Slashdot Mirror


Loss of Applied IQ Among UK Youth?

Baldrson writes "The UK Times Online reports that: 'After studying 25,000 children across both state and private schools Philip Adey, a professor of education at King's College London confidently declares: "The intelligence of 11-year-olds has fallen by three years' worth in the past two decades."' 3 years loss at age 11 is an IQ of 100*8/11 or 73 -- a massive loss of 27 points. Although the test measures, not general IQ per se, but general IQ applied to scientific and technical reasoning, it nevertheless appears to blow 'a gaping hole' in what has been called The Flynn Effect: that IQs have been rising in most parts of the world -- particularly the developed countries."

14 of 594 comments (clear)

  1. Only a drop of 27 points? by payndz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What with Celebrity Big Brother, the Crazy Frog and chav culture, I'm amazed it's that few!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:Only a drop of 27 points? by igb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What was that about primary school homework? My wife and I recall there being no homework while we were at primary school (1969 onwards) while our children appear to receive quite a lot. ian

  2. Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We're not stupid... We're advanced.

    That obselete test just fails to keep up with modern applications of science and math. Like manipulating them to support your point, or redefining them for political reasons.

  3. Rise of technology... by TriezGamer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The internet is a vast information resource available to a large portion of the civilized world, but I don't think kids today are interested in learning anything. As parents (and people in general, I think) have become more selfish as time goes by, this is the only behavior our children see, leading them to behavior that isn't interested in learning. All they really want is to be entertained. In this regard, the electronic age might be our worst enemy. Instead of using computers and the internet as a tool to expand thier world, they use them as a crutch -- for entertainment when needed, and to do the thinking for them when presented with things like math problems, spelling and grammar. If being smart is no longer 'cool', what's the incentive to learning anything? Money in the form of 'future income' is not enough of an incentive for many kids -- Future income means future work, and many of these kids will settle for a job at a fast food restaurant (despite those jobs being incredibly stressful and low-wage) because they don't want to put forth the effort to learn anything and/or find another job.

  4. Re:Flynn (whover he is) is an idiot by CyricZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't mistake a "drop" in IQ with rising IQs elsewhere.

    Recall that places like India and China have, for various reasons, not been the best places to foster intellect in recent times (the last two or three hundred years). The people there are just as intellectually capable as anyone from a Western nation, but did not have many of the advantages that Western society was able to offer due to its better economic position, and so forth.

    But times have changed, and education is far more available in places like India and China, in addition to many other developing countries. So it's no wonder that the comparative IQ gap between Western and Eastern cultures is closing, and closing quickly. It's not because people in the Western world are becoming stupider; it's because the people in the East are now able to take advantage of better educational opportunities.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  5. Re:Correlation: Food vs. IQ? by thefirelane · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Did people in 1850 need to consume Prozac just to cope with their own lives?

    No, they had other problems that kept them from thinking of those things:
    • Starving to death
    • Cholera
    • Freezing during the winter
    • Smallpox
    People during those times were depressed too, they just used alcohol (that's what most medicines were then anyway) People who were rich enough that they didn't have to worry about the things listed above had the same 'problems' you allude to the general population having today. It is only that now enough people are well off enough to sit around and worry about such higher level problems.
  6. standards in the UK by salparadyse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Speaking as a parent in the UK I have to agree with the general sentiment of the article, though I can't speak about the percentages, not being in possession of the statistics. One only has to listen to the Universities saying "we now have to set basic literacy and numeracy tests for all 18 year olds as part of the entrance process" to know that something is very wrong.
    It's the "all shall have prizes" culture where children aren't told "that's wrong, go and do it again" lest we scar them for life and someone brings a law suit.

  7. Re:Chavs today, punks yesterday. by turgid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's nothing special about the chav "movement" of today. It's much like the punks of the late 1970s. They wear different clothes, but the attitude is still the same.

    Chavs are nothing like the punks of the late 1970s.

    The punks were politically-motivated and rebelling against the Establishment, and even the establishment in popular culture.

    Chavs are just brain-dead zombies. They're apathetic, ignorant, uneducated, and wouldn't know what Politics were if the Sun or News of the World attempted to explain to them. As for culture, they're at the forefront of the establishment of pop culture. Just look at BBC Top of The Pops. Those orange whingers in the top 10 are just what your average(sic) chav is "in to."

  8. Re:Chavs today, punks yesterday. by FyRE666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is that chavs and chavettes in the UK are rewarded for their lives of crime and sponging with nice free handouts from the dole office, cash for their bastard kids, free housing any any other benefits these parasites can grab. Thus, they have plenty of time to spawn more idiot children than intelligent people, holding down jobs to pay for this vermin. Since the idiots are spawning idiot sprogs much faster than intelligent people are producing normal offspring, it drags the average IQ down.

    I think everyone who is able to work should receive no money whatsoever from the government until they've worked continuously for at least 5 years. Give them food and clothes plus shelter for the night, but that's it. It's time the culture of laziness, expecting people to bail them out was over.

  9. Well perhaps we were lucky by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Take a record player. You can see how it works. You can pull tricks with it. I remember long before you had those little computer chip greeting cards with a speaker you had small record players with a pin attached to a bit of plastic and you turned the record by hand and you got a sound. Sorta. Anyway you could actually see the science in action. Good luck doing that with a CD player. It is a black box.

    Same with a lot of other stuff. I could help out with fixing the car. Well stand by but you could actually see stuff and the adults could actually do things themselves. Todays cars? Black boxes.

    I learned a lot about electricity helping out with a model railroad. Pokemon is a nice game but it is played on another black box.

    But lets face it, the rot started without especially your generation. YOU are the one raising these 11 year olds and we just don't have the need to get down and dirty anymore.

    Odd thing about the sexual revolution? Rather then men learning how to cook as well now nobody learns how to cook. Freaky.

    As our tech increases we need less and less knowledge about it. My mom knew how to wire a fuse. I know how to screw in one. My kid knows how to throw a circuit breaker. Wich one of us would be more likely to be able to get a car moving when there is no replacement fuse available?

    Maybe parents need to get more involved with their kids. Nah.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  10. So? Live and learn by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Perhaps that is one of the reasons practical knowledge is decreasing. To much protection. Summertime we played in the local "river" all the time. Kids where I live now? There is a fence around the pond(?) because some kid might fall in.

    A nice dose of 220 through your hand will teach you more about electricity then any classroom lecture.

    As for wiring a fuse with say a screwdriver. Sometimes you just got to do stuff that is unsafe. If we only did was what safe we would still be up a tree somewhere in africa. (or for the religious people, inside the garden of eden)

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:So? Live and learn by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thats right, some of the best holidays I had as a kid were with the Scouts and with the School and they were of a nature which would pretty much prevent them from happening nowadays.

      For example with the Scouts we'd go camping to some of the big organised camps but our leader ( and only adult ) would make sure we got the tent up OK and then go back home for the weekend. Although there were other adults within a quarter of mile or so of us we were basically unsupervised and in charge a number of large axes, saws, petrol, gas and boxes and boxes of matches. Needless to say we had a great time and no one ever got seriously injured because we very quickly learned for ourselves the dangers of playing catch with large felling axes ( and that chopping up trees with them was more fun anyway ). We learned several important lessons about looking after ourselves and as a group from these camps; if no one cooks any food we all get very hungry, if no one gets up early to light the fire cold baked beans don't taste very nice, its better for people not to be constantly arguing with each other, if we look like we are looking after ourselves and everyone looks healthy and happy no one comes to interfere and we can do what we like etc etc etc.

      There is no way anyone would let a group of 12 - 15 year olds go camping without any direct supervision nowadays for fear of the inevitable law suit as soon as someone chops their hand off with an axe.

  11. Re:Kids have lost conservation laws by bmgoau · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is that society has removed the negative effects of making a mistake or doing seomthing wrong, so theres no impulse for most people to attempt success.

    In Australia, its called Occupational Health and Safty. I can see its purpose, making our lives safer through law, but the negative effects could be as large as what the article describes. A wildcard example that is very common, through law, in all workplaces now, is that kettles now have to be labled as hot. Toasters need to be labled as dangerous because of their electric contents.

    Darwin described it many years ago, and called it Natural Selection. Developed society has removed the implications of being weak, and therefore made them as equal as the strong in their chances for success.

    Its tough to say, but these days, to many children are stressed beyond belief at school, but in the wrong way. At school more work = smarter children, but this never happens if all that work is done incorrectly and then not corrected. To much these days children arn't told: You failed or Thats incorrect, do it again. In the current education system in Australia there is no fail. the marks on every single course range from 50 to 100.

    People learn via a combination of things. 1. The rewards of succeeding, 2. Fear of failure and 3. Having initative enough to learn from mistakes.

    The ultra clean environment we have made for our children is apparently weakening their immune systems. The ultra safe environment, is removeing their addaptive ability. The ultra success society, is removeing the distinction between success and failure. And the ultra information society, is removing the need for general knowlege. Sure, there are alot of good kids out there, alot of smart kids, who take the initative. But society is focused on protecting, not helping those who fail.

    We have smart people, working, to pay taxes, to ensure that the people who dont work, have enough money to pay their bills for pay tv and alcohol while their kids run wild. All the same time as the smart people are having fewer and fewer children.

    Another problem is that these days, the devices and tools the occupy out childrens lives cant be as easily taken apart. When i was young, i remember building a radio, playing with instructionless technic, playing with electronics, looking at motors. But now, the iPod cant be oppened, the motors in lawn mowers can only be touched by a licenced dealer, and Lego comes with specially designed pieces and themed instructions.

    I hate to say it. But society needs to bring back the difference between success and failure, and therefore provide the impulse for people to learn from their mistakes, not their text books.

    We need to bring back natural selection.

    The best tool we have left in our stock now, is the combination of the economy and law enforcement. If the failures turn to crime, they might die or be arrested. If the failures want a job to support themselves they have to conform to that jobs regulations: pants, a tie and knowlege on a specific area. Sadly, the huge amount of welfare and the effect of liability in decreasing the law enforcement powers of the police have made these weapons weak.

  12. The intelligent aren't having children by mc6809e · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Intelligence is heritable and the intelligent are having fewer children than the dull.

    Intelligence is aborting/abstaining/contracepting itself out of existence and leaving the world to the idiots.