Court Rules Burning Porn = Making Porn
An anonymous reader writes "An appeals court has upheld the prosecution of a Michigan man who was charged with production of child pornography after downloading and burning pornographic pictures from the Internet. The pictures were created by a Russian website that the man was not affiliated with in any form. From the court decision (PDF): 'After reviewing the dictionary definition of
the word make, the circuit court stated that the bottom line was that, following the mechanical
and technical act of burning images onto the CD-Rs, something new was created or made that
did not previously exist.' Is this simply a court's overreaction to a scumbag pedophile? And how does this affect the lawsuits by the BSA, RIAA, and MPAA?"
first post
HELLO WORLD
29340 29340
HELLO WORLD
68237 68237 82887 82887 56340 56340 77580 77580 59764 59764
64682 64682 82453 82453 90987 90987 52935 52935 99912 99912
96240 96240 82004 82004 62894 62894 86390 86390 44134 44134
34808 34808 82877 82877 78726 78726 71759 71759 51622 51622
55085 55085 03499 03499 91712 91712 46333 46333 09881 09881
41491 41491 06748 06748 71246 71246 88540 88540 78693 78693
47794 47794 55385 55385 83789 83789 21747 21747 09483 09483
60690 60690 16427 16427 57700 57700 45560 45560 92374 92374
95863 95863 92780 92780 86644 86644 67243 67243 84634 84634
07740 07740 43286 43286 44998 44998 53637 53637 42527 42527
03709 03709 03489 03489 71165 71165 39897 39897 38045 38045
37942 37942 43607 43607 47342 47342 07263 07263 00004 00004
17922 17922 15131 15131 17883 17883 37487 37487 26031 26031
43516 43516 47427 47427 60613 60613 13157 13157 56894 56894
51369 51369 25099 25099 18797 18797 16278 16278
K-BYE
Is the incidence of AIDS lower or are they just not testing for it so much? It started as a result of drug use, but now it seems to be spreading through sex.
4 86.stm
. asp?ArchiveNews=Yes&NewsCode=27489&NewsKind=Cultur e
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1043
http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default