Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Internet Growth Stalling

abb_road writes "Internet usage is predicted to grow by only 1% in 2006, with uptake slowing even more in subsequent years. The article examines causes for the slowdown, including individuals who are actively choosing to not be online. These non-users cite a number of reasons for their decision, including cost and increased productivity. Is this simply a combination of luddites and a statistical quirk, or is the Internet reaching its saturation point in the U.S.?"

2 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. Enough with the hand wringing by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Informative
    Eventually, pretty everyone who wants a product has it. Those who don't want it, don't get it. Just because internet growth has been expanding by leaps and bounds is not a reason to think it will always be so.

    Its like after opening day in baseball when a third of the players in the league are projected to bat .500 with 162 homeruns and 400+ RBIs.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  2. Re:Reasoning based on false assumptions by Ken_g6 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Likewise, from the end of the article:

    Puente doesn't even have a computer at home. That would mean spending close to $1,000, plus an additional $15 to $20 a month for Internet service, not to mention the inevitable upgrades. "You always have to buy some new software to make it juicier," she says. "What kind of juice would I be getting out of it? Nothing."

    1. You can get a computer for ~$500.
    2. I have internet for $7 a month (going up to $10 after the first year).
    3. Aside from software required for school or work, I haven't bought any software in years. There are too many good free/OSS solutions out there!

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)