Publishers Say 'Fact-Checking Too Costly'
Mr. Ghost writes "Members of the book publishing industry say that profit margins are too small to fact check "non-fiction" books. Instead they rely on the "honesty" of the authors submitting the book. This has come to a head with the revelation from the author of "Million Little Pieces" that he lied about the accounts in his memoirs."
Shouldn't the headline read Publishers Admit Wikipedia is More Accurate Than Books?
I didn't even have time to fact-check this reply!
org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
Filing taxes is a big pain, too, so maybe I'll just give that one a miss this year and see how that turns out...
Have fun,
Nathan 'Nato' Uno
http://web.unos.net/
Hopefully people like Oprah will at least fact-check stuff before hanging their credibility out to dry.
Maybe they'll spell check too
[Fuck Beta]
o0t!
Already exists --- we just have to ask google.
For example: "Global warming is true" --- 774 results. "Global warming is false" --- 352 results. Case closed!
(in other controversial results, evolution wins by 76,000 to 21,000 and Santa Claus is clearly real.)
Repton.
They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
I don't believe you.
Cause my father taught me not to believe everything I read on Slashdot.
[Fuck Beta]
o0t!
"when it was more important to be right and honest than to sell tons of books/magazines/newspapers?"
...
Think of the poor shareholders
think
.
---
"Money has a strong influence on the weak minded."
--Oprah-Wan Kenobi.
If you had read it, you'd feel duped too.
This is slashdot. Even if you haven't read it, you'll feel duped in 48 hours.