Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Vista Info Leaked

slashnutt writes to tell us Yahoo News is reporting that Microsoft accidentally released information about Windows Vista earlier than originally planned. From the article: "Microsoft disclosed information about a plan to release eight different editions of the new operating system on a company help page that was under development. The company has not made any official statements about the different versions of Windows Vista it plans to offer. The company has since taken down the Web site and declined to confirm the information and said it will offer more details about the Vista launch, targeted for the second half of 2006, in the coming weeks. Microsoft spokesman said in a statement 'This page has since been removed as it was posted prematurely and was for testing purposes only.'"

4 of 476 comments (clear)

  1. Old news by posterlogo · · Score: 5, Informative
    This was revealed days ago in an Engadget entry that was much more informative:
    http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/19/which-windows-v ista-will-you-run-you-have-8-choices/

    "Windows Starter 2007 - Vista without Aero, probably meant for developing nations.

    Windows Vista Home Basic - Basic Windows Vista for your single PC fam, doesn't sound like much going on here. Analagous to XP Home.

    Windows Vista Home Basic N - European version of the same, but without Media Player (because of antitrust rulings against MS in the EU).

    Windows Vista Home Premium - This is the one we're all probably gonna own. It's got Media Center functionality, Cable Card support, the whole home-media shebang.

    Windows Vista Business - Think of it as XP Pro, but Vista.

    Windows Vista Business N - Think of it as XP Pro, but Vista, but Euro.

    Windows Vista Enterprise - Business version of Vista with numerous enterprise features, like Virtual PC, volume encryption, etc.

    Windows Vista Ultimate - Love that name. This one does all of the above (and more); what else do you need to know? It's ultimate Windows.."

    More choices are rarely a bad idea. I dislike bundled crapola that I'll never need or want.

  2. Re:Enough Choice To Choke A Horse by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

    Where did you get that list? According to Neowin's recent news, it's more like this:
    - Windows Starter 2007
    - Windows Vista Home Basic
    - Windows Vista Home Basic N
    - Windows Vista Home Premium
    - Windows Vista Business
    - Windows Vista Business N
    - Windows Vista Ultimate
    - Windows Vista Enterprise

    No Basic/Premium of Business, and there's no "Corporate" listed there.

    Anyway, it's still 8. :-) And I agree it's too many. It confuses more than it clarifies. When Joe User gets to decide, is he a Basic or Premium home user? Do a company need a Business edition or an Enterprise edition? The problem seem to be that you need to study feature lists and compare to know for sure what you need. I'd rather see just a Home vs Pro vs Ultimate (being the Home + Pro merge). Three editions (or more if you count N editions which Microsoft must do).

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  3. Re:Hey, its better than Linux by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 5, Informative
    At least I can try most of the various versions of Linux without having to pay $400 a pop.

    And, once I have a version I like. I don't have to fork out another $400 just because I decide to upgrade my motherboard.

    And a lot of the so-called 4000 versions of Linux are specific versions that people have built for their preferred application. An example would be my netboot CD that allows net-booting Knoppix from a CD -- which I designed so that I can give students in a classroom their own Linux box (without touching their hard drives), and also a way to do semi-automated backups and restore for public Windows boxes.
    That's something that I (as a hobbyist) could never create with Windows (much less distribute).

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  4. Re:Hey, its better than Linux by Gulthek · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, it isn't true. "Linux" is the kernel, which is now available in two versions: 2.4 and 2.6 (and all prior versions of course). There are many distributions, but they all use one of those two kernels.