Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Draft Rules for X Prize Lunar Lander Challenge

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the little-tougher-this-time dept.

IZ Reloaded writes "X Prize Foundation is asking the public to comment on the draft rules set for its lunar lander challenge. From Space.com: According to draft rules for the lunar lander contest, competitors will be challenged to build a vehicle capable of launching vertically, travel a distance of 328 to 656 feet (100 to 200 meters) horizontally, and then land at a designated site. A return trip would then occur between 5 minutes and 30 minutes later...Comments are sought by March 1 with initial sign-ups slated for May 15, according to draft rules, though Murphy added that the comment period could be extended to 30 days."

3 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Link to the rules, not a story about them. by temojen · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case anyone actually wants to comment.

  2. Re:Here's a Solution by Michael+Duggan · · Score: 3, Informative

    : By the summary, it sounds like a Helicopter could win this.

    3.2.18.1 Take-off vertically under only rocket power from Point A. No aerodynamic or air-breathing methods of hovering, propulsion, or landing are permitted except in the case of abort.

  3. Re:My Comment: by yeremein · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sure, the RACE to the moon was full of innovation, but other than really proving it wasn't made of cheese, it was a more colossal waste of cash than both Gulf Wars put together!

    The cost of the Apollo program was $135 billion in 2005 dollars.

    George Sr.'s Gulf war cost $61 billion. The cost of the current Iraq war is in excess of $240 billion and rising. Apollo didn't even come close.