Slashdot Mirror


Global Flyer Part 2

nsasch writes "The Global Flyer just wasn't enough for Steve Fossett. He's going again, this time to make the world's longest (in length) flight, ever. He is currently over the Atlantic ocean and can be tracked online. He will be flying for 3 days with 18000 pounds of fuel (~8164 kilograms). More information, tracking, Microsoft Flight Simulator models, and background images are available from Virgin Atlantic."

7 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Him again? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is so fascinating about Fossett? If he designed his own glider, I'd really be impressed. To me, he just seems like a rich guy who is doing what he wants to do in life... which I have no problem with. But, it seems like he has a PR staff who is constantly trumpeting: "Look at this guy! He is sooooo great" To me, that is a turn off.

    If you are breaking records to prove it to yourself... that is one thing. When you are buying media time to brag... then you are a loser in my book. A dam rich loser, but a loser nonetheless.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Him again? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To me, that is a turn off.

      Why? Would you date him if he wren't so full of himself? Sheesh... get over it.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Him again? by kozumik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, what's so amazing about what he's doing and why does our media cover this stuff? The endurance flights of old didn't have GPS, didn't have autopilot, they didn't have sattelite communications. It all individual skill done in isolation. What Fosset does could be accomplished by any decent pilot with a little determination, and a lot of money to blow on the technology, aids, and backups he has. A computer could fly it, with a monkey along for the ride, which is pretty close to how Fosset flies. Your ordinary anonymous test pilot is pushing the envelope way more than Fosset. Guys who fly small planes around the world in small hops have a way more adventures spirit than an endurance flier with GPS and autopilot who basically just stays up in the air and never taking any risks or requiring much skill. Acrobatic pilots are far more technically skilled. Your average bush pilot probably takes more risk and is a better pilot than Fosset. It's a lot of PR fluff.

    3. Re:Him again? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To me, he just seems like a rich guy who is doing what he wants to do in life... which I have no problem with. But, it seems like he has a PR staff who is constantly trumpeting: "Look at this guy! He is sooooo great" To me, that is a turn off.

      If you want to really get down to it, the whole X-prize was nothing more than a giant PR stunt. "Hey! look at us! we can get a bunch of rich guys to spend money! We're boldy going where man has been going for about 40 years now!"

      But before you break out the flamebait mods: It was a PR stunt with a purpose. Without the X-prize, private space flights would've remained a "neat idea." Now, in a few years, maybe (if you're rich enough. Or if you win a contest) you could take a quick flight into space. Ya blatant PR and shameless rich guy whoring!

      Yeah, we've already flown around the world and Fossett isn't exactly treading new ground. But maybe stunts like this spur on new advances in aviation. Maybe a company decides they want to be the next scaled composites and starts kicking money to R & D. Maybe somebody is inspired to look at the way things are being done and decides they can do better. Maybe.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  2. What about efficient use of our resources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    18 000 pounds of fuel? That's roughly 2250 gallons. At 30 miles per gallon, that's 67 500 miles one could travel. Just how many hybrids does this cancel out?

  3. The longest... by syukton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The longest...in length...

    As opposed to what, exactly? Isn't "longest" usually a relative measure of, uhm, length?

    Do you mean longest in terms of distance or duration? I'm fairly certain you ment distance, but you were totally ambiguous in the posting even though you made an attempt to clarify parenthetically.

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  4. Re:It's the longest (in length) by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Longest" can also very easily mean in time. You always hear people talking about how "long" movies are, that someone's been around a company "longer" than another person, etc.

    The disambiguation was completely necessary.