Slashdot Mirror


Oboe Offers Portable Playlist

Chiggers writes to tell us that Mad Penguin has an interesting look at Oboe, the new music service from MP3Tunes. For a monthly fee Oboe allows you unlimited space to create a cross-platform music playlist available anywhere you have an internet connection via their AJAX-enabled GUI. The audio player still needs a little work but overall it is an interesting idea.

29 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. Two sides by Knight+Thrasher · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is an interesting idea. For those of us with nazi-port-blocking ISP's, who can't just open a secure server from home, this would be nice.

    However, I see mucho problemos in this sites future. In short, I'll summarize them all into 4 letters:

    RIAA.

    1. Re:Two sides by rwven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i'm not sure that's going to be a problem. There's nothing illegal about storing and accessing your own music online. (as long as only YOU can access it...) Honestly I would see the problem being the usage of their standard locker playlist idea of linking to other sites streams. A lot of sites rely on the ads that display in a special window while listening to their stream...and this does away with that. Uploading your own music to store and play from a third party site shouldn't be considered illegal. In theory it's no different than uploading them to your own password-protected site... If hosting was a little cheaper and your music collection smaller, it wouldnt be too hard to just write your own system that does this actually. Nifty...

    2. Re:Two sides by chris+macura · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure the RIAA is going to be such a big problem.

      http://www.radioblogclub.com/ for example offers alot of pop music for free: all you need is a browser with flash. There are advertisements, granted, but otherwise, there doesn't seem to be any catch.

      I'm not sure how they make money, and how they keep the *AA's happy, but they're doing it. So I don't think Oboe will have too much problems.

    3. Re:Two sides by Bruha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There was a big difference there. Mp3.com's system had made copies of the music already and when you loaded your cd it used those copies to add to your locker. Back then a lot of people were still on dialup or 128k connections at best.

      Today people are mostly above 384k for uploads and us lucky few that have bigger pipes can really take advantage of this. Since I made the copy it falls under fair use. No different if I ripped them all down to iso's and kept them on a accessable server that I paid for.

      All I'm doing is paying them for reliable space and transferr speed. In the end it's my music.

  2. tin hat on! by kalpol · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Create MP3 storage service

    2. Wait, rubbing hands and cackling evilly, for everyone to upload their pirated music.

    3. Show up at the door and demand to see the CDs the music came from...in fact, forget the CD, just sue.

    4. ???

    5. Profit!!

    --
    12:50 - press return.
  3. My.mp3.com? by jwilcox154 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't this similar to the service that mp3.com provided and got into trouble over? If I recall correctly, because mp3.com provided the same service, Vivendi-Universal got to buy them out at a discount price.

    1. Re:My.mp3.com? by dotpavan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      this mp3tunes.com is brought to you by the same people that were behind mp3.com

    2. Re:My.mp3.com? by Veldcath · · Score: 2, Informative

      The difference being that the previous services was you put in a number code from your physical CD and you get access to music THEY encoded and uploaded. This one YOU are uploading your music to their service

      The problem before, as argued in court, is that they did not have permission from the rightsholders to rip and distribute the music. This time, they've taken themselves out of the equation. They're simply a storage facility with tools for playing the music. If YOU upload something you don't own, that's your fault. With the previous system, you just needed to have the number from the CD, whether you'd bought it or not, and you could trick the system into thinking you owned it.

      --


      ... "I read part of it all the way through." -- Movie Mogul Sam Goldwyn (and some slashdot readers)
  4. grab an old machine and slap linux on it by aurelito · · Score: 5, Informative

    ampache can do this:
    http://www.ampache.org/

    kplaylist is a bit more lightweight (i use it):
    http://kplaylist.net/

    jinzora is a bloat beast, but a nice one at that:
    http://www.jinzora.org/

    1. Re:grab an old machine and slap linux on it by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ampache can do this
      kplaylist is a bit more lightweight
      jinzora is a bloat beast, but a nice one at that


      Not that "Oboe" is all that great a product name, but compared to the likes of these... yeesh.

    2. Re:grab an old machine and slap linux on it by Ambush+Commander · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...

      That's even worse! Whatever happened to Oboe, the instrument? And no, I was not being ironic, I seriously did not expect that. Idiots. PageRank wielding idiots. >:-(

  5. Filesize limitations by thaerin · · Score: 3, Funny

    20 MB audio file limit per song

    So I'm guessing that means I won't be able to take some extended Iron Butterfly tracks with me then?

    --
    If big boobed women work at Hooters do one legged women work at IHOP?
    1. Re:Filesize limitations by kzinti · · Score: 2, Funny

      20 MB audio file limit per song

      So I'm guessing that means I won't be able to take some extended Iron Butterfly tracks with me then?


      And just say "No" to Yes.

  6. online radio? by dotpavan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    how different is this from online radio? I could customize my station, pay a small charge (say for Yahoo music) and get to rent most of the artists! and I dont need to upload (imagine gigs of upload) anything nor worry about their servers.

    anything new here? except for that I might have to spend some time customizing my playlist on my radio, but it sure is shorter than uploading

    byw this Robertson (CEO/prez) is the same guy behind Linspire.

  7. MP3 webs by Life700MB · · Score: 4, Informative


    If you're into music playlists webs you really have to check Pandora, a great page that creates playlists based on genetic algorithms that relate an entire collection of songs to the one you describe as your favourite.

    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, ssh, $7.95

  8. I've got a cool idea for a portable music service by ptomblin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Create a small portable device with either a hard drive or flash storage, a battery, and maybe a screen that displays the song title, album name, artist name, and album art. That way people could bring their playlists anywhere, even if they are behind facist firewalls or even (gasp) away from a computer.

    Oh wait, I seem to have one right here. It's called "Photo iPod 60Gb". Come to think of it, I think my wife has one too - hers is called "iPod Mini 4Gb".

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  9. I already have one of these... by slashbob22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a great service for my music collection. It works on multiple hardware and software platforms. I can even use it in my car, without being tied to a network connection -- or monthly fee. That's right, I have a CD-RW drive. It's great! With RW discs I can burn new playlists anytime I would like. Mind you, I can't use the service anywhere, but I certainly couldn't use the online service at work either. I think these CDs are really going to take off soon. Yep, they are super fantastic. [/sarcasm]

    The idea is all fine and dandy, but I have serious issues with not being able to use my music or change playlist "offline". Even though we are in an always on society, sometimes its nice to be disconnected.

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  10. muse.net by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Informative

    does anyone here remember muse.net, the failed startup venture started by a bunch of the original winamp guys? it seems like this is a more expensive, less open version of that....

    I still wish it took off. would have been a very convenient service...

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  11. O Boes! by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this substantially better than Launchcast or Pandora?

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  12. Finally! by RandoX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nice to see the Oboe finally getting the respect it deserves!

  13. Several Problems with this by cualexander · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1.) 60 Gigs of Music would take a good while to upload at 32k/sec.
    2.) This assumes you always have internet connectivity.
    3.) Just seems like a huge pain really, and for what gain?
    4.) I can do the same thing right now if I wanted to with my broadband connection.
    5.) This is more convienent than my iPod how? Cheaper in the short run maybe, but not more convienent.

    Someone needs to explain the need for this. Maybe for a small segment of the population that has internet access and a computer attached to their hip 24/7 this would work. The review says he has problems carrying around an iPod, even an iPod nano, because he would forget it.

    Come on people. I don't see how this can possible last, or take off and the capital investment involved on the company's side as far as storage and bandwith costs doesn't seem at all to be covered by $40/year?? How does the company make a profit off that? That seems a bit ridiculous to me. I'd be leery of uploading my entire collection of music to a third party. Especially one of questionable staying power. So I spend hours and hours uploading my entire collection and then what happens when it all goes down?

    Just don't think this was well thought out.

    1. Re:Several Problems with this by Baricom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1.) 60 Gigs of Music would take a good while to upload at 32k/sec.
      No arguments there, except that not everybody has 60 gigs of music, particularly legal music (I only have about 10 ripped from CDs I own, and that more than meets my needs).

      2.) This assumes you always have internet connectivity.
      It assumes you always have Internet connectivity when you want to listen to your music. I'm near a computer surprisingly often throughout the day, and I always have access to broadband at those computers.

      3.) Just seems like a huge pain really, and for what gain?
      There's several gains. It's one less thing to carry around in your pockets. While it's more expensive in the long run, the start-up costs of getting an account are cheap ($3.33 per month for all the disk space you need, versus at least $20 per month to pay off an iPod). The music is presumably backed up more carefully than a typical user's music would be, and immune from being dropped and other problematic situations. I won't deny that there's downsides - just fewer than you might think.

      4.) I can do the same thing right now if I wanted to with my broadband connection.
      Yes, but not everybody else can. For example, I have broadband, but my upload speed isn't high enough to stream high-quality music. Even if it anybody could do this, there's always a market for individuals and companies that specialize in a particular service that you could technically do yourself, but at a higher opportunity cost. That's basic economics.

      5.) This is more convienent than my iPod how? Cheaper in the short run maybe, but not more convienent.
      It depends on your activities. This would be incredibly useful for me, and if I didn't suspect the RIAA might sue me merely for being a member (even if all the music I upload is completely legal and I physically own the media it's ripped from) I might actually look into it a little more.

  14. Time waste sorting music on iPod? by corvenus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the FA:
    Even though the iPod Nanos and other similar MP3 players are very small, it still is a bit of a bother to have yet one more device in my brief case.
    So, how the heck am i supposed to listen to my music on my way to work with this thing? Oh right, on my laptop with an antenna! Sure. Of course, i also want to take the time to upload 35Gb worth of music on some server i'm not even sure will still be there 1 year from now. Damn right... Honestly, except for being inexpensive, i can't any advantages to subscribing to thing service instead of having an MP3 player.
  15. The REAL story.... by Sierpinski · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know there's just going to be some guy sitting at the big 9-screen display at the company HQ watching as the hard drives fill up with music, shifting his hands in that manical way saying: "MINE! THEY'RE ALL MINE! ALL THE MUSIC I COULD EVER WANT!!! MINE!!!"

    He'll download all of it to his 500TB iPod Mega-edition and never listen to the same song twice in his life.

  16. This was done 5 years ago on myplay.com by szyzyg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well except without all the Ajax goodness - but myplay was fun while it lasted. They wanted to get in on the whole internet music scene but like everyone else they couldn't get licenses from the music business, so they let users store their music online and make it accessible wherever they went. The money ran out before the music industry started doing deals.

  17. Customary Historic Use by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since this is not customary historic use of music, it hasn't got a chance.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  18. DVD Jon worked on this by Psionicist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From DVD Jon:s blog http://nanocrew.net/2005/10/21/moved-to-san-diego/

    As you might have read, I've moved to San Diego. I've joined a great team at MP3tunes and will be applying my expertise to a project called Oboe. That's about all I can say at this point.

    On my way to San Diego I stopped by San Francisco. I met up with some of the people at the EFF and Seth Schoen demonstrated the research they've been doing into printers that spy on you. Unfortunately I did not have much time in San Francisco, but I did get to visit the Exploratorium.

    I will try to get back to everyone who has emailed me recently. If you haven't received a response by Monday, feel free to resend your email.


    Interesting.

  19. What makes Oboe unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    What makes Oboe unique is that you can store all of your music online and then access it from anywhere or sync it to multiple devices. There are 3 primary uses which make Oboe useful:

    1) Backup all your music. You've probably spent a lot of time digitizing your music collection and making playlists. Or maybe you've bought lots of music from iTunes store. You can very economically and easily back that up with a single mouse click using the Oboe Sync software for Mac/Win/Lin. I'm surprised to hear slashdot readers say "I wouldn't trust my music to online storage." Very funny! That's what people said about the first banks too. In actuality, your music is much safer in data centers around the world then in your house where it can get stolen, broken, etc. $39.95 for unlimited storage is a new model for music fans that makes a lot of sense.

    2) Keep your music in sync on multiple devices. If you listen to music on more than one computer, you can use Oboe Sync to keep the music on all your computers in sync. You'll have all your music and playlists on all your PCs with one click on Oboe Sync. If you add a CD to one computer it will ripple through your listening world. Today we offer sync clients for Mac/Win/Lin devices. Tomorrow we'll have sync clients for all devices. It's clear to me that people will have 20 devices they listen to music on in the future (car radio, sunglasses, phone, internet alarm clock, bike helmet, wifi-mp3 player, PDA, etc). You'll want a service to keep track of all your music and get it to all those devices. That's exactly where Oboe will shine.

    I fully expect people to not understand this now because they'll say "I'll just carry my ipod around everywhere." I believe all your data will live online and you won't have to carry it everywhere. You also won't have to plug it into a PC to get music on it. It will just get the music directly from the net. You'll see new devices start to get this functionality shortly. And if you want to see a list of current locker sizes check out http://www.lockerenvy.com/ Here you'll find the biggest lockers and Sideload users.

    3) Listen from any web device. Oboe has a nifty web interface so you can go to any computer in the world and play your music and playlists via streaming.

    The concept is similar to my.mp3, but the music loading is very different. All music loaded into personal Oboe lockers are at the request of the user and not from a master database at MP3tunes. There's also a free account you can sign up for. You can't sync your music, but you can Sideload tracks and use web interface.

    -- MR

    CEO of MP3tunes.com

  20. Nothing new by danpsmith · · Score: 3, Informative

    Services like these have been around for a long time. In fact, so long that I was dissatisfied with the few existing services and decided to try my own hand at something similar for my senior seminar project.


    I'm quite sure that this service is more complicated and sophisticated and things, but I needed a simple solution for listening to music from my home PC while I was commuting to school with my laptop. I looked at existing solutions but they seemed to either be too sophisticated, not work, or cost more than I was willing to pay for such a service.


    I always thought it was a tad bit redundant to host another whole collection of MP3s when all I really wanted was to listen to my own music while away from the computer. I didn't need a lot of bandwidth to pull this off, because it was only me listening.


    My solution was a program I wrote that is basically a HTTP server modified to send playlist files containing the URLs of music, and will also zip up files if you have to get a whole album during a visit somewhere.


    I know that most broadband has not enough upload speed for a real server, but if you are just serving yourself your own files and you don't mind leaving your computer on, why not just do it that way? I noticed that the 30k/sec I get in upload speed is more than enough to stream most MP3 files without a hitch. You definitely don't need a dedicated service to accomplish these goals.

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.