Slashdot Mirror


Mac Mini vs. Media Center

An anonymous reader writes "C|Net is pitting the new Intel Core Duo Mac Mini against Microsoft Media Center. The first round of the fight concludes: 'The Mac Mini automatically recognised the LCD TV we're using, and the third-party tuner was similarly straightforward to set up. Compared to the hours we've spent coaxing similar results out of a Microsoft Media Center system, the Mini is definitely ahead so far.'"

13 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. mythtv by willieray · · Score: 5, Informative

    I find that neither has anything on mythtv. open source and the latest version has firewire capture and channel changing from my SA3250HD. Check it out if you haven't yet. http://mythtv.org/

  2. Where's the insight? by Kaellenn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Several paragraphs to lead us to one conclusion: the mac mini recognized the LCD TV, the Media Center PC didn't.

    There...I just saved thousands of slashdot readers from reading that poor excuse for an article. They may as well have ended it by saying, "we're just trying to cheese you into visiting our web site over and over."

    1. Re:Where's the insight? by demonbug · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was worse than that. They basically said, "The mac mini recognized our LCD TV right away, but this one time when we were trying out a Media Center PC we had trouble setting it up (it may or may not have been the same TV, it might have been four years ago, we really don't want to bother you with details or specifics), so obviously the Mini is far superior to Media Center"

      They were basically comparing a mac mini to vague recollections of media center PCs they've tried in the past, with no effort whatsoever to compare features or make any meaningful analysis. This was an ad for mac minis, no more and no less (which is not to say the Mini wouldn't have come out ahead in an actual comparison, but this article is completely useless as far as providing information goes).

  3. Re:Mac Mini hd drive size and video by Golias · · Score: 4, Informative

    I upgraded the HD on my G4 mini last year. It's a simple laptop drive and fairly easy to swap out if you know what you're doing. Obviously, you can also use external drives using Firewire or USB2.

    For DVD & Media file archives, you could also store things on an external server. The Ethernet port is easilly fast enough to play DVD images off network drives.

    The Integrated video makes it kind of a dud for gaming, but from all reports the Dual Core can handle full-scale HDTV fine, and if you haven't jumped on the HD bandwagon yet, the cheaper model would do the job. So at least it's a good machine for PVR stuff, if computer gaming is not a priority.

    (Exception: WoW scales down beautifully. I've even played it on a G4 iBook.)

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  4. Re:I don't get it... by jchapman16 · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least one f***up is that the ATI Radeon's DVI to Component adapter will not display DVD movies at a resolution higher than 640x480 (although all other video content is fine at HD resolutions). So if you want to use your Media Center PC to play DVDs and not change have to change the resolution beforehand, you'll need to ditch that useless component adapter from ATI. Of course, it's not like the mini has component out either; the best option for both is a direct DVI connection between computer and HDTV.

  5. Apple to phase out satellite providers? by Prairiewest · · Score: 4, Informative
    Apple probably intends iTunes to eventually usurp terrestrial and satellite TV.
    Personally, I'll continue to use satellite, thank you.

    One of our local internet providers broadcasts television content over high-speed (ADSL). We tried it out for a while, but switched back to satellite due to lack of good movie selection. However, I am also happy of the switch back for another reason: the constant flow of bits (actually megabits!) over our connection noticably degraded our internet experience.

    I've been watching all of the talk lately about two-tiered internet and the rise of more and more content of ever-increasing size being sent across the net, and it makes me wonder when it will plateau. (I know, I know... it won't) If content providers keep pushing for internet video-on-demand and if more consumers switch to getting their movies and also regular TV programming from the internet, we are going to fill up those big bandwidth pipes. (Yes, again I know: the ISPs will just do traffic shaping and/or charge us more for premium service)

  6. It works pretty well and supports 1080p by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just got a Mac Mini Core Duo exactly for use as a dedicated HTPC. After some testing, it supports 1080p MP4 playback just fine. The video card is aimed at media and 2D accelleration (for UI features) and thus actually works pretty well has a HTPC. You just need to make sure you have at least a GB of RAM. Note that if you're going to get the full 2GB it's cheaper to order from Apple ($300) instead of crucial ($370) unless you can make use of the two 256MB chips you could pull from the mini. Convential wisdom is that it's always cheaper to not buy RAM from Apple but it does not hold in this case (it might if Apple offered an option as they do in other computer to ship with one chip installed instead of two).

    And if you turn on Apple Remote Desktop Sharing you can set it up to be controllable via VNC, so you can connect to it to do maintenience or control even if away from the TV.

    Between the digital audio out and gigbit ethernet the new Mini has hadded just the right things to make it really work well as an HTPC.

    One thing to note is that out of the box, for some reason the default in DVDPlayer.app is not to use 5.1 sound. So if you're hooking up the digital output make sure to go into DVDPlayer.app preferences and set the audio options to "Digital Only". I spent a little while figuring that out... DVDPlayer.app is what FrontRow uses behind the scenes for DVD playback, just as ITunes is used to do music playback.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  7. Re:So true... by Golias · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's for decompressing H.264 on the fly with Quicktime.

    HDTV signals are typically basic MPEG streams, which requires less CPU power.

    EyeTV reccomends any dual-CPU Mac for 1080 HDTV.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  8. 1080p works well on a Core Duo mini by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple's site might say that but it's not the reality of the situation. I tried 1080p last night with the HD downloads they offer and it works just fine (on a Core Duo Mac mini with 2GB of RAM). Also read this account for more confirmation, and a number of other posts elsewhere.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. An MCE proponent speaks about problems by dada21 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been running MCE flawlessly for almost a year now, and it generally works great for me. But the ugliness of Microsoft's usual suspects is starting to rear its ugly face: MCE doesn't scale well.

    I'm on the verge of trying MythTV for the 5th time in a year over just 2 basic problems with MCE: the more stuff I save, the slower things go. More memory and processor speed have done little to combat this problem, and the broad is getting frustrated with having to wait between clicks.

    The other problem is also performance related: accessing data stored over the network is terribly slow and inefficient. It likely has to do with my bad WiFi router performance combined with Window's overall inefficiency in handling large files over a network.

    I'm a big pro-MCE guy, and my home media network is MUCH larger than most people would care to use (I combine not just video and audio but financial market clips and personal video clips as well). For now, MCE is working, but it is quickly becoming unusable just because I can no longer scale it beyond the current amount of data I'm storing.

    Anyone use MythTV or the Mac Mini to store terabytes of video and audio, successfully?

  10. Nvidia HDTV nightmare by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 4, Informative
    I can't speak for your ATi experience, but about a year ago I helped someone attempt to setup a machine with a pretty modern Nvidia card hook up to an HDTV for a display in a gallery. We had the latest drivers, and he even downloaded extra software to tweak timings.

    We eventually just gave up and used an LCD monitor. We couldn't get any reasonable timings to work, either the resolution was way too low, or the text was too blurry to read. It was a nightmare. We spent several hours on it. Painful.

  11. Re:So true... by Golias · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had a mini running my HDTV projector for almost a year (before I got a sweet deal on a dual-G5 tower.)

    Let's look at your complaints, one by one:

    First headache was hooking it up to the TV. No computer does completely well with overscan, but at least the Windows rig I built had nVidia drivers where I could tweak the exact resolution I wanted. On Mac I got a single checkbox that said "Overscan" (didn't do the trick) and I couldn't get DisplayX, ResX, etc to properly change the resolution.

    Plugging the DVI cable right into the HDMI input on my projector was easy enough.

    On my projector, I lose about 12 vertical pixels at 720p. (Fewer in 1080i, but 720 is the native resolution for my projector.)

    Tweaked my view to lose them mostly from the bottom rather than the top... Put the dock on the side of the screen... Got on with my life.

    Watching shows, I lose less of the screen image than people with ordinary HDTV sets do. Watching movies I usually lose nothing, since the aspect ratio is usually even wider than 16:9. Done.

    It refused to play VIDEO_TS folders (my Media Center box does). I won't fault it for that, but I will fault it for having no kind of zoom feature for 4:3/16:9.

    The Mac has this very obscure application called "DVD Player" which plays VIDEO_TS folders just fine, and also has the zoom feature you are so depressed about missing. Best of all, I am able to use my universal remote to browse through my entire DVD library on my firewire drives, select the one I want, and watch it in full-screen 16:9 mode. This is all just from the basic OS with a cheap Keyspan IR sensor, mind you. No need for fancy apps.

    And don't get me started with the 3rd-party TV recording app. Having to use 2 remotes defeats the purpose of Apple's "simple" design.

    My EyeTV remote hasn't come out of the kitchen drawer since the week that I bought it. Nor do I use the Keyspan remote for my Mac.

    I do everything with the programmable remote that came with my Amp. Have you never heard of universal remotes?

    But as a media center, it absolutely sucks. I ended up returning it.

    You're nuts. I would NEVER part with my Mac in favor of a Windows-based media center.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  12. Re:So true... by Cadallin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seriously, I don't understand all of this pissing and moaning. Since Flip4mac came out, I've been able to play 99% of media files with no problem whatsoever. Although I prefer VLC for most everything and only use Quicktime player for a couple of formats. So maybe that explains my superior experience :)