Slashdot Mirror


Linux 2.6.16 released

diegocgteleline.es writes "Linux 2.6.16 has been released after two months and two weeks of development. You can check the comprehensible changelog (text mirror of the site). The new features include OCFS2, a clustering filesystem contributed by Oracle, new unshare(), pselect()/ppoll() and *at() system calls, support the moving of the physical location of pages between nodes in NUMA systems, support for the Cell processor, cpufreq support for G5s plus thermal control for dualcore G5s, improved power management support for many devices and subsystems (libata, alsa...), a new mutex locking primitive, high-resolution timers, per-mountpoint noatime/nodiratime, 64-to-32-bit ioctl compatibility for the v4l2 subsystem, IPv6 support for DCCP, the TIPC protocol (Transparent Inter Process Communication, ACL support for CIFS filesystem, HFSX filesystem support, new configfs filesystem (which complements sysfs, not replaces it), support for running executables from v9fs (plan9 9P distributed filesystem), support for many new devices, improved support for others and lots of other changes. Check it out from kernel.org"

7 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    But does it run Linux?

    FP, too.

    Glad I can't log in, I don't have karma to burn.

  2. Re:I'm mixed up here by 10Ghz · · Score: -1, Troll

    Considering the amount of discussions there has been about the new developement-model of the kernel, I think it's safe to say that

    a) You are just acting stupid
    b) You really are stupid

    In either case, you are a fucking moron (and stupid).

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  3. Caveat Emptor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    OCFS2 has more bugs than a $10 whore. I'd highly advise staying away from it, despite how cool it sounds. Best to stick with an implementation from a company that doesn't hire graduates from Devry.

  4. Linux is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    It is official; Netcraft confirms: Linux is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Linux community when IDC confirmed that Linux market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Linux has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Linux is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin [amdest.com] to predict Linux's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Linux faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Linux because Linux is dying. Things are looking very bad for Linux. As many of us are already aware, Linux continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    All major surveys show that Linux has steadily declined in market share. Linux is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Linux is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. Linux continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Linux is dead.

    Fact: Linux is dying

  5. Re:I'm mixed up here by m50d · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nope. The kernel no longer has a stable release. 2.6 is unstable despite the even number, 2.4 is deep maintenance don't touch it, and anyone wanting to release a distribution has to stabilise the kernel themselves, ruling out the hobbyists. I suppose linus' corporate masters are happy.

    --
    I am trolling
  6. Re:Linus' new philosophy of development in main tr by m50d · · Score: 1, Troll

    My experience is exactly the same. 2.6 sucks, quite frankly, and doesn't deserve the even version number. It should have remained 2.5 until it was stable, which it certainly isn't at the moment.

    --
    I am trolling
  7. Re:Linus' new philosophy of development in main tr by aussersterne · · Score: 1, Troll

    Agreed, stability has suffered. I have regular OOPSen at this point, something I've NEVER had in Linux before. No, it's not memory or hardware failures. They're bugs.

    For example, I can reproduce an OOPS immediately on my laptop with Orinoco-based wireless simply by using EHCI (USB2) at the same time. Either one alone = great, no problem. Start a download and copy a file over USB2 = immediate OOPS (within fifteen seconds, guaranteed), and the system must be rebooted before Orinoco will work properly again.

    I spent half an hour trying to post to the development lists for these projects but thanks to our SPAM-enabled world, I never got past "we only allow posts from list subscribers." I couldn't get their subscription confirmers to reach me and thus I couldn't post to them.

    The solution has been what? "Always bring the network down if I need to access my external USB2 devices, then bring then network back up when I'm done." That is a crapass solution for what is supposed to be an industry stability leader.

    Other OOPSen include the Linux video subsystem (I used to do video editing in Linux, but I'm giving up on that for a while) and something to do with framebuffer drivers that I don't have a good sense for yet but that has happened several times on a machine that was rock solid in the 2.4 days.

    Linux is unfortunately becoming more like Windows: a user-friendly desktop that "just works" -- when you can get it to work. I preferred the old model: it needs to be configured for six hours using sixty shell scripts and config files, but once you're done, it won't need to be rebooted for six years while you do your work.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW