Slashdot Mirror


Canadians To Douse Chinese Firewall

FrenchyinOntario writes "Researchers at a University of Toronto lab are getting ready to release a computer program called Psiphon, which will allow Internet users in free countries to help users in more restrictive countries (like China, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, etc.) to access the Internet by getting past the firewalls and getting around "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" which is a drawback of other anti-firewall programs as it reveals a user's tracks if discovered by authorities. Operating through port 443, Psiphon will allow users in monitoring countries the ability to send an encrypted request for certain information, and for users in secure countries to send it back to them. The UofT's Citizen Lab hopes to debut Psiphon at the international congress of the free speech group PEN in May."

16 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. Six/Four? by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Informative

    This has already been done: Six/Four

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  2. Re:Canada... by i_should_be_working · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except that the CRTC has nothing to do with what I can and can't view on the 'net.

  3. Re:A HTTP Proxy with SSL? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2, Informative

    As far as I know, with tor, you don't have to trust a specific machine

    They claim it is a feature - that you have to have a relationship - like an immigrated family member - with the owner of the system. That should reduce abusive uses to about zero, which should make it a lot more palatable for regular people to run, and a lot simpler, than an onion router system.

  4. Re:Opressive Country to-do list by scenestar · · Score: 5, Informative

    An elegant wrinkle is that the data will enter users' machines through computer port 443. Relied on for the secure transfer of data, this port is the one through whichreams of financial data stream constantly around the world.

    "Unless a country wanted to cut off all connections for any financial transactions they wouldn't be able to cut off these transmissions," said Professor Ronald Deibert, the director of Citizen Lab.


    rtfa kthnx

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
  5. They already have a program that does this by Veovis · · Score: 2, Informative

    and its available at http://www.peacefire.org/

  6. Can you say "open Proxy"? by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    My complaint with this scheme, and Tor, is that they are essentially open proxies. Anyone who has ever had the misfortune to pooch the acl lines on a Squid and leave it running a bit will know what happens next. One day you notice your bandwidth pegged at max and you scramble to fix it.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  7. Peekabooty by bitspotter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Peek-a-booty is also aimed at helping those in speech-embattled nations avoid censoring firewalls.

  8. Re:international meddling, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    But it's not the government that's doing it. U of T doesn't take it's marching orders from Ottawa

  9. This is different from a public anonymizing proxy by ikioi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Many people are asking, "How is this any better than somesite.com, a normal anonymizing proxy?"
    The difference is that this is a piece of software which runs on an individual person's computer.
    This is more like peer-to-peer than it is like 50,000 people using a well know proxy.

    The Chinese government can easily go to google and search for well known anonymizing proxies
    and block access to them. What the govt can't do, is find out every IP address on the internet
    running this software and block it. The downside of this software is that Chinese users must have
    a friend on the outside to run the software, but the upside is that it's vastly less likely that the
    Chinese government will be capable of blocking access to it.

  10. RTFA by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
    The US government,...should spend a little more time focusing on their own country and leave things like this alone.... is just not what good governments should be doing. The kind of governmental intrusion you are calling for is why the US is so hated east of the mediteranian.

    It's not a government initiative, and it's in Canada, not the US.

  11. Obligatory definition by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Help us build a better map!
  12. Re:A HTTP Proxy with SSL? by chato · · Score: 4, Informative
    ... in the case of China, I believe that you need to trust that the first node is legit
    It doesn't matter if the first node is not legit. First, you can deny that you originated the traffic, as you can be relying packets for other Tor nodes. Second, the route changes every 10 minutes.

    China's internet censorship works at several levels. It includes content-based filtering (banned terms in the text of what you are sending, including "human rights", "democracy" and "Dalai Lama"), so any attempt to bypass the filtering has to be encrypted. It also includes DNS-based filtering so some DNS lookups return the wrong IP addresses, and of course it also includes IP-based filtering that prevent Chinese users from accessing the BBC or Wikipedia, for instance.

    Tor can be very effective at bypassing most of these protections, and you can choose to run it on port 443 (https) to avoid port-based filtering. Also, you can limit the amount of bandwidth you want to donate to other nodes, and the default outgoing policy prevents connections to port 25 so you can't use a Tor node for sending spam.

    On the client side, using SwitchProxy for FireFox is helpful to maintain a list of proxies, including a local Tor instance, that works as a SOCKS proxy, and a list of open proxies (SwitchProxy can automatically change proxy every X seconds).
  13. Re:Tor: Not the answer. by aminorex · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can use a Tor node as a proxy. I do it all day every day. I didn't install anything on my computer, I just set the proxy.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  14. Re:Yes they willl. But there is hope. by aminorex · · Score: 2, Informative

    In my experience, having attempted to send CDs to China repeatedly, by postal mail, nothing gets in, regardless of content.

    Fedex might do better, I don't know, but their service area is limited to a few major metropolitan zones, and cost is imposing.

    I think illegal smuggling is probably the most reliable and cost-effective way to ship data into China by sneakernet. Hand off to a friend at the airport, whatever.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  15. Re:Yes they willl. But there is hope. by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to live in China, and shipping CDs to and from was impossible as customs agents would confiscate them. I was living in Guangdong province at the time.

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  16. Re:international meddling, eh? by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, where does one begin? Well, I imagine most people would argue that free speech is a basic human right; it's certainly included in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, which China itself signed up to:

    http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html

    "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

    It doesn't appear to mention drug or guns in there. (Or indeed, titties and/or beer).

    P.