Maryland Votes To Ban Diebold Voting Machines
vandon writes "Computerworld.com reports: 'The state Maryland House of Delegates this week voted 137-0 to approve a bill prohibiting election officials from using AccuVote-TSx touch-screen systems in 2006 primary and general elections. The legislation calls for the state to lease paper-based optical-scan systems for this year's votes. State Delegate Anne Healey estimated the leasing cost at $12.5 million to $16 million for the two elections.'"
I guess they couldn't hack it.
Unfortunately, they voted using a Diebold machine, so it doesn't matter anyway.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
Allow Diebold voting machines? [ Yes ] [ Yes ] [ Yes ]
(later) "...well, what do you know, due to a horrible software misconfiguration everyone's voted against the machines!"
Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
The big question is, did they use Diebold machines to count the votes? *ducks*
Well, if they did I'd call it a new world record in incompetence when it comes to vote tampering...
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
In related news, it seems that Diebold has since started a new ad campaign.
In more related news, stock of the Harland Company, parent company of Scantron, got a small bump today.
In other news Diebold announced today the introduction of the AccuVote-TSx-2 touch-screen voting system. The new system boasts the same features and functionality of the AccuVote-TSx, however, it has a different name to comply with a recently enacted law in the state of Maryland.
Unknown host pong.
This is further proof that Republicans are intolerant. They obviously think that people shouldn't be allowed to vote, just because they are dead.
Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
Knowing my fellow Americans we'd buy some expensive Diebold voting machines that ran a stripped down version of Microsoft Windows XP on them with some horribly clunky ASP.net based website and IIS running on each machine. Each machine would cost about $10,000 a piece and require a team of software programmers to update each one before an election to load the new candidate data on it.