iTunes, One Billion Suckers Served?
Thomas Hawk writes "Apple is out hyping their one billionth iTunes download today, but is building your music library in a format that could be obsolete in the future really the best strategy? Will the consumer once again have to someday replace their iTunes track just like they had to replace their LP, cassette, and CD only to get their music on their hot new non Apple mp3 phone of the future? "
http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/24/ 0617244
(damn lame time filter...)
... only homos pay for what they can easily get for free. complete internalization of arbitrary social mores with no room for revision or improvisation. I'd never buy anything that I can easily get for free with little fear of recrimination. It's just stupid. My music collection is great and timeless. If they want me to pay for music - make sure I can't get it anywhere else for free.
That goes for you too, Hollywood. You can pry bit torrent from my cold dead fingers!
un burrito me trampeó.
My wife is in a belly-dance troupe and they rehearse at our house. Each week she burns a CD of the night's dance music and puts in into the little stereo in the rehearsal room because the speakers are loud enough for the dance practice, and the buttons for replay, advance, etc. are easy to use. But last night the computer refused to make the CD. It said she had already burned seven CDs with a certain tune on them. She had purchased the album containing that tune at iTunes. 'Rented' might be a better term than purchased, I guess. Or maybe I should say that she was alowed to listen to it a few times, for her money.
Do I need to add that now she is even less thrilled with the idea of getting her music online?