Slashdot Mirror


On the Future of Science

bj8rn writes "Kevin Kelly, the founding executive editor of Wired magazine, speculates about the future of science based on a talk he have gave a few weeks ago. Kelly sees recursion as the essence of science and chronicles the introduction of different recursive devices in science; projecting forward from this, he makes several interesting predictions about what the near future may hold in store. Some highlights: there will be more change in the next 50 years of science than in the last 400 years; the new century will be the century of Biology; new ways of knowing will emerge, with 'Wikiscience' leading to perpetually refined papers with thousands of authors."

3 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Wikiscience: see this post by bj8rn · · Score: 4, Funny


    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  2. Re: Change will occur much more rapidly than that by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    > If you see Moorse's law as applied to electronics

    Moorse's law: the number of people who know Moorse code is halving every decade.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  3. Re:Wikiscience by lennier · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you imagine a natural selection paper written by the masses?

    Because of course something as irreducibly complex as Darwinian theory could never arise from the competitive random chance interactions of a normally-distributed population.

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC