Slashdot Mirror


IBM Germany Leaving Vista for Linux

UltimaGuy writes "During a presentation on IBM's involvement with Open Source, Andreas Pleschek from IBM in Stuttgart, Germany, who heads open source and Linux technical sales across North East Europe for IBM made a very interesting statement..."Andreas Pleschek also told that IBM has cancelled their contract with Microsoft as of October this year. That means that IBM will not use Windows Vista for their desktops. Beginning from July, IBM employees will begin using IBM Workplace on their new, Red Hat-based platform. Not all at once - some will keep using their present Windows versions for a while. But none will upgrade to Vista." "

24 of 351 comments (clear)

  1. HAL by xzanthar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If IBM is not going to move to Windows Vista, does that mean that more people will see some more of the advantages of moving to Linux?

    --
    I encrypt all my files with Double XOR Encryption!
  2. Re:Redhat? by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's my question too! Why RedHat? SuSE, in my opinion, is better than RedHat both on the server and desktop. This is not to say it (SuSE) has no issues at all. I find that its YaST is too slow and looks ancient, not to mention the fact that it will run through all those config scripts even when no configuration is changed at all!

  3. I think its A matter of time by MrShaggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We have seen that the open-document-format take hold, and now the big iron is pulling away from MS, shortly after. Given some more time, I think that we will see this trend continue. We will see more and more with ODF, taking MS's place. Even to the point of having document converters, to go from .docto .odf. This also the time to see the movement of the massess to a linux environment. I think you will see tax-programs, et al. moving because of the ODF as well. I think that there will be a lot of script-style viri as well that will go throuigh everyones documents, ala the excell virus. The only reason that all this stuff didnt happen on larger scale, was because of the different formats. But if every Joe-Linux Distro includeed a nice easy-top-use office, and all that, it would be easier to switch. MS will become another smaller company.. It's innovations were in the 90s. Im ure that they will keep up for some time.. But this is a huge financial blow to them.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
  4. Exaggerations! by blackmonday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its BS to say that "no one will upgrade" to Vista. Are you telling me that software developers will not be using Vista at all? It's a ridiculous notion for a company that develops hundreds of products for the Windows OS.

    1. Re:Exaggerations! by Penguinoflight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IBM will not be forced to upgrade to vista. Their software runs server side, and almost all of it is supported directly by IBM. There is no reason in fact for IBM to support Vista, and by doing so support Microsoft.

      Think of it this way: If nobody supports vista, nobody will have to support vista! While IBM moving away from microsoft is a move in the right direction, IBM will not be able to crush Vista on their own, they will need help.

      The only group that will need to support Vista is game developers. Most (with exception of Epic, iD, and a few others) have gone so far to avoid opengl, and embrace directx, they will be forced to adopt Vista just to keep things moderately insecure (Microsoft will strategically drop security support for xp soon enough).

      It should be noted, there is no reason for game devs to support windows; It's far too insecure for gaming, and that wont get any better. A move to linux (and with it FreeBSD by binary compatibility) would allow devs to go with only 2-3 major platforms: OpenGL for PS3, linux/PC, and possibly nintendo revolution. Of course you would have to support directX for xbox360, but over time the extra cost to develop for microsoft would probably kill their projects.

      We have come to the point where the time to move away from microsoft is NOW, but unfortunately it will take a while for vendors and developers to realize that.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    2. Re:Exaggerations! by IDontAgreeWithYou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It should be noted, there is no reason for game devs to support windows"

      You mean other than the fact that Windows is on ~90% of all PCs. I really don't think that's a market they are going to just give up on. It is obviously well worth their effort to develop games for Windows.

      "It's far too insecure for gaming"

      I can see an OS being too insecure for doing financial transactions or storing personal information, but gaming...

      --
      Finding other idiots on /. that agree with your opinion doesn't make it any less stupid.
    3. Re:Exaggerations! by IDontAgreeWithYou · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have not convinced me... at all. Most PC gamers (especially casual gamers) play on their PCs because they already own them. They dont want to spend money on a console just to play games when they already have a PC. I would bet everything I own that game manufacturers will not give up on the Windows platform any time in the near future. All of the arguments you just made were also made when XP came out. XP wasn't going to support older software etc. I don't have anything against Linux, by the way. It's just not going to be a real threat to Windows on the desktop anytime soon. In a few years, most desktop PCs will be running Vista.

      --
      Finding other idiots on /. that agree with your opinion doesn't make it any less stupid.
  5. ... but are they still stuck with Notes? by supersnail · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Most IBM slavelings don't care about windows vis redhat vis suse, if only they would dump Lotus notes client everybody would be a lot happier.

    --
    Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
  6. Oh happy me! by ZX81 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great news, it's about time that someone started rolling Linux out onto the Desktop in a large enterprise.

    Someone has to be the beta tester! :)

    --
    -={ Security does not exist - give up }=-
  7. Re:Now, is that IBM Germany, or more Worldwide? by swillden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Either is compelling as a statement from Big Blue

    IBM's CIO has already made clear that IBM's direction for its employees' desktops is Linux. Back in 2004 he released a statement that IBM would standardize on Linux desktops by the end of 2005, but it was quickly realized that was too ambitious a goal. There's just too much stuff in IBM that is tied to Windows. Still, it's widely recognized that Linux *is* the direction, worldwide, even if there isn't a specific timeline in place.

    As an IBMer who uses Linux as his desktop platform for work, I read these sorts of announcements with glee because they just reinforce the message internally that new internal IT systems should not require Windows and that old ones that do require Windows need to be replaced. At present I still have to keep a Win2K VMware image around to deal with the occasional Windows-specific internal tools, and to deal with the occasional Office doc that OOo can't manage. As more groups within IBM move more aggressively away from Windows, however, I expect to need that image less and less, and someday I won't need it at all.

    ObDisclaimer: I'm an IBM employee, but not a spokesperson. Everything I've said about IBM's plans and policies is just my vague memories of publicly-released information. If you find official statements that contradict mine, I'm wrong.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  8. This applies to all users of Vista by DFJA · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Now look at IBM -- for them to base their business around Vista would make them *completely* under the control of Microsoft.

    Note that this applies to All users of Vista, not just IBM.

    Just in case you were thinking of upgrading.....

    --
    43 - For those who require slightly more than the answer to life, the universe and everything.
  9. Re:news denied by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's no way that IBM can convert to Linux until it has ported Lotus Notes. So far, employees using Linux have to run Notes using Wine. It is not very stable and some functions don't work. Until I see a Linux port, I won't believe this news.

  10. Still Just Noise by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think it's all just posturing so far. But would be a great move if it happened.

    The problem for any corporation updating to Vista is that you rather have to replace most of your hardware along the way as well.

    And upgrade your memory. Over on The Inquirer they're reporting that Vista consumes 800MB of RAM while idling. This is absolutely insane to someone who first started using computers in the early 1970's. There just isn't that much stuff that an Operating System should be doing. And yes, that really is 3X XP's current requirements, the thought of which certainly is warming Intel's little heart.

    Seems to me if MS wants to keep IBM in the fold they should be offering to buy them all new desktops.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Still Just Noise by jbolden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I started using computers in the 1970s. I'm a fan of bloatware OSes, I want 70s features in my OSes. I want relational databases built in and available to all apps (like DB2 on an IBM mainframe of RDB on VMS box. I want symbionts and PFS so that I can do complex print bundling rather than just simple spooling. I want and a clear separation between operations and administration. I want built in OS level compilers that support complex data structures across apps and in my databases.

      If the PC guys keep it up we may actually have a 70's OS.

  11. Re:Making the switch by Mr+Pippin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "rsh"? Me strongly thinks you should switch to using "ssh" for that.

  12. Boy, doesn't this subthread prove Dell right? by Tran · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The top level post was a clear enough question regarding business relationships, but one level down the argument already is about which distro is better.

  13. Re:Redhat? by mytec · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, why does it matter that it's Redhat instead of SuSE or any of the other 100+ distros? Looking at the bigger picture, it would seem GNU/Linux is advancing. Isn't that more important than the particular distro?

  14. Re:news denied by Chemicalscum · · Score: 3, Insightful
    There's no way that IBM can convert to Linux until it has ported Lotus Notes

    They have, the new client is called Hannover named after the location of the IBM technical forum where it was first announced:

    http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/hanno ver----announcing-the-next-post-7.0-version-of-lot us-notes

    It is based on the Java Eclipse RCP (Rich Client Platform) used by Workplace the Notes C++ code has been rewritten as an Eclipse plugin. The code can then be compiled to work on any platform that eclipse runs on; Linux, AIX , Mac OSX and Windows. I think the next Notes client release which will be based on Hannover is due later this year as Notes V7.0.

  15. Re:This is America! by KlomDark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yah, but even though I'm pretty much one of those "Speak English or Die!" types when on American soil, I still have no problem with getting content in German from a German server.

    Just when I go to Mexico, I do my best to speak Spanish (It's very bad, I read Spanish much better than I speak it), and don't expect signs to be in English down there.

    I just wish we got the same consideration when Mexicans come to the US. (There's a billboard a couple blocks from my house that is in 100% Spanish. Complete bullshit if you ask me. As you said "This is America!")

    But, getting pissed because a German web server does not have English content is assine.

  16. Re:Ridiculous by Chemicalscum · · Score: 4, Insightful
    IBM is a consulting company - they provide hardware and software to support other company's infrastructure. The idea that they will convert their clients and potential clients to GNU/Linux is a kind of ridiculous in a market dominated by Windows.

    IBM is aiming for platform agnostic software client, side with anything new based on the the Eclipse RCP (Rich Client Platform) using Java as with IBM Workplace. The client side applications they produce will run on Linux, AIX, Mac OSX AND Windows

  17. Re:news denied by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >There's no way that IBM can convert to Linux until it has ported Lotus Notes.

    IBM Workplace has Notes client plugin. 2.6 is nice and fast too.

  18. Re:Bill will have the last laugh by metamatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Somehow I imagine IBM and Lenovo will work out a deal to purchase PCs without Vista. You don't think IBM buys desktop systems and laptops from Dell, do you?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  19. Re:I'm not surprised by Deathlizard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All IBM sold Lenovo was the Laptop and Desktop lines. They still own a lot of the technology behind the systems, such as the TCPA technology, and you can bet it's in their Workstations and Servers because it's an added value that the man with a plaid suit and Big teeth can sell to the Pointy haired boss.

    Thats why they are working with Red Hat, Because they want Red Hat to take advantage of the encryption and added security the chip brings.

  20. Re:Redhat? by Macka · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I find that its YaST is too slow and looks ancient, not to mention the fact that it will run through all those config scripts even when no configuration is changed at all!
    It's not still doing that is it? I stopped using SuSE years ago and that was one of my main beefs. If I wanted to set something up by hand I'd have to go way out of my way to find out where all the proprietary-SuSE-only config files / scripts were stashed or risk having YaST obliterate my changes the next time I wanted to do something as mundane as change a user config. I hated YaST with a passion for that very reason. I always recommend Redhat to customers now.