Slashdot Mirror


The Vomit Worth Millions?

ozmanjusri writes "ABC is reporting that a family in Australia recently found a large lump of ambergris, which they believe may be worth millions. It is a fascinating material, created by a sperm whale's intestine in response to irritation, probably caused by the undigested beaks of squid. The waxy mass is coughed out by the whale during a belch which is reported to be audible kilometers away, and is a putrid stinking mass. Floating in salt water and exposure to sunlight for ten years or more matures the waxy blob into a grey, sweet smelling solid which is used as a base for perfumes. Although the family may be able to sell the ambergris, it cannot be used in Australia or the US, since both countries are signatories to the Washington Treaty, which bans the trade of musk deer and whale products for perfume."

101 comments

  1. Yuck... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When you thought that a cat's hairball was bad enough...

  2. Tyler Durden... by MachDelta · · Score: 1

    ...eat your heart out.

  3. She certainly looks pleased by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always wondered what the "Woohoo, I'm rich" and "OMG, I'm sitting next to a big lump of vomit" expressions would look like combined.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  4. 'Precious hamburgers?' by spiny · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll simply shed my skin!

    --

    Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
    Leela: No he didn't.
    1. Re:'Precious hamburgers?' by n0dalus · · Score: 1

      Well you asked the right guy; I'm the whale biologist. Though personally I hate whales. Especially Mushu.

  5. Not quite millions by GroeFaZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But still not bad for a random walk on the beach. An article I read states that the material is worth around 17 Euro/gramm. The lump was around 15 Kg, which made the couple a smooth 240.000 Euros.

    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    1. Re:Not quite millions by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Funny

      But thats millions in $AU.

      /me ducks.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    2. Re:Not quite millions by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      And imagine if they moved to Canada, they could be billinares!

    3. Re:Not quite millions by heinousjay · · Score: 0, Troll

      Then they could afford to hire someone to teach them to spell!

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    4. Re:Not quite millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      15 * 1000 * 17 = 240?

      Shouldn't it be 255,000 Euros?

      Anyways, the article quotes an initial estimate just based off the raw material of $20 a gram but goes into how the demand (since that piece could keep a manufacturer producing for 20 years) could easy spike up the price.

    5. Re:Not quite millions by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      The draw back of course being they'd become Canadians.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:Not quite millions by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      It's the damn metric system.......

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  6. Futurama by ASayre8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't Futurama already cover this in one of it's episodes?

    1. Re:Futurama by andrewjhall · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oblig. Quote: [Amy daubs herself in fresh ambergris] Mom: Who smells of freakin' porpoise hawk? Amy: I do!

    2. Re:Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precious... hamburgers?

    3. Re:Futurama by spyrochaete · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You're covered in precious ambergris!"

      "Precious hamburgers?"

  7. Can't be sold by cheesee · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ambergris is classified as a product of a whale under Australian law, so the family is unable to sell it commercially. It can be sold for research purposes but it requires permits for export. The most they can do with it in Australia is donate it to a museum or use it as centerpiece for their dining room table.

    --
    Got Shadowrun? Awakened Worlds
    1. Re:Can't be sold by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      Smuggling.

      It's not hard. Slap the crap in a crate and mail it to the buyer. Just don't TELL anyone first.

      I think that these folks probably lost what could have been a fairly lucrative and harmless black market adventure.

    2. Re:Can't be sold by un.sined · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear Sir or Madam,
      I am writing to you with a business opportunity. We have a large chunk of whale vomit that one of our deceased investors was keeping. As we've spent several months attempting to locate a next of kin... etc, etc, etc.

  8. Unfortunately... by madaxe42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's actually more often than not illegal to posess it - as it's a product of an endangered species - if they don't burn it, and soon, they could find themselves doing jail time.

    1. Re:Unfortunately... by kimba · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. Except for the fact Australia is generally one of the countries where police use their discretion to let common sense prevail, rather than haul people away for breaching the letter of the law.

    2. Re:Unfortunately... by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      True, but they'll still have difficulties if they try to sell it - trafficking of whale products isn't taken kindly to - if they do want to sell it they're best off contacting Givaudan-Delawanna, Incorporated and Van Amerigen-Haebler, both of New York City.

    3. Re:Unfortunately... by Feanturi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not arguing with you, but rather the lawmakers that would have it so: It's stupid because it's a waste product from the whale, that has to float around in the ocean for a decade before becoming what it is. I can't see how the interest in such a product is of any harm to whales, it's not something you need to kill them for.

    4. Re:Unfortunately... by Patik · · Score: 0, Troll
      Except for the fact Australia is generally one of the countries where police use their discretion to let common sense prevail, rather than haul people away for breaching the letter of the law.
      You're right. Other countries haul people away for breaching the letter of the law, then dump them in Australia.
    5. Re:Unfortunately... by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      Or America, or pretty much any country The british empire started colonising and couldn't generate enough immigrant labour to get things moving.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    6. Re:Unfortunately... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you have to understand the fun side of this stuff: it's something that you can kill whales for. Take a whale, rip it open, pull out whale vomit, float vomit in sun exposed salt water tank for 10 years, sell for massive profit. Fun!

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    7. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeh because we kill cows before we rip them open and take out the milk, so much more profitable than just milking them

    8. Re:Unfortunately... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Well, if you have a cheap, safe way to induce whale vomitting, let's hear about it.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:Unfortunately... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      It's actually more often than not illegal to posess it - as it's a product of an endangered species - if they don't burn it, and soon, they could find themselves doing jail time.

      Yeah, but it's not as if anyone went anywhere near a whale to get it.

      It just seems so odd -- a whale horks up a loogie in the ocean, it floats around and changes into something else. It then washes up on a beach and someone picks it up.

      To be violating a law just seems wierd in that case. Imagine, if, hypothetically, a panda took a dump on my front lawn. Could I be comitting a crime for having a 'product of an endangered species'? (Assuming of course panda-poo has any redeeming qualities that I'd want to hang onto it for =)

      We are, after all, talking about what vomit here.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Unfortunately... by Engdy · · Score: 1

      If it became legal to sell the vomit, then perhaps people would start to farm the vomit, resulting in harm to the whales (holding whales in captivity, seeding ambergris through unhealthy diet, inducing vomit in unhealthy ways).

      I suppose you could open up a loophole, allowing for sale of naturally occurring vomit, but that would still provide a motive for "encouraging" naturally occurring vomit (through the surreptitious methods listed above).

      Man, I loved typing "vomit" so many times!

      --
      Siggy Wiggy Figgy Tiggy a bana bo Biggy!
    11. Re:Unfortunately... by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Well, I am sure this glass of pure mountain spring water, has a super tiny bit of ex-whale piss, and being in the US, can Evian ( wich coencidently is Naive backwards) be taken to court for selling a whale byproduct? I am sure this chunk of whatever is only a small part of what the whale originaly hurled.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  9. If they were British... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...I believe they'd have to give it to the Queen. Whales and their, err, byproducts, are subject to Crown privilege, as are a number of other animals and fish. It's a handy way to prevent trade in endangered species, even though it originates from making sure that the Crown is always richer than everyone else, because fortunately enough, what was considered rare enough to put under it originally are species which are threatened today.

    1. Re:If they were British... by madaxe42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Almost true. Actually, all whales in the dominion are the property of the queen, and if there is one, the king - the tail of the whale is the queen's property (for her whalebone corsets) and the rest is the king's - for the meat and blubber.

      In 1970 the queen voluntarily repealed her right to this law, however lords refused to pass the motion, so the queen does still own all whales.

      That said, the natural history museum has first dibs on any marine animals to wash up on british coastline.

  10. mmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Brian: Ambergris by Odion. It's made with real bits of whale vomit so you know it's good. This stuff is illegal in 9 countries.
    Ron: Yes, it's quite pungent, it stings the nostrils... in a good way though. Brian, I'm gonna be honest with you: that stuff smells like pure gasoline.
    Brian: They've done studies you know, they say 60% of the time, it works every time.
    Ron: That doesn't make any sense.

    1. Re:mmmm by kevin.fowler · · Score: 1

      So it smells like Bigfoot's dick?

      --
      Bury me in mashed potatoes.
    2. Re:mmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've done studies you know, they say 60% of the time, it works every time.

      One of the best lines ever.

  11. Ugh by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Funny

    I should know better than to read /. during breakfast.

    Excuse me...

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:Ugh by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Keep a careful track of that breakfast you just regurgitated. Float it around in the ocean for 10 years, and someone may pay big money for it.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  12. Loophole by spineboy · · Score: 1

    I guess they could sell it to a foreign middle man for "research" purposes, whereas then he would sell it to a perfume company.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  13. Actually when processed it smells lovely. *grin* by Magdalene · · Score: 0

    And as it comes from a *living* whale now it should be classed as a *kosher* product by most countries that ban whaling the only problem being that japan and norway still kill many whales for so called sientific research so untill that is stopped completely you have to be really careful of your sources, much the same way that 'dolphin safe' tuna has to be 'dolphin safe'. I have a company in Italy willing to export raw beach gotten ambergris @ about 68 Euros an ounce so I'm lucky, as it is one of the only perfume oils that, once processed will work on my skin type.

    (most others burn off on the exoskeleton..something to do with having that concentrated hydrochloric acid for blood)
    -friendly nieghbourhood alien maggy. *GRIN*

    --
    -Magdalene --"there are 10 types of people in the world, those who read binary, and those who don't"
  14. Sick sad world by seizium · · Score: 1

    Family finds whale puke on beach. Wait until they try to sell it for millions.
    Next, on Sick sad world ... (no-one will get this)

    1. Re:Sick sad world by GeekDork · · Score: 1

      So get down on your knees and begin to pray that the town blows awaaaaay!

      --

      Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

    2. Re:Sick sad world by JordanL · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh.... Daria... that was a funny show....

  15. Re:Sick sad world (off topic) by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 2, Funny
    Quoth sezium
    Family finds whale puke on beach. Wait until they try to sell it for millions. Next, on Sick sad world ... (no-one will get this)
    Yay for Daria!
  16. Can't they just eBay it? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The law in this case does seem to be a bit of an ass. Selling ambergris doesn't hurt the whale any more than it hurt Shatner to sell his kidney stone (although presumably it was a little unpleasant for him at the time said stone actually came out, ouch).

    You can't catch and kill a whale to extract ambergris, because the stuff has to weather naturally for years, so it should be obvious it was just a lucky find.

    Incidentally, the captcha for making this post was "inerited". WTF?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Can't they just eBay it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Get yer self a Grays. The tube from the kidney to the bladder is the Ureter and, I've read, about the size of a pencil lead. You're thinking of the Urethra, which is quite a bit bigger, although I'm sure it wasn't pleasant there either. I've known a grown man doubled up on the floor of a car while the pressure of urine backing up in his kidney pushed a stone through the ureter to his bladder. Yikes. I get the attempted joke here but jeez, this is your body, you ought to know a little something about it. Perhaps you're thinking of bladder stones, but I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader.

  17. Re:Sick sad world (off topic) by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    I once went out with a girl just like Daria, right down to the hair, the short skirt, the boots and the bad attitude. I still find the cartoon spooky to watch.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  18. Prince of Whales... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Surely it would be the property of her son Charles.

  19. Where's the marine biologist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You heard Roseanne!

  20. Contradicts Moby Dick! by 4181 · · Score: 4, Informative
    The article states: If you were to take it ... immediately after the whale has expelled it, then you would put it back in the water, because apparently the smell is horrific.

    But in chapter 91 of Moby Dick, The Pequod Meets The Rose-Bud, Stubb fast talks a French whaler out of a dead bloated whale, and then harvests a purse of ambergris directly from its bowels.

    --
    Stubb to the French Captain via a symapthetic interpreter: Thank him heartily; but tell him it's against my principles to drink with the man I've diddled.

    1. Re:Contradicts Moby Dick! by Wonko42 · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking the same thing. Ambergris was one of the most profitable parts of whaling back in those days, and they didn't just find it sitting on beaches or floating in the ocean; they harvested it from the whales themselves. Someone has their information wrong, and I'd be surprised if it were Melville.

    2. Re:Contradicts Moby Dick! by Castar · · Score: 1

      Melville does have an entire chapter where he talks about whales as giant fish instead of mammals, you know. So he certainly can be wrong when discussing whales. However, I agree that it's unlikely he'd be wrong about the harvesting aspects, since those were well understood at the time.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
  21. Subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This has been Roseanne, your guide to the world of facts."

  22. RTFA by Potor · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I don't think their target is fellow Australians. According to tfa, the last one found was sold abroad:
    "I do know that the most recent find in Queensland ... attracted a gentleman from Indonesia who bought it ... so who knows?"
  23. What exactly... by Eivind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What exactly is the sense of forbidding trade in a product with whale-origin that in no way influences the whale if used ? I mean, it's literally ten year old vomit from the whales POV. It's not like any whale will in any way be negatively influenced by the harvesting (i.e. picking up from beach) and selling of this item.

    1. Re:What exactly... by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
      It's not like any whale will in any way be negatively influenced by the harvesting (i.e. picking up from beach) and selling of this item.

      well, not everyone waits until the whale vomits... probably because you can make money off of unpuked whale stuff, too.

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    2. Re:What exactly... by Surt · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I posted elsewhere:
      http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=175059 &cid=14557197

      The danger is that if this stuff was commercially viable, you could go out, kill a dozen whales, find the one that had some vomit in its stomach, stick that vomit in a saltwater tank for ten years, and sell the result.

      In some ways, it's a lot like forbidding the sale of elephant ivory: after all, you can collect the tusks of dead elephants from the secret elephant burial grounds with no harm to the elephant population, right?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:What exactly... by GroeFaZ · · Score: 1

      For the same reason African states don't trade in elephant ivory they seized from poachers, or Western states don't trade in illegal drugs: The trade with it such items is forbidden, and any contract involving a forbidden trade is void.

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    4. Re:What exactly... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      What exactly is the sense of forbidding trade in a product with whale-origin that in no way influences the whale if used?

      To prevent dishonest people from going whaling, killing the animal, scumming its intestine, then going back to port and claiming to have found it washed up on an island beach. Though this is a particularly extreme example due to the cost of the material, in general it's best to set up preventative laws like these to prevent bad people from having a financial incentive to do bad things. It's the same reason we dole out pollution limits on industries that don't have pollution issues (even a web developer technically has legal limits on how much they're allowed to dump in the river, doncha know. Please, no replies about the cost of the grid; I know, and that's not the point.)

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    5. Re:What exactly... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      For the same reason African states don't trade in elephant ivory they seized from poachers, or Western states don't trade in illegal drugs: The trade with it such items is forbidden, and any contract involving a forbidden trade is void.

      It's forbidden because it's forbidden? Nice solid argument, there.

    6. Re:What exactly... by GroeFaZ · · Score: 1

      Well, I think the reason for why the trade is initially forbidden should be clear, so I didn't mention it (and by the way, you also subtly changed the subject from outlawing exceptions to outlawing the trade at all): to outlaw the market for resources that are for the most part won by decimating an endangered species. However, if you allow exceptions to this law, like, say, selling ivory that was seized, then it would have several negative effects: First of all, to even allow this exception, the law has to be written accordingly. It will get more complicated, will leave room for abuse ("look, I found this bloody ivory tusk in the savanna, wanna buy?"), and to keep the abuse of the exception rule in check, additional enforcement (inspectors, paperwork, etc.) is required, which will cost more than simply outlawing every trade. Secondly, if the government allows such trade or even participates actively in it, this will have negative impact in terms of prevention. Protecting the whales is also about showing you're serious about it.

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    7. Re:What exactly... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, making things illegial creates a black market in which the value of said item increases greatly. This makes the incentive to collect much higher and the probablilty that most if not all of this stuff is harvested from killed whales.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:What exactly... by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      The difference being, of course, that you can't get ambergris by harming whales, and you can't get ivory without harming elephants, so the comparison, and thus any law prohibiting the sale of ambergris, is silly.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    9. Re:What exactly... by GroeFaZ · · Score: 1

      You can't obtain ambergris by catching a whale and ripping him open? It's the only way, if you rule out extremely rare chance finds like the one in the article.

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    10. Re:What exactly... by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      You can't obtain good ambergris that way, and given how rare it is to find a whale with any sort of ambergris, it really isn't an economical poaching opportunity. You would do better with a single top-quality tuna than a usual chunk of ambergris. Good quality ambergris gets as much as $20,000/kilo at retail, but the stuff fresh out of a whale's belly takes years to get to that quality.

      http://www.netstrider.com/documents/ambergris/book s/index.html#I.4
      The Soviet Juggernaut, p. 417.
              Only 3-4% of all sperm whales killed by the Soviet whaling fleet were found to contain ambergris.

      Given any kind of value to the rest of the whale, ambergris would be a very small part of a whaler's expected profit. Given that whaling on large enough a scale to expect to get any ambergris is too obvious to pass unnoticed, and the expenses of such a ship too high to be financed by ambergris alone, requiring the sale of meat to make ends meet, thus making detection even more likely, the odds of any current ambergris being from whale hunting are just about zilch. Washed-up ambergris is pretty easy to tell from the fresh sort, anyway, so the rule is quintessential bureaucratic nonsense. I wouldn't be surprised if the whole idea came from the makers of the synthetic replacement for genuine whale-puke.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    11. Re:What exactly... by Eivind · · Score: 1
      to outlaw the market for resources that are for the most part won by decimating an endangered species.

      Fine. If that was the case, I'd agree full-heartedly. But the thing is Ambra is *NOT* for the most part won by "decimating an endangered species", infact I don't know that it's even *POSSIBLE* to win ambra by hunting whales, because there's no way to know which whales would have the precursor of ambra in its intestine, and even if you knew which one, extracting it and working it to ambra would very likely not be a paying proposition.

      (by the way, the minke-whales that *are* hunted today are by no mean an "endangered" species. Infact there's literally a million of them, way *MORE* than before the start of comercial whaling, even Greenpeace acknowledges this)

  24. That's funny because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    scientists believe only about one per cent of sperm whales release ambergris.

    Scientists believe only about one percent of Slashdotters release sperm!

    1. Re:That's funny because... by noc007 · · Score: 1

      About 2/3rds of all statistics are made up on the spot.

      :p

    2. Re:That's funny because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      99 million empty kleenex boxes say you're wrong.

  25. Recording of a whale horking? by CptNerd · · Score: 4, Funny


    Man, it would be great to add a recording of whale hork to one of those insipid 80's "Songs of the Whale" collections...

    "And now we will record the haunting sounds of these gentle***HOOOOOOOORRRRRKKKK***Splat*** Dear God in Heaven, what was *that*?"

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    1. Re:Recording of a whale horking? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Almost had the Coke I was drinking spraying all over the keyboard.

      Where are my Goddam mod points now...

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    2. Re:Recording of a whale horking? by pelrun · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      Oh god, I'm gonna be hearing HOOOOOOOOOORRRRKK in my head for ages now...

    3. Re:Recording of a whale horking? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      My roommate just asked me if I was okay I was laughing so hard. Then she called me a dork.

    4. Re:Recording of a whale horking? by CptNerd · · Score: 1


      Then my job here is done!

      Thanks for the comments everyone, it's both comforting and disturbing that others share my twisted sense of humor!

      ^___^

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  26. Re:Chances of survival by Zygamorph · · Score: 1
    If anything, allowing this type of trade would improve the chances of whale survival in that you need whales around to keep producing the fresh stuff so that ten years latter you have the "good" stuff. I wonder if there is a way to quickly age it properly?

    I heard a story about aligators in Florida being an endangered species. Then someone realized that people paid big bucks for aligator leather goods and started farming them. There are now a lot of aligators in Florida.

    It sounds much like mankind's history. First we "harvested" from the wilds, then we invented agriculture and really harvested. Being good to eat is just a plant's method of increasing the chance's of making more plants.

  27. For more amusement... by NoseBag · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...Read "Perfume" by Patrick Suskind for more information on disgusting substances used in the perfume industry. Its also a hell of a good story.

    If you think whale barf is bad, check out civet.

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
    1. Re:For more amusement... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

      Worse, people pay top dollar for coffee beans that have been up a civet's butt. In fact, think Slashdot had an article on that not too long ago...

    2. Re:For more amusement... by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      "If you think whale barf is bad, check out civet."

      Nothing says "class" like anal gland extract.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  28. That should be in the Finding Nemo sequel by Jim+in+Buffalo · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Pixar ever does a Finding Nemo sequel, they've just got to have a whale belching up a stinking pile of squid beaks. The kids would love that.

    --
    This sig, aah-ah, is comin' like a ghost-sig...
    1. Re:That should be in the Finding Nemo sequel by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Haha...Now thatDisney owns Pixar, a sequel is assured - direct to video crap.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  29. Ebay by ChristianNerds.com · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Heh. Yeah, when I first saw the title, I thought someone was trying to sell their kid's vomit on ebay or something.

    --
    http://www.christiannerds.com/, TRUTH and Technology
  30. Already purchased few years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... and it evolved into management at my last job. Alas, now I know where they came from! Thanks, slashdot!

  31. I, for one... by perbert · · Score: 1

    would not want my picture---my one chance at fame---to be the one where I am posing on a beach next to a glob of whale vomit.

  32. Roseanne's Definition by slashbob22 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Roseanne "Ambergris. Noun. A grease-like product of the sperm whale's digestive tract that is used as a base in the finest perfumes. This has been Roseanne, your guide to the world of facts." - Thanks Futurama

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  33. Spice by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


    Does this remind anyone else of the Spice of Arrakis? Large animal, poisonous excretion from it's guts, which metamorph into something valuable. Interesting.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  34. All your whales... by camusflage · · Score: 1

    so the queen does still own all whales.

    Whales. Whales. All your whales are belong to us.

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  35. Re:Chances of survival by nickname225 · · Score: 1

    That's some strange logic you have working there - better to be farmed and killed for leather goods than to just gently go extinct. Try applying that same reasoning to humans and see how it sounds. Given the choice between death for my species or life as livestock - I would chose death.

  36. In other news... by DrYak · · Score: 4, Funny
    if you have a cheap, safe way to induce whale vomitting

    Flash news, hard liquor sales go up. An interviewed buyer told our report : "It's for the whales".
    In related news, police has received several complaints about loud drunken whales vomiting near harbors : "As if the drunken sailors weren't enough" complained a senior citizen...

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  37. Can't... Resist... Obligatory... Quote... by redthefed · · Score: 1

    Biologist: I don't want your watch! You're covered in precious ambergris! Kif: Precious Hamburgers?

  38. Ah Yes... by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...in the multi-billion year quest to attract mates, practices such as bathing in putrid whale vomit are just as common today as wearing stoat carcass on one's head once was. Yep. We've progressed alright. ;p

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Ah Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cor mate! They was good smelling stoat carcasses, they was!!

  39. DVDs? by orclevegam · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if they sell a DVD box set of Daria anywhere?

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    1. Re:DVDs? by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      On doing further research I found the answer (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daria).
      I think from now on, before I ask a question anywhere I'll go check out wikipedia first.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  40. Re:Sick sad world (off topic) by Ykant · · Score: 1

    Yes, but did she put out?

    --
    Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
  41. Daria rules! by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    We get it.

    All is not lost.

    and rememeber that there is no facet about life which cannot be improved with pizza.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  42. Re:Chances of survival by akintayo · · Score: 1

    Or it could lead to unrestraining harvesting an extinction of the animal. As is the case with cod and the UK fishing industry.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/842087.stm

    --
    Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
  43. YES! Best... idea... EVAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, I read this at work, and could barely keep from laughing loud enough to disrupt those around me. That was awesome.

    Now, I'll be forever waiting for that CD to come out. I'd SO buy it, purely for it's weird value :P

  44. Waxy surfaces reduces parisites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whales use this wax to prevent barnicals from attaching.barnicals use van derwalls force to attach themselves .This wax is excreated through poors on the whales body to prevent parasites from attaching.A geiko would not stick to this wax.nor would a zebra mussel.lg

  45. No concept of history, even among the trekkies... by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    Jeez you guys! What a bunch of ignoramuses! Don't ANY of you know about the whaling industry or history or maybe read Moby Dick in school? Gods....

    The whole reason whales have been hunted was to rip stuff out of 'em, one of the ingredients being ambergris. And yeah, there are still factory ships out there with exploding harpoons, just waiting to be put back into commission. While modern technology has replaced whale oil, whalebone corset stays, and most of the scrimshaw industry, there are still plenty of people who would love to go hunting whales to sell the meat to the japanese.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  46. Animal husbandry by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    It's funny how people get this idea that since we can farm land-dwelling animals (cows, alligators, crocodiles, swinge) that we can also do the exact same thing with animals that dwell in the oceans (whales, blue fin tuna). Come ON, boys! Get your head out. The environments are comletely different, as are the animals in question.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon