U.S. Satellite Programs in Jeopardy of Collapse

smooth wombat writes "A committee of the National Academy of Sciences, headed by Richard Anthens, has warned that 'the vitality of Earth science and application programs has been placed at substantial risk by a rapidly shrinking budget.' The list of Earth-observing satellite programs affected is a long one and includes satellite programs which observe nearly every aspect of Earth's climate. A delay in launching a replacement satellite or the disabling of a current satellite without a replacement could mean that data necessary to monitor or predict an upcoming event would be severely restricted. For its part NASA says that tight budgets force it to cut funding for all but the most vital programs. 'We simply cannot afford all of the missions that our scientific constituencies would like us to sponsor,' NASA administrator Michael Griffin told members of Congress when he testified before the House Science Committee February 16."

Comments

OUTGOING

[Anonymous Coward]

HELLO WORLD
91873 91873
HELLO WORLD
29494 29494 12424 12424 76800 76800 21909 21909 47323 47323
29009 29009 91320 91320 15044 15044 29399 29399 09652 09652
63393 63393 76296 76296 12203 12203 69686 69686 58454 58454
06981 06981 51449 51449 50442 50442 88956 88956 35866 35866
98516 98516 04610 04610 77629 77629 91265 91265 56199 56199
47676 47676 49911 49911 62670 62670 72188 72188 18812 18812
12325 12325 92036 92036 24916 24916 27669 27669 19867 19867
61825 61825 26194 26194 48091 48091 55752 55752 58577 58577
95506 95506 44159 44159 93641 93641 98528 98528 01930 01930
64880 64880 46914 46914 86460 86460 02760 02760 38015 38015
78892 78892 62565 62565 99367 99367 55774 55774 92425 92425
20996 20996 54222 54222 75844 75844 92117 92117 57857 57857
86260 86260 42328 42328 99477 99477 15185 15185 73078 73078
17746 17746 06321 06321 97622 97622 56493 56493 11052 11052
15464 15464 90218 90218 30007 30007 09944 09944 26099 26099
50889 50889 52199 52199 15872 15872 65070 65070 75420 75420
23082 23082 54206 54206 31940 31940 82185 82185 42726 42726
01241 01241 79779 79779 37219 37219 40385 40385 15293 15293
21926 21926 06775 06775 02527 02527 19825 19825 79408 79408
09179 09179 72018 72018 90977 90977 93952 93952 49306 49306
34420 34420 29236 29236 37988 37988 89907 89907 84188 84188
64465 64465 04554 04554 08478 08478 73199 73199 48950 48950
75854 75854
K-BYE

Drowning us in a bathtub

[Catbeller]

Grover Norquist, neocon extraordinaire and architect of Bush's economic program, once said that he wanted to shrink the Federal government to a size that could be then drowned in a bathtub.

After a 200 billion dollar war, estimated to have a final cost in the trillions, massive tax cuts, and borrowing to finance all of that, we are coming close to the endgame that the neocon theorists are playing towards: the bankrupting of the Federal government. No money for discretionary projects. It's a radical agenda. They are repealing the twentieth century by spending the government to death. And they're making a FORTUNE while doing so, and will continue to do so in the future as we service the debt they are saddling us with -- they own some of that debt, so they have a perpetual welfare machine for the wealthy. 17 percent of the budget is now interest on the debt, and it will increase to 25 percent in the nest few years. Imagine: a quarter from every dollar taxed will go to the holders of the debt instruments -- forever, since we'll never have the cash to pay down that nine billion dollar monster. We've gone from a 5 trillion dollar debt to a 9 trillion dollar debt in five years.

And back to point, this means no space program. No NASA. No research. No satellites to monitor global warming. No Mars. No SETI. NASA was living in a trailer park, budgetwise, for decades, but now it is being evicted from the lot.

No money left, sorry, we spent it all.

AND we'll still need to raise taxes just to keep up with the debt payments!

How much have the neocons cost us with these supply side experiments? How many trillions ahve we paid, how many more, just in interest to finance these tax cuts?

Re:Good idea though

[LeonGeeste]

Ah, good point. Why is "Dei" before "Gratia" though? My Latin sucks balls.

I think what I was looking for was "Deo volente". Congess provides the benefits Deo volente -- they do their best to find a place in the budget, but there's no guarantee they'll come through.

Sometimes whipping out a Latin phrase backfires :-(