Slashdot Mirror


Police Restrict Public Photography

An anonymous reader writes "News.com is reporting that in Australia, recent attempts by a photo club to take pictures of industrial installations was met with police resistance. From the article: 'Club member Hans Kawitski was told not to photograph industrial installations and was ordered to inform members of the camera club to follow his lead. Liberty Victoria said its advice to photographers would be to ignore the directive. "The police have got no place making such warnings," president Brian Walters SC said.'"

5 of 490 comments (clear)

  1. No photographs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... but CCTV is fine. Mmmm, double standards.

  2. You have to understand by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it's the government or some corporation, it's good. If it's you, it's bad.

    For other examples, look at rootkits, spying, lying... the list goes on.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. And now from someone who RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, let's assume for a minute that the article supports your statement that "some cops just warned them" or that you merely forgot to cite a secondary source which includes this information.

    You're okay with the police "just warning" people not do things they have every legal right to do, even though doing those things won't cause anyone any harm? What exactly are they warning them about then? A warning implies a threat, and in the lack of any other threat, whose left but the very police doing the warning? That's intimidation.

    You seem to be arguing that just because the police can't legally stop people from taking the photographs that it isn't a "ban" or "restriction". It certainly sounds like they're trying to restrict people to me. They're just not doing so legally and their reasons are unclear.

    And, by the way, there are plenty of "damn things" the police can do if you don't cooperate - especially if they're corrupt.

  4. Re:There was a good reason for this paranoia... by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And of course the spies would have never thought of hidden, miniature cameras in buttons, purses, books and what not, yes? The actual purposes this (and many other equally ridiculous) prohibitions served were to: intimidate the population, empower the police to arrest people wantonly on a multitude of pretexts and to create a false impression that the state vigilantly guards you against the Emmanuel Goldsteins of the world. I feel rather sad that so many people fall for such obvious psych-ops manouvers.

  5. That is... by laughingcoyote · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When an official lies to the public, it is patriotism. When the public lies to an official, it is perjury.

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.