Slashdot Mirror


Alien Rain Over India

tintinaujapon writes "The Observer is reporting that scientists may have found the first evidence of panspermia, the idea promoted by Hoyle (among others) that life on earth was seeded from space, in samples of a strange rain which fell over India for two months in 2001. To quote the article: "There is a small bottle containing a red fluid on a shelf in Sheffield University's microbiology laboratory. The liquid looks cloudy and uninteresting. Yet, if one group of scientists is correct, the phial contains the first samples of extraterrestrial life isolated by researchers."" This is a continuation of a story two months back or so.

27 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. Or it could be by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An Invasion force ?

    1. Re:Or it could be by TangoCharlie · · Score: 5, Funny

      More likely to be some kind of alien biological weapon. Obviously, the aliens have
      read HG Wells' War of the Worlds and are making sure we get wiped out first. Of course,
      it's the Chickens they should be after. H5N1 is much bigger threat to alien life forms
      than the common cold.

      --
      return 0; }
    2. Re:Or it could be by bri2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Another similar theory (which I found quite amusing - while hastening to add that I am quite aware it is basically BS, has no evidence to support it and is not very credible) is that an alien race with an extremely long time horizon looks for planets which are capable of sustaining life (for the sake of argument say planets on which water is in liquid form), seeds them with bacteria or RNA strands or whatever then sits back for a couple of hundred million years while an ecosystem evolves so there's plenty for them to eat and hydro-carbons to use (for plastics if not fuel) when they get here. Obviously there's a risk that intellegent life will evolve and use all these resources before they arrive but if they've seeded plenty of planets this shouldn't be too much of a set-back for them. They just eliminate the infestation, leave things to recover and go somewhere else for now.

    3. Re:Or it could be by eno2001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Inefficiency is relative Earthman. I've met beings several eons old who have done this sort of thing before. To them, such a terraforming process would be similar to your informal time unit known as "fractions of a second". Do not fall into the trap of measuring the universe by your own perspective.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  2. Jupiter a better choice than Saturn in 2001 by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you've read the book, you'd know that the movie version of 2001 uses Jupiter rather than Saturn as described in the book. The more I watch it, the more it makes sense that Jupiter is the correct planet and Saturn just doesn't quite fit. If you look at the space ship (the one with HAL and Dave), it looks like a single sperm and it's flying towards the giant egg Jupiter. We humans are performing panspermia right in our own solar system!

    It's pretty fucking deep, and if you're on mushrooms, the hour long warp scene makes total sense.

    But realistically, if we can pollinate other planets with our germs, then it seems more than likely that other planets could eject matter which eventually cross pollinates with us. The question is whether something like that could survive in the harsh radiation of space. There are obviously some bacteria that could make the trip, but how common are these extremophiles? Probably not as extreme as sending up a sperm ship to penetrate Jupiter's Big Red Dot and impregnate it with our space baby.

    1. Re:Jupiter a better choice than Saturn in 2001 by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The question is whether something like that could survive in the harsh radiation of space.

      Apollo 12 landed near the Surveyor probe, which had landed a few years previously. The astronauts broke off a section and returned it to Earth. It was then found that bacteria had survived on Surveyor, on the Moon, in spore form - and once returned, came back to life and started replicating again.

      I've also read lately (I believe it was in the current New Scientist) that an experiment on bacteria was sent up on Columbia. On being recovered, it turned out that the three cultures that were intended to be in there had all been killed off by the heat of reentry - but that a contaminant strain had survived and thrived inside the unbroken sealed container.

      Bacteria are tough, and we can assume that anything leaving Earth is infested with them.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Jupiter a better choice than Saturn in 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "if you're on mushrooms, the hour long warp scene makes total sense"

      ...and if you're not on mushrooms, it's only 5 minutes long!

    3. Re:Jupiter a better choice than Saturn in 2001 by m0nstr42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On being recovered, it turned out that the three cultures that were intended to be in there had all been killed off by the heat of reentry - but that a contaminant strain had survived and thrived inside the unbroken sealed container.

      That's an important point, though. In both of those cases, whatever lived was shielded during re-entry. A spore on an asteroid or other "natural" projectile would experience similar (worse, probably) extremes and it seems less and less likely they could survive "re-entry" (entry, rather?). Could a lone bacteria/spore/whatever that was just "floating" on its own through space survive entry into the atmosphere without being burned up?

      My guess (IANA cosmologist) is that after a long journey through space it would have been accellerated to great speed by passing nearby massive objects, so despite not having much mass the friction would still be pretty intense.

    4. Re:Jupiter a better choice than Saturn in 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      In practice small objects don't tend to do reentry like larger objects. The differance is mainly in that they don't resist deceleration so much having a much larger surface area then mass, this leads to them gently floating down the atmosphere. If I remember correctly very fine dust enters the planet constantly, never burning up cause it just isn't heavy enough to suffer that fate.

  3. Very impressive by endrue · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is a small bottle containing a red fluid on a shelf in Sheffield University's microbiology laboratory.

    Is that like a ship in a bottle?

    --
    I meta-moderate because I care.
  4. According to the current New Scientist... by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ... this may actually be blood. The particles do look quite like red blood cells, and that would explain the lack of DNA found in them.

    It's almost as outlandish as 'the meteor was full of alien bugs', though; what we seem to have with this hypothesis was 'the meteor burst in the middle of a flock of bats and liquidised them'...

    No link, the website article is subscription-only. Sorry.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  5. Alien rain? Riiiiiiight. by Stephen+H-B · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good thing my tinfoil hat is waterproof. Let's see those alien rain bugs infest my brain now!

    --
    Sick of WoW? Try the thinking man's MMORPG: EVE Online
  6. One big problem by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the article:

    But Godfrey Louis, a physicist at Mahatma Gandhi University in Kottayam, after gathering samples left over from the rains, concluded this was nonsense.

    He didn't collect uncontaminated samples. He collected samples that had, apparently, collected in puddles. Depending on where those puddles were, ground, steel barrel, rooftop, squeezed from a soaked shirt, etc, they were not the same as putting out a clean jar and collecting the rain as it fell.

    It would be nice if these samples had been collected in the correct manner then a more convincing argument could be made that what was found came from space and was not of terrestrial origins.

    This is like people who have cancer, undergo treatment for a while then stop. Then they resort to prayer to cure them. If they're cured they claim it was the prayer that did the work. However, since they had already undergone treatment, we can't say for sure which helped the person. The results are contaminated by their original treatment.

    Same thing in this instance.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:One big problem by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

      It would be nice if these samples had been collected in the correct manner

      You see people, this is why I've set up a petition to fund an army of scientists which will be deployed at one-meter intervals to cover the entire earth! In case anything interresting ever happens, we'll have qualified people with the right equipment right there to take samples and measurments.

      And they said I was being unrealistic... the FOOLS!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  7. Questions by LS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. How could a single meteor/comet cause _two months_ of red rain?
    2. Why the crys of "bullshit" from other researchers? There is a piece of evidence, not just a claim. It seems easy to figure out what's going on by analyzing the contents of that bottle.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  8. Alien? by jav1231 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We know this because we've discovered everything on Earth already. We ran this through our big database of shit on Earth thingy and it came up negative.

  9. Sounds impressive by Centurix · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I keep 'vials' of amber fluid in my fridge that came down from the sky on a plane. Truly a gift from the Carlton United Brewery gods.

    --
    Task Mangler
  10. Re:In Soviet by oliverthered · · Score: 4, Funny

    Common, at least try to try.
    In Soviet Russia aliens reign over you!

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  11. Bullshit. by TangoCharlie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My favourite quote from the article is

    Not everyone is convinced by the idea, of course. Indeed most researchers think it is highly dubious. One scientist who posted a message on Louis's website described it as 'bullshit'.

    The slashdot posting would almost have you believe that Aliens had actually landed. Sheesh!

    --
    return 0; }
  12. Peter Gabriel is an alien by bjb · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Hmm.. after seeing images of the guy during his "makeup years" (1972-early 80's), this now make sense:

    Peter Gabriel -- "Red Rain"
    Red rain is coming down
    Red rain, Red rain is pouring down
    Pouring down all over me

    I am standing up at the water's edge in my dream
    I cannot make a single sound as you scream
    It can't be that cold, the ground is still warm to touch
    This place is so quiet, sensing that storm

    Red rain is coming down
    Red rain, Red rain is pouring down
    Pouring down all over me

    Well I've seen them buried in a sheltered place in this town
    They tell you that this rain can sting, and look down
    The aliens have created life for us
    Hay ay ay no pain, Seeing no red at all, see no rain

    Red rain is coming down
    Red rain, Red rain is pouring down
    Pouring down all over me

    Red rain-
    There sprouts a human, o'er there a puppy
    To return again and again
    Just let the red rain splash you
    Let the rain fall on your skin
    It's like fertilizer, oh yeah
    To create a new child

    Red rain is coming down
    Red rain, Red rain is pouring down
    Pouring down all over me
    And I can't watch it yet
    No eye formed yet
    It's so hard to lay down in all of this
    Red rain is coming down
    Red rain is pouring down
    Red rain is coming down all over me
    I see it, Red rain is coming down
    Red rain is pouring down
    Red rain is coming down all over me
    I'm bathing in it, Red rain coming down
    Red rain is coming down
    Red rain is coming down all over me
    I'm begging you, Red rain coming down
    Red rain coming down
    Red rain coming down
    Red rain coming down
    Over me in the red red sea, Over me, Over me, Red rain

    (apologies to Mr. Gabriel)

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  13. Too bad the facts are so humdrum. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I *see*--- there's stuff that if his claims are true, would be the biggest news since I don't know when. But it's been sitting around for FIVE YEARS and not confirmed by anybody else. And apparently he hasnt given samples to other scientists. And it hasnt appeared on the front page of the NYT.

    One might surmise that the stuff is something more placid, like common earth dust, pollen, bee-poop, grasshopper-poop, or any number of other things of-this-Earth.

    A real scientist would have gone out of his way to compare the funny stuff to various earth items, in a good-faith effort to identify the stuff. Not just do batch analyses of the constituent elements. There's 1000's of things that might have that mix of elements and NOT be from off-planetary sources.

    1. Re:Too bad the facts are so humdrum. by Becquerel · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The story has got the front page of the NewScientist this week (no doubt where the origional interest started), a publication i trust far more than and newspaper. In that article the scientist makes the (previously unpublished) claim that:

      ...[if noone can prove what it is] someone will have to verify the observation that Louis [the scientist] made whicheven he finds astonishing: that the cells replicate. In earlier unpublished papers, Louis says he cultured the red rain cells in unconventional nutrients, such as cedar wood oil, and showed that these DNA devoid mcrobes divide happily at a temperature of 300oC. Louis admits he left these claims out of his latest paper because he thought they would be considered "too exaordinary"(NewScientist 4th March 2006)

      Non DNA based replication would seem like pretty good evidence for alien life.... if you believe him.

      His latest paper to be published in the respectable Astrophysics and Space Science Can be found here. Dr Godfrey Louis website, with a pic of the particles and mirrors to this paper and links to other papers, here

      --
      My spelling isn't bad, I'm evolving the language
  14. Blood Storm by LS · · Score: 3, Funny

    It appears that something similar occurred over Florida mid-December.

    Here's the article

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  15. New Scientist article by woodlouse_man · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Read this in New Scientist over the weekend. Link here (but you need to be a subscriber)

    http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/mg1892541 1.100

    Very interesting article, with several possible explanations.

    The most plausible, to my mind, is the mammalian red blood cells. They seem to be the right shape, and have no DNA (like the particles).

    As they said in the NS article, the question really remains is - if they are mamallian red blood cells, how did the clouds get seeded with them int he first place?

  16. Maybe God did it by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny
    If I've learned nothing else from the study of intelligent design; it's that, when in doubt, shrug your shoulders and say "Maybe my sky-god did it."

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  17. Link to Louis' original paper by Oxygen99 · · Score: 3, Informative

    No link to the New Scientist, but here's the paper written to support the original hypothesis:

    link

    --
    I had a dream, bright and carefree, but now there's doubt and gravity
  18. Possible Strange Earthlife More the Point by Rob+Carr · · Score: 3, Interesting
    New Scientist has a more extensive article titled Alien rain over India. The possible causes for 50 tons of the red gunk range from panspermia to sand to high flying bats killed by an exploding meteor. Somehow, I think panspermia is more likely than the bats, although that's not saying much.

    More interesting is the idea that "alien" life might originate on Earth. Modern techniques involve culturing and DNA analysis that assume standard DNA in an organism: adenine, thymine, guanine, and cytosine. Viruses can have RNA, but they're not considered alive (that's another argument for another day).

    There are other nucleic acids and other nucleic acid pairs. There might even be molecules that could polymerize and act as hereditary subunits. Such life wouldn't have to come from space. Standard theory taught that several kinds of life might have come from the prebiotic soup, but only one survived.

    We now know that's not exactly true. There are a few organisms that don't use the exact standard DNA code. The mitochondria in your cells are a perfect example, although they're no longer free-living independent organisms.

    What else is out there? The possibility that there is a parallel and intertwined ecosystem is becoming a hot topic in biology.

    Rains of frogs, seaweed, sand, and other things aren't uncommon. A rain of non-standard bacteria isn't beyond possibility. Of course, neither is a government experiment on deploying biological weapons, although 50 tons is a lot, whether English or Metric. A foul-up in the biochemistry or some weird damage to the DNA is still more likely. But wouldn't it be fun if it turned out to be Earthlife that's alien?

    --
    This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....