Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Faces Fresh Antitrust Complaints

Rob wrote to mention a Computer Business Online review piece about new anti-trust action against Microsoft on both sides of the Atlantic. From the article: "Other examples of anticompetitive behavior cited by Tangent include bundling of Outlook with Office and Active Directory with Windows Server, as well as the bundling of Windows Media Player and Windows Media Server with its desktop and server operating system respectively. Microsoft did not respond to a request for comment on Tangent's complaint, other than to acknowledge that it was being reviewed, but was more forthcoming in responding to a fresh complaint lodged with the European Commission by the European Committee for Interoperable Systems (ECIS)."

5 of 429 comments (clear)

  1. Will buy time by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Informative
    I predict that even with this complaint, M$ will buy time if it turns into a suit. This buying of time has worked well for M$ in the past. They (M$) will require clarifications, will complain and submit incomplete information as time goes by. By the time any verdict is made, it will have no teeth!

    Remember we started the present suit against M$ in 2001...5 years later we see no change!

  2. Re:media player by creepynut · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Internet Explorer licence states that you must have a licence to Windows in order to run it. Meaning, you can download IE and install it on Linux, but according to the licence, it's not legal.

    NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A VALID EULA FOR ANY "OS PRODUCT" (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, MICROSOFT WINDOWS 98, MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT 4.0, MICROSOFT WINDOWS 2000, MICROSOFT MILLENNIUM EDITION, MICROSOFT WINDOWS XP, OR ANY OTHER MICROSOFT OPERATING SYSTEM THAT IS A SUCCESSOR TO ANY OF THE FOREGOING OPERATING SYSTEMS) YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO INSTALL, COPY, OR OTHERWISE USE THE OS COMPONENTS AND YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS UNDER THIS SUPPLEMENTAL EULA.

    Unfortunately, I don't have a link to this, I just copy and pasted from the IE6 Installer. I imagine Windows Media Player has something similar.

  3. Re:media player by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ubuntu Linux comes with these applications; uninstalling them removes the 'ubuntu-desktop' meta-package. Subsiquently, upgrading to the next release of Ubuntu without having 'ubuntu-desktop' installed breaks Ubuntu.

    I just spent quite a few attacks at them chiding them for poor behavior packaging the ubuntu-desktop seed with python bindings and development tools not used by any visible user applications. This was out of scope for what they describe on their site; and removing it would remove the desktop seed, breaking upgrades of the OS.

    At no point , however, did I threaten to sue them for what they were doing, or even imply that they didn't have a right to do it; my only arguments were that it was immature and out of scope for their project, and that they seemed to be trying to keep people from finding out about all the extra bloat—mainly by only mentioning it on one very obscure, short, and burried FAQ entry instead of blatantly stating, "And Ubuntu comes with a full set of Python development tools out of the box," on the main page.

    It has been said that the reason Python tools are included with Ubuntu but not C or C++ tools is that "Ubuntu wants to encourage Python development" and "when the user goes to pick a language to use, Python will already be there and ready, so they'll use that." Nobody has tried to sue Canonical. You still have the choice NOT TO USE IT, even if not NOT TO HAVE IT.

  4. Re:media player by Isotopian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, the WMV format is far superior to QT when it comes to properly compressing them to a low bitrate. I go out of my way to avoid installing QT (which is very difficult to get without iTunes bundled, isn't that more 'unfair bundling'?) because I don't like it as a player or as a format. Not to say it's bad, it's just not the best.

    --

    It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

  5. Re:media player by brandonbradley · · Score: 3, Informative
    There have been no significant changes to video players since Microsoft arrived on the market. The only company doing innovation in that area is Apple with their Quicktime product and their support of the Sorenson codecs.
    Actually there have been improvements both with the Sorrenson codec as well as the MP4 format. xVid and Divx also come to mind as improvements in that quality of video has improved while comparative file size has decreased. Then there are the new video capabilities of the flash player which can now not only play, record, and stream video, but can also do things like utilize alpha channels to blend with non video content. So innovation is still out there and happening, even if it isn't necessarily evident to most.