Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Investigating Sale of Snort as Security Risk

msmoriarty writes "The Associated Press is reporting today that the same U.S. committee that approved the Dubai ports deal is 'strongly objecting' to Israeli-based Check Point's acquisition of Snort's parent company, Sourcefire, because it doesn't want a foreign company to own Snort's underlying technology. According to the article, the broader 45-day review process rejected for the ports deal is already underway regarding this transaction, and 'secret' meetings between the FBI, DoD and Check Point have been held."

2 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. No. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This seems to be a really dumb move. Its basically telling the world that its ok for the US to take over foreign companies, but its not ok for foreign companies to take over a US business.

    It is a dumb move, but you're not making sense. Foreign companies buy controlling interests in US companies all the time. And the company Dubai Ports wants to buy is British owned anyway.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  2. Re:Anti Business Practices by whoever57 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    but its not ok for foreign companies to take over a US business.
    You do know that the company that is currently running the ports is British, don't you? You might remember Britain: that's where the shoe bomber came from! Britain's culture has allowed extremist muslim ideology to flourish there.
    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!