Slashdot Mirror
Professor 'Packetslinger' Assigns Questionable Task
mrowton writes "A professor at an undisclosed university recently assigned a practical for his computer-security class. The practical, which is worth 15 percent of the students final grade, requires students to perform reconnaissance on an internet server using tools available in the public domain. While the university is allowing the practical to continue it has also stated that the techniques should not be performed on their own web servers. If students are caught performing any scans against university computers then it would prompt: "Disabling their student account and referring them to the Student Dean of Corrections." The assignment was enough for SANS to dub him 'Professor Packetslinger of the School of Loose Screws.'"
He's not supplying his own honeypot servers, and didn't get the University to allow use of campus servers either? I'd think he could sell it to the IT group as a hardening exercise, since students would have to do full disclosure to get credit anyway.
Yup, just goes to show you that "smart" and "fool" aren't antonyms.
Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
Hell, set up some kind of a honeynet with several types of servers (Windows, Mac, *nix) in various states of security. There's absolutely no reason to make these students scan actual production servers. By using custom built servers, the professor will have more control over the lesson, and will be able to tell what the students are actually doing.
- None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
If I notice someone poking around at my systems in such a way that looks like it's looking for exploits, I'll contact the ISP responsable and ask them to chave a chat with that user. If they blow me off, I'm likely to blacklist the ISP entirely.
Just like with your house, while it might not technically be illegal for you to sit on public land and case my house out like you are going to break in to it, you can bet I'll object if you try.
The NSA issued a press release stating that its whole domestic spying operation was just part of a homework assignment.
A similiar occurance happened at my university (University of Delaware). When I was an undergraduate, I took the 400 level security class. The teacher isn't a professor, but he's a staffer who happens to be amazingly knowledgable about all areas of unix and networking)
The assignments were some of the most practical security assignments you could imagine. For one assignment, he gave us the location of a target machine, and told us to "break in and find something that would make people a lot of money". The trick was to scan it with Nmap across an obscene number of ports (he was running a compromised telnet server on some really high port - like 11,000), telnet in, and look through the files to find a fictitious email about a stock buyout. ("But make sure not to scan any machines besides the target machine!") In another one, we telnetted into a mail server he set up, and emailed the TA with a faked 'from' address. "If it looks fake, you lose points", so you had to make damn sure to get all the fields looking immaculate. Another assignment was he gave us an XOR encrypted message, and we had to crack it. (The trick was to look for large areas with spaces, which gave away the key)
It was, all in all, a great class. Just one problem - the IT people *hated* the class. He told us he got a complaint during the Nmap assignment that it had been used to run 150,000 scans on campus machines. The computer science department adamantly defended the assignments, as important learning tools. It's an important issue of academic freedom, and (last I had heard) the CS department's concerns trumped IT's complaint.
To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
--E.C. Stanton
Would be to have seperated the class into two teams with two networks and then have them secure their networks. Then launch attacks angainst one another. This way they see both the way attacks are made along with how to protect their network from them.
A bunch of Tech Stuff
How would you teach security if not by trying out the attack tools?
I don't see what the hoopla is about here. He asked them to do a scan, not open them up and format the hard disk or download files on it.
Maybe his next assignment is the ethics. Maybe it's just a test to see if any of his students find this ethically wrong and refuse to do it. Maybe he would have given them extra points.
I run several servers on the Internet, and I get port scanned all the time. Even more so at home, where my dynamic DSL IP is hit by worms many times each day.
Dear American proto-hackers, you are welcome to come to Europe and learn the tools of your trade here. We meet every year between Christmas and New Year at the CCC Congress, and we have a LAN there, so people can get acquainted with the tools.
Its a bit like open source software.. The information is public, what problems are there by students looking at it. As long as the dont actually compromise anything, they could be helping it security.
In this case, I think the IT Staff are being idiots.
In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
The hyperbole displayed in this post is exactly the sort of behavior that computer security professionals should avoid engaging in. People who take undue offence at obviously innocent acts and run around making completely unfounded accusations of mal-intent and criminal liability are the sort of network operators who can make a workplace a living hell for people who are trying to get things done. Its a power trip and in a serious corporate environment it is totally inappropriate. Security professionals should be focused on real threats to business continuity rather then getting their rocks off by hunting down port scanners. It should be painfully obvious that nothing about this assignment is either illegal or immoral. The students are asked to perform a vulnerability assessment. They are asked to collect information; they are not asked to act on that information and break in. If you want to understand how security gets done it makes sense to take a look at someone who is doing it and see what they are doing. Its the kind of activity that might raise suspicion in the event that the intent was to use the information collected in the subsiquent commission of a crime, but that obviously isn't the intent here, so there is no REAL problem. If your Internet connected computer is so weak from a security standpoint that this kind of snooping is enough to impact your operation then I suggest you stop reading this and go check on it because you are probably offline right now. Obviously one needs to be careful in performing this sort of audit that one doesn't use aggressive tools that can impact the operation of a host, and students do need to understand the difference between collecting information and obtaining unauthorized access. It might make sense for this lesson to be bundled with a serious conversation about the ethical issues. Obviously, it would be preferable to ask students to look at a honeypot host rather then examining someone's live network, if for no other reason then this kind of probing is suspicious and, albeit EXTRMELY unlikely, could cause administrators to waste time investigating. However, to suggest that performing this kind of information collection against a remote host is a crime regardless of the intent of the exercise is, frankly, "just plain stupid and ignorant." Sans security ought to relax. The likelyhood that any of the targets of this exercise so much as noticed it is infinitesimal.
I don't care if you're talented. You have no idea how a scan is going to affect whatever applications I have running off of that pipe. What may not break one network may most certainly break another. You, with all your talent, can still make a mistake. I've had it happen to me and the reason why I was able to quickly recover was because I KNEW I WAS BEING SCANNED BEFOREHAND! Vendor comes in and says "Oh, this is going to be harmless." and surprise one little Nessus scan brings down half the unix farm until I unplug the laptop. If I really want you pen-testing my network then I'll bring you in as an intern. That way I know about and accept the risk I want to take instead of the unknown.
You make this bold, sweeping statement about security through obscurity but reread your quote. "You may" not "You will" The students do not have to turn in their work to the company they scanned so there is no way for that organization to take those findings and improve their system. If this was some big noble cause why didn't the prof contact some local businesses and have them agree to a pen-test in return for a report? The fact that the administration reserves the right to discipline any student that uses this assignment to scan the school's network speaks volumes. Your comment about admins who oppose this are ones who routinely port scan the school's network is a fallacy on so many levels that I simply chose to ignore it.
I don't care if the prof is going to cash his Nobel check and give the money to the starving poor in Africa. The assignment was ill conceived from the start. It wasn't professional or academic and there were viable alternatives other than going out into the wild and poking around people's perimeters without permission. What? Haven't heard of a test lab?
Absolutely nothing in your post has dissuaded me from the opinion that this entire issue was just plain dumb.
I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie