demos of what is possible but what is the use? IE doesn't support it.
Throw in a lot of unique features into IE and you will create that loop again. If you want to view 100% of websites you better be running IE and because everyone uses IE websites can use the unique features that handily force everyone to run IE. And so on.
The Linux freaks, BSD zombies and Mac faggots on their own are bad enough neatly reducing MS dominance by easily 5%. Oh wow, 5%, MS must be quaking in its boots, somebody setup a collection fund for Bill Gates kids so they can buy some shoes.
Very funny BUT it does matter, not because MS is going to go bankrupt but because the loop is being broken. IF 5% of you potential web customers do not run IE at any cost do you still code your website to make use of IE only features? This is a bit like asking, if 5% of your supermarket customers are in wheelchair or use a rollator do you build an extra wide entrance to allow them entry or do you let them go to the competitor who does?
It is becoming easier and easier to surf the net without IE.
And this is just with a tiny percentage changing. Now 25% of all goverment desktops switching? Yikes. You know this might mean that goverment sites actually become mandatory visible in non-ie browsers. Shock HORROR! It could mean that ideas like using MS passport for identification with your local goverment (actually proposed) would be impossible.
MS has survived a long time because if you wanted to do IT you had to do windows. IF this changes and MS will really face competition where a person can go in a store and choose his OS on preference NOT because his software on runs on one of them that would force MS to compete on quality.
That has MS very worried indeed.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
When choosing an operating system for government use, particularly in areas such as law enforcement, taxation, military, or legislative administration, the choice between open and closed source operating systems boils down to national security.
By choosing an open source system such as Linux, a nation has the power to audit and fix holes in the operating system which leave the government open to espionage. Choose Windows, and you will have to count on an American company to keep your computers secure from such glaring problems as the WMF bug. Choose Windows, and you will have to hope that American intelligence agencies and Microsoft billionaires and their buddies are honest enough to proactively discover problems, inform you of them, and fix them. Choose Windows, and you bank on Microsoft spending its money towards improving its existing products, (through, for example, exhaustive security audits), as opposed to earmarking that money towards ridiculous expansionistic endeavors into other business markets (too many to list here), and polishing up the next versions of their cash cows: Office and Windows.
Now, interestingly enough, this argument can be expanded to encompass concerns about corporate espionage. Do you trust your corporate secrets to Bill Gates?
If I was a MP in Taiwan, I'd introduce legislation to BAN government use of proprietary, closed-source operating systems. It's a matter of national security.
So you're saying it's not costs that matter for a government, it's abstract values.
I didn't say anything of the sort. I simply stated that making a larger up-front investment in your IT infrastructure to save an ongoing cost would be cheaper in time. "freedom" in the context I used it refers to freedom from vendor lockin and forced upgrades through end-of-lining support of products.
The value of being able to tinker with your OS is as much of value to a businessman/clerk as it is to you to tinker with your internal organs for the fun of it.
No, but I'm fucking glad that there are a whole host of people out there who I could pay to work on my internal organs for me should they go wrong.
Are you seriously suggesting that because the businessman doesn't know about code that it is valueless for him to be able to pay someone with the skill to do it for him, rather than be at the mercy of a single vendor?
*I suppose that'd be my karma suicide for daring to flame on linux :)
I rather suspect if you were downmodded it's due to your points being extremely shallow and making very little sense.
Also, who said Linux is freedom?
I rest my case...
--
... "
s c_sup_01_15_10_1.html (USC, TITLE 15 > CHAPTER 1, aka 'Sherman Act')
From http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f4900/4909.htm (Microsoft Conclusions of Law and Final Order, May 98)
"The Court having entered judgment in accordance with the Findings of Fact and the Conclusions of Law on April 3, 2000, that Microsoft has violated 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C., as well
--
From http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/u
1. Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty
2. Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty
--
So under what set of FUD is it that you beleive MS is *not* a convicted monopolist? Pay close attention to #2 there of the Sherman Act.
I dunno about the OP, but I would prefer to have free and open competition for OS. Unfortunately, we havent had that for at least a decade now - MS has and continues to see to that by its use of monopolistic lock-in strategies that prevent potential customers from objectively evaluating multiple options - since their data is in secret-proprietary MS format, and/or their business partners are only willing/able to communicate using secret proprietary MS formats, they have no choice but to use MS, even if it is a royal suck-ass POS. Add in that MS has and continues to force OEM PC vendors to choose between offering only MS on most systems, paying probably ten times what they are now per machine to only offer it on some, or offering it on none, and you get a recipe for a market as far away from 'free and open competition' as is possible.
demanding that the government reduce purchases from the software giant by 25 percent this year..... said however that the resolution may not be binding because it runs against fair trade regulations in Taiwan.
Rather than dictate a reduction which may trigger a legal mess, why not create an "encuragement" program, such as returning into a department's budget the cost savings from altneratives. Thus, if an office uses MySQL instead of MS-SQL, then let them keep the money that would go for MS-SQL rather than remove it from their budget?
It is difficult to get away from MS-Office because of document compatibility issues. However, server-oriented stuff such as Outlook, IIS, and MS-SQL are fairly easy to replace by dissallowing new setups for new sites and requiring existing MS sites to write most new software for the OSS product (after training).
Table-ized A.I.