Slashdot Mirror
MS Unveils Office 2007, Multiple Versions
rfunches writes "MSNBC reports that Microsoft's next version of Office, now known as Office 2007 (previously code-named Office 12), will continue targeting the corporate audience through multiple versions of Office 2007. Versions announced include 'Office Professional Plus 2007' and 'Office Enterprise 2007.' From the article: '[Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2007] will integrate capabilities of SharePoint, a collaboration program and Web portal that is designed to run over corporate networks and the Internet...and also incorporate Microsoft Office Communicator, a corporate instant messaging service.'"
http://www.abisource.com/
Religion for nerds. Stuff that really matters
Ahem...
Google Search for Open Source word Processor
Abiword for the lazy that does not want to look further.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
The article fails to mention that FrontPage will become SharePoint Designer in Office 2007.
The thing is that unix names generally tell you what the function is;
grep = general regular expresssion parser
cat = concatenate
vi = (the odd one our here) The name comes from the shortest unambiguous abbreviation for the command visual in ex
Office Plus & Office Enterprise really do not offer any clue to the differences by reading the name. Microsoft is missing the naming plot, wtf is "Windows Defender" I prefer "Microsoft Anti-Spyware" atleast now I know what it is defending against.
one what? A database?
Surely you jest. Access is not the best solution out there--it is horrible to use, the interface just blows, and it doesn't do a lot of what it should do. For the record OOBase Sucks as well.
Now that I have used MSSQL more, I am realizing the power of such a database. At work we are also getting ready to implement Crystal Reports, which makes the reporting components in Access look anemic and pathetic.
I am not a big MS fan, but I do think that they make a fine SQL server.
Folks, don't use Excel as a db, but access shouldn't be used either!
"We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
...Sarbanes Oxley
Companies need to keep logs of pretty much everything these days. Plus with having a system running in-house you can firewall off other IM services and not worry about employees using IM for non-work uses.
Finally (as mentioned elsewhere in this thread) it integrates perfectly into you existing outlook/exchange server directory.
I am NaN
All recent versions of Microsoft Access are able to actually use the desktop version of SQL server instead of the old JET-based engine.
Look up "access data project" in the Access help file. You can make it the default DB type, and most features of the "real" SQL Server are available (except the GUI management tools).
1st course they send you on is for Word.
2nd course is Excel
3rd...
Well, most people from the older generation don't get to go on course #3. They struggle with the first two applications; learning a 3rd isn't going to happen any time soon. It would be a complete waste of resources.
Even if they needed a proper database (with GUI) for their day to day work, the database is unlikely to be written by them anyway. That's a job for the *cough* experts.
I know SQL, I know Access, I know a little more than average. I would still use Excel for a simple database though. I would use it because everyone I work with knows how to use Excel to some degree. If I need to show someone how to write a Query in order to plant some data in their Word document then I'll show them how in Excel. Excel's not alien to them. They can grasp one extra function or dialog quite quickly. They can make changes if I happen to die too.
SQL server is kind of pointless when all you want to do is list people's names, ages and addresses.
This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
I am probably one of the biggest Linux Fanboys out there, I am not afraid to admit it. And I love to bash on MS.
But when I get serious and talk "right tool for the right job" I would heartily disagree with your feelings about Access.
I began my career in IT on Access (V. 1.1, Win 3). I've loved it ever since. I write all sorts of automation solutions for our company in Access. We use Great Plains and I've saved the company thousands of dollars by creating little, even somewhat crappy, automation routines in Access instead of buying some bloated module for GP that does way more then we need it to. It's quick, easy and gets the job done.
Access and ODBC let me connect to any database I want. I have our web site scp a snapshot of our MySQL databases to a local test copy of the web site. And I use Access to connect to it and run quick & dirty reports and queries. You like SQL Server but Access is not a substitute for MSSQL, it's a compliment to it. You can connect to SQL using Access. I tend to start my projects first in Access so I can carry it around with me while I develop it. When I feel the project is ready for a first release it is very easy to upload all my tables, data and queries to SQL Server and simply link in the new tables. No need to change my forms, reports or code because the linked tables are named the same, they just reside in a more robust and scalable database now that they are deployed.
Access's interface does take some getting used to and VBA is not a Real(TM) programming language but the beauty of VBA is, if you don't like the Access interface, change it using VBA. When I finish an automation solution that keeps some poor SOB in my company from typing the same data into our systems day in and day out the interface he/she uses is far different then that of standard Access.
Bottom line is, it's all about using the right tool for the job and for the small company I work for Access is the right tool in some very key situations.
P.S. I realize there are 100's, if not 1000's of other solutions that do similar things to what I describe above. My company owned Access and MSSQL so that and my familiarity with Access led to my choice.
Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
The Achilles heel for OpenOffice is the documentation. MS Office's Help files are pretty superb, and there is no similarly comprehensive, easy to use documentation for OpenOffice.
Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
I work in a large company that has many locations throughout the world. We use Sametime like crazy. It has screensharing functionality too. That's used a lot on conference calls cause anyone can share their screen and you can give control to other people to your own.