New RIAA/MPAA "Customary Historic Use" Plan
Random_Transit writes "Ars Technica is reporting that the EFF has dug up plans by the RIAA/MPAA to stifle the consumer electronics market by replacing it's "fair use" policy with something called "Customary Historic Use". This new policy would effectively keep anyone from inventing any new type of media device without the RIAA/MPAA's say-so."
Automobile banned for violating historic customary use laws for the wheel.
If it's "new", it cannot be "customary historic". Thus, at least in the area of multimedia, this law will mean that from now on, no algorithms may be patented.
Either they have to admit that their algorithms are not "new", and they should not be patentable. Or they must admit that they are "new", and thus cannot be "customary historic". Now settle that among you, RIAA and patent sharks!
We should have a boston cd party
If we scrape together some money we can easily have this done. Republican Senator Gordon Smith, for example, the genius behind this fair use bill, can be bought for pretty cheap: Why should record companies get all the status quo preserving laws? If everyone in this thread were to donate $10 to a special PAC, we could probably get the "Nerd Employment Preservation Act of 2006" passed easily. And we could make extra money by taking short positions on the stocks of all our employers before Wall Street finds out about our new law.
> Maybe it's time for **AA to kick the bucket...
Sorry, but that's not a Customary Historic Use of buckets.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
I still have all my old wax cylinders. That damn punk Rudy Vallee - I showed him at last.
If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
Yeah... it also lets you build houses/hotels on your property.
Record companies banned for violating historic use law of piano rolls.
For more than a year in the historical period of 1999-2001, I customarily used the original implementation of Napster to download and share audio files. Therefore, Napster or any service that models itself along those lines is a customary historic use.
I'm fine with this. You go, Senator Smith!
Michael
"No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
Screw you, limey. We're the US - we tell you what your history is!
Humor police
You have made a bad pun. Go straight to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect $200.
Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
I don't think Tom Scholz would be very happy.
503 Sig Unavailable
The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
Just imagine if the buggy whip people had been this greedy, we'd either still be using horses to get around or we'd have the police checking to make sure we have license, registration, and buggy whip.
No, it's not very funny.
In fact, it's pretty stupid, but I'm posting it anyway.
Indeed. My grandfather set up 8MM video equipment to film Toscanini on TV, and shared it with all of his friends. My dad did the same thing to film the Beatles when they were on the Ed Sullivan show, and shared his copies freely. I myself have been copying and sharing content my whole life, from 8 Tracks through LPs and cassette tapes to videocassette tapes and then on to DVDs and CDs.
It seems like copying and sharing content IS ITSELF a "customary historic use." Heck, copying forms part of content - there really is no distinction at all between the two terms ("copying" versus "content"), for most of us. Only for the RIAA/MPAA and their paid for puppets.