Slashdot Mirror


Evolution of Video Game Controllers

Ant writes "This Revolution Advanced article takes a look at the evolution of controllers from the days of Atari 2600 to Nintendo Revolution." Tragically the Intellivision controller is missing. But oh the nostalgia.

1 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. It's just a human interface device by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Troll

    Not a "revolution". A revolution would maybe be a HID you plug into your brain. But as long as controller means "take it into your hand and manipulate it with your fingers", it's still the same old thing.

    Keyboard, mouse, joystick, gamepad, whatever. The idea is to make the machine do what I want it to do. How this is accomplished, and which way is "best" is determined by the application, not the input device. The input device is the necessary evil to make the machine do my bidding.

    In fact, how is the revolution controller REALLY going to be used? Let's be reasonable here, how many games can you see that will really take advantage (and make good use) of that cool "three dimensional movement" gadget? Can you see yourself aiming your gun this way? Can you see yourself guiding Mario through the levels by waving the controller like Harry Potter flicks his wand?

    In fact, it looks a little like an oversized NES stick, and I fear it might be limited to that use.

    And I hope and pray that I'm wrong, 'cause ... well, what other console do you want to buy, hmm?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.