Slashdot Mirror


Kama Sutra Worm Hits Softly

An anonymous reader writes "Despite warnings of the danger posed by the Kama Sutra worm, ZDNet is reporting that things haven't been nearly as bad as expected." From the article: "There have been 'no reports of any (Kama Sutra) detonations so far. Also, the virus seems to be dropping in e-mail prevalence. It was down to second place yesterday, according to our monitoring stations, and slid again into third place today,' Paul Ducklin, head of technology at Sophos Asia-Pacific, told ZDNet Australia. The worm's ranking was overtaken by MyDoom and Netsky variants, which have been around for a number of years. "

3 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. IT'S NOT A WORM! by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a virus.

    Surely Slashdot knows the difference? A virus/trojan relies on user stupidity. A worm relies on software insecurity.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:IT'S NOT A WORM! by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 5, Informative

      Really?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_worm

      A computer worm is a self-replicating computer program, similar to a computer virus. A virus attaches itself to, and becomes part of, another executable program; however, a worm is self-contained and does not need to be part of another program to propagate itself....The main difference between a computer virus and a worm is that a virus can not propagate by itself whereas worms can. A worm uses a network to send copies of itself to other systems and it does so without any intervention

      This thing (from what little I read) emails itself around when it can... which would qualify it as a worm.
      I'm a little fuzzy on the intervention part... the user has to to the initial activation, which could be intervention, but then again you have to do the initial activation with viruses, so I don't think that qualifies.

      This thing doesn't seem to make itself part of another executable persé, so it wouldn't quite qualify as a virus.

      Maybe I read my definitions wrong...

  2. Re:Comparisons to other worms are misleading by JesseL · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, from what I gather rain does cause more damage than tornadoes. In 1999 rain (floods) caused $5.4 billion in property damage in the US, while tornadoes caused $1.1 billion worth of damage.

    http://www.flooddamagedata.org/data/national331401 4-495.txt
    http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/sourcebook/torna does.html

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"