Intel's New Architecture Too Late?
rts008 writes to tell us that TG Daily has an interesting interview with Randy Allen, AMD's vice president of the server products division, about (among other things) AMD's recent stellar fourth quarter numbers. From the article: "Responsible for that shrinking lead is especially AMD's server products group. Intel's CEO Paul Otellini recently acknowledged that Intel had to give up market shares to AMD and will likely be forced to hand over more shares until the next generation of server chips arrives. [...] AMD's Randy Allen explains in this conversation with TG Daily why he believes that Intel will need much more than a new processor to be able to slow AMD's growth."
AMD exec says AMD is better than its competitor. Earth shattering news!
Well it's a good thing that Apple is using Intel now otherwise they would really be in a hole.
-William Brendel
Considering Intel is dropping the "Intel Inside" logo as part of their rebranding, those PHB's better figure it out soon...
Last time I tried putting a cat in a bag, I ended up getting my face clawed.
I'm trying make this into an analogy. I can't. But cats and bags just dredges up bad memories.
Carry on.
Life is not for the lazy.
I never knew that having all the facts could be this simple! Thanks, Slashdot!
--S
-- sigs cause cancer.
Who said quantum computing was years away?
1. Put bag on floor with opening to the side.
2. Wait until curious cat goes into bag to investigate.
3. Profit.
It is pissing me off how long it is taking to get hand-optimised AMD64 routines for tight inner loops in various common algorithms.
Here, I wrote a highly-efficient 64-bit null loop for you in assembly:
: loop
JMP loop
It's an old analogy, coined when men were men, cats were cats, and bags were bags. In those days, a man would stuff fifty or even a hundred cats into bags before breakfast without even breaking a sweat, go and do a full day's hard manual work, and then stuff another load of cats into bags before supper.
I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.