Slashdot Mirror


Ubisoft to Distribute RE4 For PC

Gamasutra has the word that Ubisoft will be distributing Capcom's titles for PC audiences. From the article: "The deal covers North American and European territories; no details on which company would distribute the PC games in Japan, if any, were given. The first of the three titles to hit shelves will be Onimusha 3, the oldest of the games, so presumably the deal has been in the works for some time. Still unclear is whether Capcom is porting the games to PC internally, or whether a third party is handling the console-to-PC conversions. Onimusha 3 will be released in both territories in February 2006."

60 comments

  1. Will They Include Starforce Copy Protection? by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If Ubi is sticking with Starforce for these releases, I'm giving up on Ubi games. I'd like to keep my CD/DVD burner intact, thankyou.
    (Referring to the recent /. article about Starforce disabling/damaging CD/DVD burners here:http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/3 1/1721241)

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    1. Re:Will They Include Starforce Copy Protection? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Even without StarForce, Ubisoft's anticustomer measures are bad enough. I wouldn't buy any PC games from them, Starforce or not.

      On the upside, Starforce doesn't affect my burner.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:Will They Include Starforce Copy Protection? by Xymor · · Score: 0

      The damaging is probably bogus sice noone claimed the prize http://www.star-force.com/protection.phtml?c=261&i d=707

      SF protection is really a pain in as*, Especially if you have multiple titles installed. One update and your neverend nightmare begings.

    3. Re:Will They Include Starforce Copy Protection? by purple_cobra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The terms and conditions attached to that 'challenge' rendered it impossible to claim...
      My personal experience of Starforce hasn't been pleasant and, as such, I won't buy any games infected by that crapware. I'm also happy to direct friends away from Starforce-polluted titles, and encourage them not to support companies which use this method of copy-protection.
      I'm a fan of the Resident Evil series and it would have been great to see it running on a PC, but Ubisoft will almost certainly use Starforce to 'protect' these releases so it looks like I won't be buying the PC version of RE4.

    4. Re:Will They Include Starforce Copy Protection? by cowwie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I'm sure people are just JUMPING at the chance to pay their own money to fly to Moscow with thier own equipment to prove under Starforce's conditions that their product is flawed. They make it so easy, it's an absolute wonder that a ton of people haven't claimed it yet.

      I'll offer $10,000 to anyone that can prove Katie Holmes isn't my sister, but to collect on it you have to meet me on the surface of Jupiter and perform all the necessary genealogical lookups there.

    5. Re:Will They Include Starforce Copy Protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All new Ubisoft releases come with Starforce. Stay away from Ubisoft.

    6. Re:Will They Include Starforce Copy Protection? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2

      Halfway through Onimusha 3, no starforce noticed ;)

    7. Re:Will They Include Starforce Copy Protection? by RedACE7500 · · Score: 1

      If you actually read the offer, they will pay travel costs and lodging costs for a 2-day stay.

    8. Re:Will They Include Starforce Copy Protection? by montyzooooma · · Score: 1

      Can we have a new -1 Smug mod, please? And on topic - ish - I embraced Starforce so I could play Space Rangers(2) and haven't had a single problem with my DVD burner. Course my DVD burner is in another computer. (hmm. That sounded kinda smug.)

    9. Re:Will They Include Starforce Copy Protection? by Psykus · · Score: 1

      You forget to mention, that to claim the prize, you'd have to fly to Moscow.

  2. Onimushu! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now that's cool!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  3. StarForce? by cosmotron · · Score: 0

    How does StarForce protection work?

    --
    Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
  4. What about the chainsaw? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will PC gamers get one of those neat bloody chainsaw controllers to play with?

    1. Re:What about the chainsaw? by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking not, but a USB to controller adapter and your mowing down zombies just like your console bretheren.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    2. Re:What about the chainsaw? by 2008 · · Score: 1

      Adaptors are pretty cheap. This one works under linux too - good for Neverball and Stepmania.

      --
      I quit!
    3. Re:What about the chainsaw? by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      Yep. If you've got spare Xbox, PS2, Dreamcast or GC controllers, you can use one of these: http://www.lik-sang.com/info.php?category=29&produ cts_id=4532& or http://www.lik-sang.com/info.php?category=163&prod ucts_id=3174& or you can make one yourself: http://www.llamma.com/xbox/Mods/xbox_controller_to _pc_usb.htm

  5. Ha ha, yeah by Pluvius · · Score: 1

    no details on which company would distribute the PC games in Japan, if any, were given.

    Good one, Gamasutra! Mainstream games on the PC in Japan, what a jest...

    Rob

  6. So... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    1.) Slow Sales Year
    2.) Rehash console games for Windows PC's
    3.) ???
    4.) Profit!

    This has never really worked out if history is to be trusted, but hey, give 'er hell Capcom.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  7. Re:Had to be said... by jclast · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why was this modded 'Offtopic'?

    PC stands for, say it with me, "Personal Computer." There is no mention of operating system. I have two PCs at home. Only one runs Windows.

    I sincerely doubt these ports will run on my Red Hat PC.

    How much harder would it have been to write "Ubisoft to Distribute RE4 For Windows"?

    --
    e2 | LJ
  8. I like this! by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personally, I'm very pleased to hear this. I spend 95% of my gaming time on a PC. Only recently have I been able to go back to consoles, but that's strictly to appease my five-year-old daughter who loves Mario Kart 64. I'm sorry, but I would rather buy a new video card (sub-$200) than plunk down twice that for a new PS2, accessories, and games. The used console market might help to swing that in the future, though.

    There are a number of really cool console games that I'd love to play, but I'm not going to buy an entire console just for a single game. I wouldn't even force myself to upgrade my PC if it was just for a single game. So, to see good console games like Onimusha 3 and (drool) Resident Evil 4 being released for the PC is very welcome.

    As to StarForce, Ubi is just the distributor, not the developer. I know that StarForce games like most recent Splinter Cell were developed by Ubi. They had more to lose by piracy of their games. If Capcom is the actual developer, does Ubi have any real say as distributors? Besides, after the crap that has recently happened with Sony's rootkit, I would think that fewer and fewer people would be willing to tolerate suddenly losing devices due to the StarForce protection. Ubi should tread lightly when it comes to that.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:I like this! by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      Right now, you can get a GameCube, Super Smash Brothers, Resident Evil 4, Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker, Metroid Prime, and Animal Crossing all new for $200 before tax. Value gaming is on the consoles especially at this time in the generation cycle.

      And I don't know about anyone else, but I am fed up wrestling with PC games to get them to work correctly.

    2. Re:I like this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see:

      If I purchased a GameCube when it came out, with a memory card and extra controller, it would cost me less than $300 with taxes. So far you're ahead. The Revolution comes out 5 years later, so I'd be buying games for it for that long. Let's say a game a month, which I don't buy, but that works out to 60 months x 30 dollars (yeah, I buy most of my games used), comes to $1,800. Total cost: $2,100.

      How much does an "ok" gaming PC cost? There's a lot of articles which will spec out a gaming rig for under $1,000, so let's take that figure. You buy the $1,000 PC 5 years ago (a whopping 1 Ghz CPU, 64 Mb card, 256 Mb of ram). Assuming you buy the same amount of games for 5 years, at $20 each (yeah, PC games drop in prices quicker), comes out to $1,200. You're only $100 above the price of a console, which isn't bad.

      Now keep in mind that you'll have to upgrade your computer as more demanding games come out. Let's say you upgrade graphics cards every 2 years, that's $400. You'll need more RAM and a faster CPU at least once, but your motherboard doesn't accept the new chips and/or RAM. Another $400 for those 3 items. All of a sudden you're $900 bucks over the GameCube, which gives you an additional 30 games for it.

      To top it off, games released 4 years after the purchase of your PC will look like crap on it. Meanwhile, games graphics only improve during the lifetime of a console (see Resident Evil 4, for example).

      I think I'll stick with the GameCube.

    3. Re:I like this! by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not against getting a GameCube, particularly with Nintendo's primary push towards the kinds of games that I would let my daughter play. However, in my opinion (which I know will be taken totally the wrong way by console fan-boys) a console is just a console. Yes, I know, that's what it's meant to be. But my PC is far, far more than just a gaming machine, which is why I prefer to dump my geek cash into that. And because I have enough systems laying around (minimum of 1.4 GHz) for every member of my family and more, another piece of hardware is difficult to justify. Unfortunately, saying anything not 100% positive towards consoles has a tendency to bring out the venom in a lot of Slashdotters, which is why I normally drift away from console/PC transition stories.

      And I don't know about anyone else, but I am fed up wrestling with PC games to get them to work correctly.

      I really need an explanation to that one. I haven't had to wrestle with PC games to get them to work since the days of DOS and Windows 95. Either you're talking out of an orifice that isn't meant to engage in speech, or you have a really low level of tolerance. If you're referring to hardware problems, there are a ton of reasons why that would be a problem, not the least of which is buying non-standardized hardware or looking at price above all else. Sorry, but that's just the way it's been in the PC world for over a decade. Don't know if that the case with you, but that's been my experience over the past 17 years that I've been building PCs.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    4. Re:I like this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a parent, I'd rather my kids played games on a console. I'd like to be in control of the content they have access to, which is kind of difficult to do with computers.

      Want a couple of examples? I don't mind my son playing Tomb Raider, but I don't want him applying the nude patch so he can watch Lara Croft's titties bouncing around on the screen. I also don't want him applying the Hot Coffee mod while playing GTA. These things are almost impossible to do on a console. You buy the game, and you know what your kid will be playing.

    5. Re:I like this! by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      Wait, so you're fine with your kid playing GTA: San Andreas, but you're deathly afraid of him seeing an unclothed female?

      Yet another excellent example of why people should have to apply for a license before they bring children into this world.

    6. Re:I like this! by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Please get a clue. A computer costs more than a console, but it DOES MORE THAN JUST PLAY GAMES. The money I spend on my computer is also put to use on actually do productive things, not just games. For me, a console is a complete waste of money because it is only used for games, which is a luxury I can perfectly do without. Will you console zealots ever grasp this concept? (I guess not)

    7. Re:I like this! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, saying anything not 100% positive towards consoles has a tendency to bring out the venom in a lot of Slashdotters, which is why I normally drift away from console/PC transition stories.


      I'll try to keep the venom to a minimum.

      However, in my opinion (which I know will be taken totally the wrong way by console fan-boys) a console is just a console. Yes, I know, that's what it's meant to be. But my PC is far, far more than just a gaming machine, which is why I prefer to dump my geek cash into that.


      Yes a console is just a console, most of the time. There are exceptions, like the Playstation 2 Linux kit, which I have. So my console is more than just a gaming machine. :-)

      I see it this way, a computer can play games, yes, but it's base architecture not specifically designed and optimized to do so. It does so with kludgy brute force, which works...mostly. My PS2 is a far better gaming device than my computer is.. The experience for me, is just so much better on the console.

       
      Either you're talking out of an orifice that isn't meant to engage in speech, or you have a really low level of tolerance. I He's not talking out of his ass. I've experienced enough annoyances to turn me off of gaming on a PC I want it to just work, without hassles, and with good user experience.
    8. Re:I like this! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      As I replied to another poster, your PC plays games but the x86 architecture isn't optimized and designed for it. It's a brute force inelegant kludge. It works, just not very well.

      People buy specialized hardware for various other purposes so why not games.

  9. Re:Had to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when has PC gaming meant anything other than Windows?

    Well, besides before the invention of windows, of course.

    There's still hope. Wine is not an emulator! Besides, why do you need to play games? You use your computer to do grown up things, like read slashdot.

  10. Re:Had to be said... by jclast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Marathon - Great PC game. Mac exclusive.
    WoW - Playable on a Mac.
    Doom 3 - Playable on Linux.

    I don't think PC game means what you think it means.

    --
    e2 | LJ
  11. So maybe I can finally play RE4... by DoktorSeven · · Score: 2, Insightful

    despite owning both a Gamecube and PS2. Reason? Hopefully will be able to aim with a mouse, rather than the horribly imprecise analog controllers.

    I've tried to play RE4 for Gamecube, but ultimately the frustration of trying to use an oversensitive analog stick to do something that requires precision -- aiming -- made me quickly give up the game in frustration, just like most console shooter games. The precision of the mouse for aiming just can't be beat.

    And yep, I know bazillions of console fanboys will jump on me and tell me I'm wrong, how aiming with the analog stick is just as good (or better) than the mouse, etc. You do know lying gives you cancer, right? Okay, I'm kidding about the lying giving you cancer. But seriously, I just don't see it. You people must have robot implants that give you superhuman precision or something. Don't think I'm anti-console either, I do own both the Cube and PS2. No games that require your robot-enhanced precision, though.

    I (for one) welcome our new robot implant-enhanced overlords.

    --
    This is a sig. Deal with it.
    1. Re:So maybe I can finally play RE4... by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      I've got RE4 for the GC and the PS2, if you think the analogue stick is twitchy and annoying on the Cube you should try the PS2 version! I don't know why but all PS2 games seem to have a massive dead zone on the analogue sticks, it's like 50% dead zone, leaving the other 50% for analogue control. And since the sticks have such a small range of movement anyway they're practically digital. I can't work out if it's just the sticks are badly designed or if Sony require all developers to put large dead zones in for players who don't really get what analogue is for.

      While I certainly always prefer the mouse over the analogue stick for aiming, I didn't find it too egregious to use the GC's analogue stick and I got quite adept at shooting the Ganados in the head... until their heads started exploding to reveal some nasty creature that's even hard to kill...

      So yeah I'll be buying the PC version definitely, but I won't be surprised if the controls don't translate very well, Rockstar made an awful mess when they converted San Andreas to the PC when they forced you to hold a button down to aim. Konami made a real hash of MGS2 when they converted it, so I'm crossing my fingers that Capcom don't make the same mistakes.

      Also you probably still won't be able to move while aiming and the aiming might not be quick and responsive like we're used to from other third person shooters like Max Payne, Jedi Knight 2 or Vice City. And instead of WASD controlling forward, back and strafing, I'll bet it will do forward, back and turn left/right. If my guesses are correct it might actually be easier to hook up a joypad to play it rather than get frustrated at the controls mimicking the standard FPS layout but with annoying differences.

    2. Re:So maybe I can finally play RE4... by fondue · · Score: 1

      Oddly, I find RE4 to be perhaps the only console game that requires stick-controlled aiming that makes it work. You very rarely have to move your aiming reticle through large arcs, and in most cases monsters come at you in a fairly slow and manageable fashion. It's all about small, precise corrections to your aim. Also, it's great to finally play a game where pistols aren't weak and/or hopelessly imprecise over a distance. Even the shooting gallery is more enjoyable than frustrating, given a little concentration.

      I'd be more worried that PC FPS-style aiming would make the game too easy.

      --

      Preferences > Homepage > Customize stories on homepage > Authors > Zonk > Uncheck

    3. Re:So maybe I can finally play RE4... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on. I normally hate all console FPSes and games that make you aim with the analog sticks, because I pretty much only game on a PC, but RE4 wasn't difficult at all.

    4. Re:So maybe I can finally play RE4... by Dark_Lord_Prime · · Score: 1

      3rd-person shooters/action/platform, I can do with dual-stick controllers.

      1st-person shooters, however, suck large, hairy donkey balls on consoles.

      RE4 on my Cube had a learning-curve, to get me past being firmly entrenched in RE's 'traditional' control-scheme mindset, but after 20 or 30 minutes, I had it in hand, and after an hour or three, it was second nature.

      I was eagerly looking forward to Area 51, but when I popped in my PSM(I think) demo disc and tried to play it, I was accosted by those god-awful FPS console controls and, try as I might, could NOT get used to them OR be able to move and aim at the same time.

      FPS games NEED a mouse(or, in my case, trackball) and keyboard. I cannot understand how anybody can manage twitch-fests with dual analog stick controls, where one controls movement and the other controls looking around, while you're trying desperately to keep your fingers on the right buttons to do umpteen things all at once in the middle of an onslaught of enemies.

      Most of all, they absolutely HAVE to support key remapping. How hard is it to assign button functions to variables, and allow the player to reassign those variables to whichever buttons we want? Do NOT force us to use the controls that YOU happen to be most comfortable with. Let US set them up so WE'RE comfortable.

    5. Re:So maybe I can finally play RE4... by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      I perfer the mouse myself but honestly I think RE4 suits the cube more. Once you get used to the twitchiness you can snipe people with in the blink of an eye. You learn exactly where to shoot and where, but the first 30 minutes I was sucking majorly.. just didn't work for me.

      Go back and give it a try.. you may even find it easier with everything in 1 place instead of having to do everything but aim with 1 hand.

      --
      I like muppets.
    6. Re:So maybe I can finally play RE4... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      You'll have to hope they trebled the number of enemies, or the amount of damage they can give and take, or made them 1/6th the size, because otherwise the game's going to be trivially easy to play. Of course, watching Leon piroette on the spot like an extra from a John Woo movie, shooting zombies all the while, will be hilarious.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:So maybe I can finally play RE4... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1
      but ultimately the frustration of trying to use an oversensitive analog stick to do something that requires precision -- aiming -- made me quickly give up the game in frustration, just like most console shooter games. The precision of the mouse for aiming just can't be beat. And yep, I know bazillions of console fanboys will jump on me and tell me I'm wrong, how aiming with the analog stick is just as good (or better) than the mouse, etc. I just don't see it. You people must have robot implants that give you superhuman precision or something.


      No serious offense intended, and I'm not really being serious but:

      PC gamers are so ham fisted.

      I think perhaps in part, you became used to the old style PC joysticks and making larger movements that your thumb muscles are simply not trained to do the small precise movements an analog thumbstick requires.

      In other words, you need more practice.

      That said, FPS"s designed for the console, say Timesplitters play better with the sticks than ported PC FPS's do.

      (your friendly robotic implant enhanced console playing overlord)
    8. Re:So maybe I can finally play RE4... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1
      3rd-person shooters/action/platform, I can do with dual-stick controllers.


      oh yes, even if the game also has first person modes like SOCOM or Star Wars Battlefront.

      1st-person shooters, however, suck large, hairy donkey balls on consoles.


      I disagree, if they're designed for the console the sticks work fine, it's the ports that have trouble. I use a hybrid control with the PC ports analog joypad in the left hand ( I detest WASD) and mouse in the right.

      I
      cannot understand how anybody can manage twitch-fests with dual analog stick controls, where one controls movement and the other controls looking around, while you're trying desperately to keep your fingers on the right buttons to do umpteen things all at once in the middle of an onslaught of enemies.


      It's easy, once you learn how. You're not using the face buttons often, mostly the shoulder buttons.

    9. Re:So maybe I can finally play RE4... by DoktorSeven · · Score: 1

      I don't know why but all PS2 games seem to have a massive dead zone on the analogue sticks, it's like 50% dead zone, leaving the other 50% for analogue control. And since the sticks have such a small range of movement anyway they're practically digital.

      This is exactly what I have experienced with most, if not all, aiming systems for consoles. There are some notable exceptions (SW:Battlefront for PS2 is actually somewhat playable for me, since moving the analog stick just a little in any direction actually moves the aiming cursor slowly, which actually makes sense, unlike other games that seem to require barely touching the stick for slow, and any actual motion in any direction means "take the cursor and whip it to the other side of the screen in 1/60th of a second".

      Hey, developers, fix your aiming on console shooters. Thanks.

      --
      This is a sig. Deal with it.
  12. Re:Had to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Claim was not a proof that could easily be dismissed by providing a few examples. It was a statement, about the general state of non-windows PC gaming. This state is currently "Goodwill driven" rather than "Profit Driven" like the state of PC gaming. Ignoring Cross-platform designed games (Not dual platform designed games, I will admit that they fall into the "Goodwill driven" category) Stuff like Flash games and the like fall into cross-platform.

    I think that limiting the majority of big budget game titles to one strict operating system is a good thing, as it creates better tools based on a mostly predictable specification. Let windows handle resources, you just scale to those resources so you can concentrate on gameplay and story.

    Now I could be off base, but thats my 2 cents.

  13. Onimusha 3 by HaMMeReD3 · · Score: 1

    Although a good game, I've been playing the pc version for about a month and I have to say they are lazy as hell when they do these ports. The characters and in-game manuals refer to playstation controls, while the config settings for the controls are on a per-action database. So there are definatly times of confusion when playing the game trying to figure out the right keys to press.

    The game is fun with an x-arcade though, and it runs at insanely high resolutions and looks great on a pc, high res textures and all.

    1. Re:Onimusha 3 by Bodhammer · · Score: 1
      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
  14. RE4 won't look rehashed by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    as long as they use the GameCube port as a basis. SFA2 was ported to PC, but for whatever reason they used the playstation as the basis. Had they used the arcade with every animation frame intact it would have been pretty impressive at the time.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  15. Stop comparing the $$$ of PCs with consoles!! by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    God, I despise when people try to compare the dollar values!!

    If my PC did only games, then I would have no excuse at balking when there is the discussion of buying a console and your comparison would be complete valid. But you know very well that $$$ for consoles cannot be compared to $$$ for PCs because different people have different percieved values out of each!

    My PC does a ton of other things: video editing, audio editing, web surfing, helping me to maintain my web pages, filing my tax returns, printing off coloring pages for the kids, graphics manipulation, pr0n -- whoops! -- word processing, desktop publishing, buying and selling on eBay, ripping CDs, DVD authoring, and so on and so on. The VALUE that I get out of my PC far exceeds anything that a console can do! This is why I'm pleased to hear that titles that are normally reserved for consoles are coming out for PCs. That increases my PC's value to me.

    Now, conversely, if you spend more time with your console and you get more enjoyment from your console, then the value that you get out of it probably exceeds the value that you get out of your PC. In that case I would expect you to be willing to put more money into consoles than into your PC.

    But until such time as people can get the SAME functions and values out of both consoles and PC so that both are on a more level playing field (no pun intended), comparing dollars between the two is blindy arrogant and worst and ludicrous at best!

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Stop comparing the $$$ of PCs with consoles!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. When you add the extra functionality of a PC, then the extra money required for PC gaming makes sense.

      However, I think the extra features of a PC are offset by the fact that you have to "maintain" it. You know - apply OS updates, software patches, new drivers, configure the hardware and run an anti-virus scanner once in a while. While many of these tasks can be automated, they still require some attention.

      Meanwhile, you pop a game into a console and play. Not everyone is interested in having total control over their hardware - this is why some people run Windows, and other use Linux. If you just want to play games, then go for a console. If you don't mind fiddling with your hardware to play games, stick with the PC.

    2. Re:Stop comparing the $$$ of PCs with consoles!! by CronoCloud · · Score: 1
      But until such time as people can get the SAME functions and values out of both consoles and PC so that both are on a more level playing field (no pun intended), comparing dollars between the two is blindy arrogant and worst and ludicrous at best!


      That time is getting closer. I've been of the firm opinion for some time now that most peoples computing needs could be met by a "souped up" game console. That's what the Commodore 64 and Amiga's essentially were

      Imagine, say, a Playstation 3 "Live" Linux distro.(SCE actually had a test "Live" disc for the PS2)or perhaps more likely LInux installed on the HD.

      And you know what, if people didn't game on PC's it would probably make Microsfot/Dell/Gateway happy, due to reduced support costs from all those people who call them with: "I just bought this game and it doesn't work" issues. They've said that a goodly portion of their support costs are game related.

  16. Re:FIST SPORT! by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this is going to turn out? The game has always been best on console, ever since the first release on the Sega Saturn... but for PC? In a way, I like this idea, but I really don't know. I'm just hoping they don't start putting the game on the PC with every release. That's one of the console's bragging rights -- the exclusive titles such as Resident Evil, Metal Gear Solid (even though they released the orignal on PC after about three years), etc.

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  17. Mod parent up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starforce is a seriously threatening piece of malware.

    Whoever modded the parent as off-topic is an ignorant moron.

  18. Here comes the PC bashing. by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    Want a couple of examples? I don't mind my son playing Tomb Raider, but I don't want him applying the nude patch so he can watch Lara Croft's titties bouncing around on the screen.

    And exactly how does that have anything to do with giving me examples of getting the game "to work properly"? The game is working exactly like the patch told it to work. It's not what you wanted it to do, but it is without question working ... and working properly at that.

    And by the way, it's called "parenting". If you give your kid a computer in a room where you can't see what he's doing *and* he has the administrative rights to modify files that you don't want him to modify, that's not the PC's fault.

    Oh, and you might want to look around and read about how people are getting fed up with the cheats that are happening through XBox Live. You know, a console? One that you are implying is invulnerable to hacks because it's a console?

    Sounds more like you simply took advantage of any excuse to do a bit of PC bashing.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Here comes the PC bashing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That post had nothing to do with bashing computers. The poster was saying that when you buy a game that's rated T for a console, it can't be turned into an R rated game with a patch.

      Games on the computer can be modified very easily, but as a parent s/he doesn't want their kids to do that. S/he can buy a PS2 game and know exactly what the child will be exposed to. That's also called parenting.

  19. Re:Had to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows means a lot of things too. Is the game for Windows 3.1? Windows Mobile?
    It's quite likely the game won't even run on Win95 or Server 2003...

    So, we can either all be pointless specific, or just leave it as what anyone interested in playing these ports will understand it to mean.
    And DON'T YOU FUCKING DARE claim to be interested in playing them if you don't have a windows PC. Not having a windows gaming PC means you aren't interested enough, and there's nothing stopping you dual booting.

  20. How Starforce works and how to tell if you have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Article showing the hidden cd drivers installed and describes the "protection" method.

    http://www.boingboing.net/2006/01/30/anticopying_m alware_.html

  21. Re:Had to be said... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    I'm use a console to read Slashdot., you insensitive clod :-)

    Truly.

  22. That's the good thing about consoles by LKM · · Score: 1
    a console is just a console.

    And that's a good thing :-)

    I can't play games on my PC. Sitting down in front of it immediately puts me into work mode...

    The Cube is cheap, less then 99 bucks, starts up in a few seconds, needs no installation, has no problem with stupid copy protection destroying your drives, will still work with your games in 5 or 10 years. Try playing a 10 years old game on your current PC :-)

    1. Re:That's the good thing about consoles by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

      Try playing a 10 years old game on your current PC :-)

      That's why I have a separate Pentium 233 with PC-DOS 7, WFW 3.11, and a CPU slowdown utility. Those 10 year old games run just fine. :)

      There are also a number of freeware projects out there, like DOSbox and SCUMMVM, to let people play those old games on newer hardware. Believe it or not, they've actually done a fairly good job at letting you play those older games.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  23. Re:Had to be said... by jclast · · Score: 1

    I have a Windows PC. I just don't like the current thought that "if it's a PC, it must run Windows" because that's simply not true.

    I admit, there is little gaming on Linux, but I'm sure there are gamers out there that use a Mac primarily.

    --
    e2 | LJ