Slashdot Mirror


Quad Core Chips From Intel and AMD

lubricated writes "According to the San Fransisco Chronicle, in an effort to one-up AMD, Intel will be coming out with 4 core cpu's in 2007." From the article: "Chips with two cores have been the latest rage, with both Intel and AMD selling those microprocessors as their high-end offering. Apple Computer Inc.'s new iMac, which started selling last month, uses the dual-core chip ... Not to be outdone, Randy Allen, AMD's corporate vice president of server and workstation division, said Friday that his firm is working its own quad-core processor for release next year."

13 of 412 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Multi-cores by keyrat+rafa · · Score: 5, Funny
    I have an athlon 64 dual core 3800 using windows for my main ebay computer and it can pretty much handle anything i throw at it.

    wtf is an ebay computer and why would it need a fast processor?
  2. It's like razorblades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This time next year, we'll have 16 core CPU's from AMD to go along with our 16 blade razors from Gillette.

    1. Re:It's like razorblades by digitaleden · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's spelt grammar.

  3. In othe news... by dcapel · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...scientists report global warming is predicted to increase four-fold by 2008.

    --
    DYWYPI?
  4. In other news by Burning1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news:

    Not to be outdone by AMD, Gellete releases a 5 core Razor.

  5. Vista by BradWarden · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is this the min required for vista?

  6. Race is already over by Midnight+Warrior · · Score: 2, Funny

    This multi-core race is already over. Sony wins by default with the PS3 coming in with 7 cores (#8 is a ghost to cover over manufacturing flaws and defect counts). And everyone is whining about how to code for 7 cores. Having four cores won't change this single-threaded world. When the libraries of the world are suddenly multi-threaded, the PS3 will be light years ahead. Plus, IBM is going to be putting their Cell processors on blades. IBM and AMD are two years too late to the game.

  7. Adapted from the Onion by amliebsch · · Score: 5, Funny
    Fuck Everything, We're Doing Four Cores

    By Craig Barrett
    CEO and President,
    Intel
    February 10, 2006

    Would someone tell me how this happened? We were the fucking vanguard of computing in this country. The Pentium 3 was the CPU to own. Then the other guy came out with a 64-bit x86 CPU. Were we scared? Hell, no. Because we hit back with a little thing called the Itanium. That's 64 bit and a new instruction set. For performance. But you know what happened next? Shut up, I'm telling you what happened--the bastards went to two cores. Now we're standing around with our cocks in our hands, selling 64 bits and a new instruction set. Floating point performance or no, suddenly we're the chumps. Well, fuck it. We're going to four cores.

    Sure, we could go to two cores next, like the competition. That seems like the logical thing to do. After all, one worked out pretty well, and two is the next number after one. So let's play it safe. Let's make a faster bus and call it the Pentium4SuperExtreme. Why innovate when we can follow? Oh, I know why: Because we're a business, that's why!

    You think it's crazy? It is crazy. But I don't give a shit. From now on, we're the ones who have the edge in the multi-core game. Are they what's inside? Fuck, no. Intel is what's inside.

    What part of this don't you understand? If one core is good, and two cores is better, obviously four cores would make us the best fucking CPU that ever existed. Comprende? We didn't claw our way to the top of the processor game by clinging to the 64-bit industry standard. We got here by taking chances. Well, four cores is the biggest chance of all.

    Here's the report from Engineering. Someone put it in the bathroom: I want to wipe my ass with it. They don't tell me what to invent--I tell them. And I'm telling them to stick two more cores in there. I don't care how. Make the wafers so thin they're invisible. Put some on the bottom of the die. I don't care if they have to cram the fourth in perpendicular to the other three, just do it!

    You're taking the "point" part of "floating point" too literally, grandma. Cut the strings and soar. Let's hit it. Let's roll. This is our chance to make CPU history. Let's dream big. All you have to do is say that four cores can happen, and it will happen. If you aren't on board, then fuck you. And if you're on the board, then fuck you and your father. Hey, if I'm the only one who'll take risks, I'm sure as hell happy to hog all the glory when the four-core CPU becomes the computing tool for the U.S. of "this is how we compute now" A.

    People said we couldn't go to 64-bit. It'll cost a fortune to manufacture, they said. Well, we did it. Now some egghead in a lab is screaming "Four's crazy?" Well, perhaps he'd be more comfortable in the labs at AMD, working on fucking Turions. HyperTransport, my white ass!

    Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe we should just ride in Motorola's wake and make embedded IC's. Ha! Not on your fucking life! The day I shadow a penny-ante outfit like Motorola is the day I leave the CPU game for good, and that won't happen until the day I die!

    The market? Listen, we make the market. All we have to do is put her out there with a little jingle. It's as easy as, "Hey, gaming with anything less than four blades is like playing at VGA resolution." Or "You'll be so l33t, I couldn't snipe you with an aimbot." Try "Your b0x is going to be so friggin' fast, someone's gonna walk up and put a goddamn spoiler on it."

    I know what you're thinking now: What'll people say? Mew mew mew. Oh, no, what will people say?! Grow the fuck up. When you're on top, people talk. That's the price you pay for being on top. Which Intel is, always has been, and forever shall be, Amen, four cores, sweet Jesus in heaven.

    Stop. I just had a stroke of genius. Are you ready? Open your mouth, baby birds, cause Mama's about to drop you one sweet, fat nightcrawler. Here she comes: Put another Level 2 cache on that fucker, too. That's right. Four cores, two caches, and make th

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  8. Discussion by year 2342 by elbonian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude one: I've bought a laptop with the new Intel FGHI 3xyz! Dude two: What does it have? Dude one: 3Gc (Gigacores) Dude two: Man! That is awesome! I'm gonna buy one of these. What power does it need? Dude one: A portable nuclear plant model NUKE32 or better.

  9. Re:When will Microsoft change its license? by Deluge · · Score: 2, Funny

    As we begin to see 4-core and 8-core CPUs, how long will it be until Microsoft begins charging per core?

    Ah, but why would they? They'll just bloat the OS so it eats up enough CPU to require a multi-multicore chip setup for serious server performance.

  10. Obligatory... by jheath314 · · Score: 3, Funny

    64 processors should be enough for anyone

    --
    Procrastination Man strikes again!
  11. Re:Multi-cores by Daniel+Rutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Either
    (a) he's running a truly awesome amount of auction management and/or sniping software for a whole bunch of auctions, or
    (b) he's running eBay.

  12. Last email of Randy Allen leaked by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mr. President, we must not allow a Quad-Core gap!!"