Slashdot Mirror


27 Unknown Species Discovered

NaijaGuy writes "27 unknown species of spiders, centipedes, scorpion-like creatures and other animals have been discovered in caves beneath national parks in California's Sierra Nevada. The Texas-based Zara Environmental led the 3-year exploration and has published reports with photos of the fascinating critters. "Not only are these animals new to science, but they're adapted to very specific environments -- some of them, to a single room in one cave," said Joel Despain, a cave specialist who helped explore 30 of the 238 known caves in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks."

40 comments

  1. Yikes! by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1
    "There was also a daddy long legs with jaws bigger than its body..."

    *RUNS* Aren't those deadly, but only aren't because their fangs are too small to pierece the skin?

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:Yikes! by Crunchie+Frog · · Score: 2, Informative
      Aren't those deadly, but only aren't because their fangs are too small to pierece the skin?

      Nope just another urban legend

      --
      --- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
    2. Re:Yikes! by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      As pointed out, another urban legend. But this doesn't make it any less scary. I hate spiders! grrrrrrr :)

    3. Re:Yikes! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Foo: Aren't those deadly, but only aren't because their fangs are too small to pierece the skin?

      Bar: Nope just another urban legend

      Thanks for the link. I live in Daddy Longlegs country and have played with them since I was a kid, but never heard anything like this until my teenage daughter's boyfriend "informed" me of the "fact" within the past year. Unfortunately, simply showing him the evidence probably won't do anything to sway his views. Remember, folks: Hire a teenager, while they still know everything!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    4. Re:Yikes! by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      They tested it on Mythbusters. Adam put his arm in a jar full of them until one bit. He didn't die.

  2. Evidence or not? by Smoke2Joints · · Score: 1

    so, who would like to begin the debate as to if this gives evidence of evolution in action? (and likewise, who wants to be first to disagree?)

    1. Re:Evidence or not? by genrader · · Score: 1

      I see no evolutionary evidence here.

    2. Re:Evidence or not? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      It could be said that these animals have in the past ventured out of these single room worlds, and died because they were not equiped for life elsewhere. So, they only are found there.

      Or, it could be said that god designed these animals for this one room, so they are only found there. Since they would not evolve, in the god scenario, they could never live anywhere other than where god placed them.

      Either way, interesting to think about.

    3. Re:Evidence or not? by abigor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, about as interesting as wondering whether the Pink Rabbit of Estarcion placed all the ice crystals on the slopes of Mount Waddington by hand, or whether they formed as the result of well-established natural processes.

      In other words, for logical people, it's not interesting at all.

    4. Re:Evidence or not? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, I find your ideas intriguing, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    5. Re:Evidence or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Can't evolution be a tool of god? Wouldn't you create a logical system for creation and self changing beings if you could?

    6. Re:Evidence or not? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Personally, no. I agree God probably is a tool.

  3. Bah! by Mad_Rain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What, no Hobbits discovered? Well, perhaps they were eaten by those spiders. ;)

    --
    "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    1. Re:Bah! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      What, no Hobbits discovered? Well, perhaps they were eaten by those spiders. ;)

      Nah. Spiders don't eat hobbits. They've tried more than once, I might add, but they found out the hard way that hobbits have a nasty tendency to sting...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  4. *shudder* by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Too many spiders and scorpions... *shudder*

    Anyone know what the ecosystem in those caves (and in caves in general) feeds on? What's at the bottom of the food chain? (since there's no photosynthesis...)

    And no, I didn't have the patience to read TFA carefully, though I did look at all the pictures in the four reports... hence the *shudder* :p

    --
    ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    1. Re:*shudder* by aphoenix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Probably fungus is the snack of choice for those lingering near the bottom of the chain. There is flora that thrives in the dark - fungi tend to do so, but any non-photosynthetic flora that enjoys the damp could survive or even start to flourish.

    2. Re:*shudder* by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      Organic debris washed in with water, bat shit, leaves , etc.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:*shudder* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone know what the ecosystem in those caves (and in caves in general) feeds on? What's at the bottom of the food chain? (since there's no photosynthesis...)

      Check out this excellent documentary.

  5. Will slashdotters become a new species? by line-bundle · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they stay in their parents' basement? They have adapted to one room right?

    1. Re:Will slashdotters become a new species? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      going find a special scorpion-like creature that can only be found in one room of a deep, dark, creepy cave? sounds like a side-quest to me! i wonder if these guys got any rares at the end

    2. Re:Will slashdotters become a new species? by AndersOSU · · Score: 3, Funny

      They could, but reproduction is a requirement for evolution, and I don't see that happening.

  6. That's... by Eightyford · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's one intelligent designer!

  7. Intelligent Designer by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think the intelligent designer wanted us to find them now... I'm pretty sure these bugs are somehow supposed to body snatch Pat Robertson who will then become the next President by assinating any who oppose him. Donald Rumsfeld, who is also translucent w/ a yellow liver, will be his running mate. Upon hearing these plans of the intelligent designer, the flying spagetti monster was quoted "You win, I've got nothing." Its noody appendage was reported as "limp".

    --
    brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
  8. Absence of evidence by jfengel · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Interesting. It doesn't say that experiments say otherwise; it just says that the experiments haven't been done.

    So you have to make kind of a logical jump from there to saying that whoever is saying it doesn't have any proof, either. Which is almost certainly true, though it's a bit of a jump; conceivably it could be some sort of unpublished report. But as far as I know it's not based on anecdotal evidence, either; I've never heard of any small animals being bitten.

    Presumably nobody's done the study because they have no reason to believe that it is true. If somebody observed a daddy longlegs biting something larger than it and killing it, there would be reason to do the research. But if it killed a mouse, it would almost certainly cause at least some reaction in humans.

    That strikes me as an interesting glimpse into the difference between science and urban legend. The spiders could actually be poisonous, but from a scientific standpoint it wouldn't make the urban legend true regardless. That's because the legend appears to be based on no data, and without data it's not science even if it turns out to be factual.

    Huh.

    1. Re:Absence of evidence by mmontour · · Score: 1, Informative

      Interesting. It doesn't say that experiments say otherwise; it just says that the experiments haven't been done.

      They have been done, on Mythbusters. The venom didn't produce any significant effects.

    2. Re:Absence of evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That episode was GARBAGE!! They did NOT use "daddy longlegs" They used some kind of orb spider, not a DL.

  9. Probably varies. by jd · · Score: 5, Informative
    In New Zealand, you'll find caves filled with glow-worms, which feed on insects that fly in. In many caves with lake systems, you'll find sightless fish that feed off algae that comes in from the outside. Caves with geothermal heating may well have extremophile algae that live off the chemical soup. In general, life tends to be extremely creative in its methods of surviving and adapting.


    (Ice worms, another recently discovered species, can only survive in freezing or near-freezing conditions and live in glaciers. They crawl to the surface at night and feed off any organic matter that has settled on the ice. They were discovered in Washington State, I believe.)


    What shocks me is that many of the species that have been discovered in the past ten to fifteen years (the Wollemi Pine, for example, as well as the Ice Worms) have largely been in very well-explored, well-documented regions that may not be exactly on the beaten track, but have certainly been visited by knowledgable experts many times over many decades. In some cases, many centuries.


    Some of these discoveries (as in this case) have been through inadequate study. Other cases have been uncovered as a result of genetic studies proving physically similar organisms to actually be unrelated. (The converse has also happened.) Yet others have been through skeptisism obstructing observation. These things are all understandable and are inevitable. It's shocking only because virtually all environmental and developmental policy is based on what is known, and what is known is proving to be limited.


    We'll be discovering new species for a long time to come, but if we had more scientists doing basic field-work and/or DNA mapping, we'd find them a lot faster. The problem is, basic research isn't profitable (so corporations are generally uninterested) and isn't vote-winning (so politicians don't care). The sciences don't come cheap, but if nobody is going to cough up the cash, it will be left to pure chance on the encounter and blind luck on the necessary awareness. To me, that feels utterly wrong. Knowledge should be gained, not gambled.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Probably varies. by Swisssushi · · Score: 1

      You're definitely right. There's an old saying "What you find depends on what you're looking for." I think that even scientists are victims of their own predefined notions of what is possible and what is not.

      I think it's wonderful that people are constantly reminded that there is nothing is impossible.

      --
      Swisssushi - When the going gets tough, get some tenderizer
    2. Re:Probably varies. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      I don't think you'll find any biologist who would have told you the creatures found weren't possible. It's a matter of time and funding to find them, that's it.

  10. Worlds within worlds. by qualico · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "...they're adapted to very specific environments -- some of them, to a single room in one cave."

    If that is true, then there are far more discoveries on the way.

    Think about every orifice in the Earth.
    Has anyone calculated the possible surface area?

    Worlds within worlds.

    1. Re:Worlds within worlds. by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 1
      Think about every orifice in the Earth.

      I was eating, dude!
      --
      When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
    2. Re:Worlds within worlds. by qualico · · Score: 1

      lol, I forgot about goatse.

  11. 27 Unknown Species Discovered... by sdnoob · · Score: 0, Troll

    and twenty-six of those were found at the u.s. capitol building... the other was at some old white house on penn ave.

  12. Great. by Carpe+PM · · Score: 3, Funny

    I knew before I got up today that one of the things that would NOT make my day would be to read "WE FOUND MORE SPIDERS"!! The ones that I already knew about were plenty, thanks.

    1. Re:Great. by ELProphet · · Score: 1

      I'm re-sealing my basement now, thank you...

  13. And for our next scientific debate: by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    The Physics of Ice: Jack Frost theory vs. Crystallography.

    I mean, seriously, as if anyone thinks unguided physical processes can produce such intricate patterns?

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  14. A few thoughts by awarlaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Does the flash of the camera impair the creature?
    2. It seems that life can adapt to ANY non-vaccuum (maybe even there!)
    3. Maybe they evolved recently (within the last few decades). I am starting to think that Darwin's changes happen on an even faster scale than years. I am starting to think maybe changes can happen in a CURRENT generation.

    Just some thoughts

    -AL

    --
    TIME is the Aether...
  15. Pretty ordinary day then by SIGFPE · · Score: 1

    There are 10,000 new species discovered every year. Than means 10000/365 = 27+epsilon every day. So Slashdot is now reporting when news hasn't happened?

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  16. New spiders?!? by monsterX · · Score: 1

    I wonder what kind of Phat L00tz they drop.