Opera CEO on Devices, Linux, and Web 2.0
An anonymous reader writes "LinuxDevices has an interview with Jon S. von Tetzchner, co-founder and CEO of Opera Software, on the growing importance of device computing, Linux in the device space, browsers as an interface platform for Linux devices, and how future WHAT standards like WebForms 2.0 and Canvas will make the Web more usable on mobile computing devices of tomorrow."
Simultaneously both a question and a statement!
The WHAT working draft Web Applications 1.0 certainly looks like Ajax with its XMLHttpRequest, drag and drop and other Ajaxish stuff.
Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
With widgets (new in Opera9 Tech-Preview 2, examples here), opera is not only a web browser, its truly an application platform, capable of running independent programs. The current examples are true to the namesake, widgets, little gizmo's to show time &what not, but its the first time the graphical web is begin used as more than a browser page.
A little bit of polish is needed, but basically it's the only platform available for developing real SVG applications.
I hope Opera attempts to bring some real conformance to this entirely new class of web application. If it gets too proprietary its useless.
Myren
There isn't one single program capable of running on every single cellphone today. Not one. Even if you could get past the different screen sizes, processors, and operating systems (which is almost if not entirely impossible) then you run up against the carriers who turn of Bluetooth and other services to prevent you from buying third party ringtones. I have seen the future of mobile computing, and it is not on cellphones.
Opera Mini is running fine on my Treo 650...I grabbed the java files from here
Don't believe the claims that it won't work on t650 from Verizon...it works fine.
[Fuck Beta]
o0t!
Who cares about devices, linux, and Web 2.0? I want to hear about swimming the Atlantic Ocean.
If you can read this sig, you're too close.
I'm kind of proud of that; if Microsoft fails, you have a rescue system with Linux and Opera.
Entire operating systems, including TCP/IP stacks and browsers, can run from a single 1.44MB floppy disk. I believe QNX is one example, unless I'm thinking of another OS. Don't let bloated things like Windows and Linux make you believe that it you can't fit a desktop in less space.
WebForms is a fundamentally flawed specification. The data model and the presentation are combined, making it pretty inflexible. I've been playing around with XForms for a some time now, and while it's definitely very different, it's much more powerful than WebForms can ever be.
Opera has a partnership with Google, so everytime you do a Google search from the Opera toolbar, Google pays Opera. This is where the money for the desktop version is coming from.
The number of Opera stories on Slashdot has now gone way beyond the point where a dedicated Opera category/icon for Slashdot is needed. Even Mozilla and Netscape each form a subcategory on Slashdot, and they could arguably go under a single one.
The same goes for Qt, which always ends up under the KDE category, even when the story has nothing to do with KDE...
its the first time the graphical web is begin used as more than a browser page.
Umm... what about Dashboard widgets in Mac OS X tiger? They also are built out of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript (in that case, using Safari's WebKit rather than Opera's engine). In fact, the main differences seem to be that they use a different config file and the zipped bundles use a different structure.
There's been some discussion on the Opera forums as to compatibility, and last I looked the running theory was that it should be really simple to convert most widgets between Dashboard format and Opera format.
What is new is that this is (AFAIK) the first platform of its type that works on Windows, Mac OS and Linux. Dashboard is Mac-only, Konfabulator is Windows/Mac (and I beleive it's possible to write Windows-only or Mac-only Konfabulator -- excuse me, Yahoo Widgets). But you can write an Opera widget and run it on Windows, Mac, Linux, FreeBSD, etc. Add in the fact that Opera's big in the mobile market, and you've got a very wide non-web platform availble using web technologies.
I want to hear more about this. It would be so very cool to be able to connect to my fridge (via email, web, SMS, whatever) while at the grocery store, and find out what I need more of.
in there quest for ever larger profits (as if making billions is not good enough)
the mobile phone operators (on whose networks these devices run on) are killing inovation and use of networked services
i mean what good is having a mobile with the latest opera browser if that "really cool widget i want" will cost me a fortune to get at 10 a megabyte (yes vodafone and Co. do rip us off blindly!!!
i mean come on! on a broadband connection i can get 20 gigibytes of data for same price, which is ALOT of heavy browsing)
Indeed, you can read more about Opera Software's position on software patents. Opera is against software patents.
Clever signature text goes here.