Slashdot Mirror
Flash Memory, a Look Back
An anonymous reader writes "XYZComputing has an interesting roundup of CompactFlash cards manufactured between 1998 and 2005. The cards go through a number of tests to see how the many changes which CF cards have undergone have affected their performance. One of the most interesting aspects of the article is a head-to-head comparison of "extreme" speed flash memory and that same company's less expensive standard model."
Rob Galbraith has a long more comprehensive list of CF cards rated by transfer to computer performance here:i d=6007-6133
i d=6007-6111
i d=6007
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?c
The Sandisk Extreme III 1G vs Sandisk Standard 1G on the CF to computer test scores 12.859MB/sec vs 2.377MB/sec
In my Canon 10D
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?c
1.387MB/sec vs 806K/sec (sorry slower older camera that can't reach the speeds of the newer DSLRs)
READ and WRITE speeds may be different. I'm more concerned with how quick the camera writes to the card (Galbraith's numbers) than how quick I can read the data off the card (XYZs numbers)
However...for my money battery life is more important. I'm more concerned with how much battery life the Extreme III vs the Standard card consumes.
I have a 128Mb Sandisk Standard and it drains the battery on my Canon 10D much more quickly than the 512Mb Extreme III that I have. And when the battery gets low on the camera I get an "Error #2" very quickly when using the standard card.
Unfortunately neither Galbraith or XYZ give any numbers on power consumption.
Galbraith goes into more detail on how to compare and review cards here:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?c
I can second this. I once swallowed mine and it went right through my digestive system and kept working. I was even able to was it with bleach to get the shit stink off it without harm.