Linux, to be (Like Microsoft) or Not to be?
David writes "Stephen Shipman delivers a very articulate and concise view of how Linux fits in server and end user environments. He expresses his view in response to Nicolas Petreley's 'rant' in Linux Journal. He points out the subtle implications of efficiency versus consistency." From the article: "[...] efficiency (as measured by keystrokes) isn't the only metric for ease of use. Consistency must also be taken into account. Microsoft has made a lot of hay (and green) by flogging consistency".
HELLO WORLD
56653 56653
HELLO WORLD
19700 19700 26882 26882 27142 27142 11911 11911 84404 84404
31823 31823 92053 92053 20416 20416 36391 36391 42760 42760
28195 28195 38251 38251 98215 98215 98515 98515 39198 39198
68575 68575 43609 43609 14824 14824 20713 20713 34795 34795
06284 06284 47084 47084 42495 42495 39708 39708 29742 29742
K-BYE
My work here is dung.
I'd like to get my ol' lady using Linux without freaking her out too much. Which desktop environment is best at looking like Windows? Is there some addition to KDE or Gnome that has an XP theme?
While we are on this subject. Why is Ubuntu seemingly more popular than Suse these days? Is it the desktop? The debian goodness of apt-get? Having used both for a while, I still can't quite put my finger on it.