Slashdot Mirror


The World Oceans Now 70% Shark Free

wheresjim writes "According to a study published in The Proceedings of The Royal Society, the world's oceans are now about 70% shark free. This is a bad sign for the sharks, the oceans and of course, journalists during slow news cycles."

10 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. /. response. by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing for you to see here, please move along

    70% appropriate.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  2. Either you're with us you're with the sharks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am shocked to hear this kind of pro-shark fascism being spewed on Slashdot. As we all know, sharks are vile, evil creatures who are a danger and threat to all life and liberty.

    Why do you hate America?

  3. The other 30% by yobjob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are circling around Australian beaches.

    1. Re:The other 30% by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nope, they went to law-school.

    2. Re:The other 30% by jaymz168 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or are delivering candygrams.

  4. By volume? by Toba82 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean that the ocean is 30% sharks by volume? I AM NEVER SWIMMING AGAIN!

    --
    I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
  5. Batman! by broothal · · Score: 5, Funny

    I blame Batman for dumping his anti-shark-spray into the ocean.

    (if you get that joke you're really old)

  6. Re:Bad for all of us by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sure, but what about the poor Austrian fishermen? Why aren't you taking them into consideration with your "facts"?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  7. Re:Bad for all of us by tomrud · · Score: 5, Funny
    > Sure, but what about the poor Austrian fishermen? Why aren't you taking them into consideration with your "facts"?

    We should encurage them to get new jobs. In the Austrian Navy for example.

    --
    For a nice date: Call strftime(3C)!
  8. oblig. fortune by arabagast · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... So the documentary-makers stick with sharks. Generally, their
    procedure is to scatter bleeding fish pieces around their boat, so as
    to infest the waters. I would estimate that the primary food source of
    sharks today is bleeding fish pieces scattered by people making
    documentaries. Once the sharks arrive, they are generally fairly
    listless. The general shark attitude seems to be: "Oh God, another
    documentary." So the divers have to somehow goad them into attacking,
    under the guise of Scientific Research. "We know very little about the
    effect of electricity on sharks," the narrator will say, in a deeply
    scientific voice. "That is why Todd is going to jab this Great White
    in the testicles with a cattle prod." The divers keep this kind of
    thing up until the shark finally gets irritated and snaps at them, and
    then they act as though this was a totally unexpected and very
    dangerous development, although clearly it is what they wanted all
    along.
                                    -- Dave Barry, "The Wonders of Sharks on TV"

    Seems like the documentary people has stopped feeding the sharks

    --
    Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
    Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.